Computer models created by people who have an expected outcome.
Do you by chance have computer models from people with different expectations showing different results?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Computer models created by people who have an expected outcome.
The government has an agenda so refuses to fund us to create an accurate computer model.Computer models created by people who have an expected outcome.
Do you by chance have computer models from people with different expectations showing different results?
doesn't that take funding? Where do you supposed that would come from? We already know the governments don't want different results so getting money there is virtually impossible, and if the fossil fuel industry covers the costs, all you wackos loose a nut. But thanks for playing.Computer models created by people who have an expected outcome.
Do you by chance have computer models from people with different expectations showing different results?
shows you a fool by showing you they must fudge the models to make them appear relevant... just like our political polling today... Gall-E-G......So, the answer is no. Got it.
evidence? ..ok frances.I think it shows (and unlike you, I can produce evidence) that GCMs that do NOT assume AGW is taking place DO NOT WORK. Such models produce temperature trends which rapidly deviate GROSSLY from observations. They are completely unable to recreate (hind cast) the previous century and their output looking forward borders on the absurd.
evidence? ..ok frances.I think it shows (and unlike you, I can produce evidence) that GCMs that do NOT assume AGW is taking place DO NOT WORK. Such models produce temperature trends which rapidly deviate GROSSLY from observations. They are completely unable to recreate (hind cast) the previous century and their output looking forward borders on the absurd.
You have no facts there. You have Roy Spencer's blundering attempt to badmouth CMIP 5 GCMs. See HotWhopper: Roy Spencer's latest deceit and deception.
And neither Spencer's work nor your comments address YOUR problem that NO ONE has ever created a GCM that even approaches reality without including AGW. If you disagree, find us one.
Refute ANYTHING she said in that article.