Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
and what's even funnier, is you all claim it is nasty shit and can't prove that. We on the other hand have the AR5 report which in it states no warming in fifteen years. Well that blows your fking claim completely out of the water, exactly where they then claim all the heat went. Too funny gene too funny. yep, you got shit and you can't prove shit. You got......................................nothing. We have the AR5 report.Except the only issue here is getting you to believe it. Science is there fto present facts. You call the facts something other than facts and demand.....FACTS! Lol...it's a cute little game where you demand something until it's given then you dismiss those findings as if your dismissal means the facts never happened.
So at the end of the day what you're saying is that CO2 has no effect on anything. LOL...that's funny
It also is what makes pop and beer.Except the only issue here is getting you to believe it. Science is there fto present facts. You call the facts something other than facts and demand.....FACTS! Lol...it's a cute little game where you demand something until it's given then you dismiss those findings as if your dismissal means the facts never happened.
So at the end of the day what you're saying is that CO2 has no effect on anything. LOL...that's funny
Wake up...I started a whole thread asking for nothing more than to be deluged with the observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence gathered from out here in the real observable, measurable, quantifiable world that supports the A in AGW.... and thus far, not one bit of actual evidence in support of that all important A has been posted...certainly observed, measured evidence of some things...but not the A in AGW....you believe evidence exists...there is a whole thread whose sole purpose is for you to slap me down and make me your bitch with it...you got evidence go to the thread titled "In support of the A in AGW" and give it your best shot...
I predict, however, that you won't show and if you do, you won't have anything like actual observed, measured, quantified evidence in support of the A in AGW...
And sure, CO2 has an effect on things....it makes plants grow great...It can put out an electrical fire or chemical fire safely...it even serves a purpose in your body...but altering the global climate?...not a chance in hell.
so why is it necessary to change observed temperature data sets?Wake up...I started a whole thread asking for nothing more than to be deluged with the observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence gathered from out here in the real observable, measurable, quantifiable world that supports the A in AGW....
And you were given it, in spades, and in response you went into a meltdown of denial. It's why you're called a denier. And why that thread is now only useful as an illustration of the personality disorders displayed by hard core cultists.
Oh, once more, here's the link to the hundreds of lab experiments documenting the IR spectral absorption properties of all atmospheric gases, put together by those pinkos at the Air Force. Deniers will scream "That doesn't count!" because ... because ... well, they don't say. They just sulk about how the last century of physics is a conspiracy. It's the same "Because I say so!" standard they use in every aspect of their "science".
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/hitran/Updated/ref-table.pdf
Anyways, you deniers all make sure you throw some money at self-admitted paid propagandist Morano. The cult wants you to, and that's all the motivation you should need.
Wake up...I started a whole thread asking for nothing more than to be deluged with the observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence gathered from out here in the real observable, measurable, quantifiable world that supports the A in AGW....
And you were given it, in spades, and in response you went into a meltdown of denial. It's why you're called a denier. And why that thread is now only useful as an illustration of the personality disorders displayed by hard core cultists.
Oh, once more, here's the link to the hundreds of lab experiments documenting the IR spectral absorption properties of all atmospheric gases, put together by those pinkos at the Air Force. Deniers will scream "That doesn't count!" because ... because ... well, they don't say. They just sulk about how the last century of physics is a conspiracy. It's the same "Because I say so!" standard they use in every aspect of their "science".
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/hitran/Updated/ref-table.pdf
Anyways, you deniers all make sure you throw some money at self-admitted paid propagandist Morano. The cult wants you to, and that's all the motivation you should need.
There is not one study in that whole database that shows CO2 increases the temperature of the earth. Not one. Point one out, link and quote, otherwise your link is another MOOT point.Wake up...I started a whole thread asking for nothing more than to be deluged with the observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence gathered from out here in the real observable, measurable, quantifiable world that supports the A in AGW....
And you were given it, in spades, and in response you went into a meltdown of denial. It's why you're called a denier. And why that thread is now only useful as an illustration of the personality disorders displayed by hard core cultists.
Oh, once more, here's the link to the hundreds of lab experiments documenting the IR spectral absorption properties of all atmospheric gases, put together by those pinkos at the Air Force. Deniers will scream "That doesn't count!" because ... because ... well, they don't say. They just sulk about how the last century of physics is a conspiracy. It's the same "Because I say so!" standard they use in every aspect of their "science".
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/hitran/Updated/ref-table.pdf
Anyways, you deniers all make sure you throw some money at self-admitted paid propagandist Morano. The cult wants you to, and that's all the motivation you should need.
SSDD, you're the guy on internet corner with a sandwich board, screaming "the end is near!". You're not ignored because of your brilliance. You're ignored because you're plainly crazy.
So, back to the topic. Anyone going to the Climate Hustle film on May 2? Tell you what. If somebody buys me a ticket, I'll go.
The usual suspects are doing some preemptive whining to explain why nobody wants to see it. It's because the mean ol' media is attacking it!
Press Declares War on 'Climate Hustle' Documentary
SSDD, you're the guy on internet corner with a sandwich board, screaming "the end is near!". You're not ignored because of your brilliance. You're ignored because you're plainly crazy.
So, back to the topic. Anyone going to the Climate Hustle film on May 2? Tell you what. If somebody buys me a ticket, I'll go.
The usual suspects are doing some preemptive whining to explain why nobody wants to see it. It's because the mean ol' media is attacking it!
Press Declares War on 'Climate Hustle' Documentary
As we hate to see the mentally handicapped taken advantage of, we at least attempt to keep deniers from sending any money to the various fraudsters who run their cult. But if they're dead set on funding shysters like Morano, we can't stop them.
Now Frankie Boy, we understand that any science beyond the third grade level is beyond your comprehension, but the experiment has already been done. During the Eemian, the CO2 level was 20 ppm above the normal interglacial, at 300 ppm. The sea level rose by twenty feet, and the forests line extended much further north than at present. In other words, the inertia of the system is such that the ocean and atmospheric temperatures have not even fully responded to the first 20 ppm of CO2 that we have put into the atmosphere.Paying people to say "CONSENSUS!!!" is not science
Of course it isnt...but science is science
yeah.
Can you point to even one single lab experiment linking 200PPM of CO2 to any discernible increase in temperature?
No?
Didn't think so
Now Frankie Boy, we understand that any science beyond the third grade level is beyond your comprehension, but the experiment has already been done. During the Eemian, the CO2 level was 20 ppm above the normal interglacial, at 300 ppm. The sea level rose by twenty feet, and the forests line extended much further north than at present. In other words, the inertia of the system is such that the ocean and atmospheric temperatures have not even fully responded to the first 20 ppm of CO2 that we have put into the atmosphere.Paying people to say "CONSENSUS!!!" is not science
Of course it isnt...but science is science
yeah.
Can you point to even one single lab experiment linking 200PPM of CO2 to any discernible increase in temperature?
No?
Didn't think so
[
And the media is using the same worthless tactic that you use... Appeal to authority. adhom and denigration... never once addressing the real facts..
[
And the media is using the same worthless tactic that you use... Appeal to authority. adhom and denigration... never once addressing the real facts..
From Wikipedia: Argument from authority - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The argument from authority (Latin: argumentum ad verecundiam) also appeal to authority, is a common argument form which can be fallacious, such as when an authority is cited on a topic outside their area of expertise, when the authority cited is not a true expert or if the cited authority is stating a contentious or controversial position.[1]
Note the use of the word "can" (emphasis mine) followed by three qualifying phrases.
An appeal to authority is false IF
1) The authority is cited on a topic outside their area of expertise
2) The authority is not a true expert
3) The authority is stating a contentious or controversial opinion.
None of these are true in the case of the overwhelming consensus position of the world's climate scientists. The appeal to authority in this instance is VALID.
So, the one-night showing of the film went off, with the expected whimper. If you read the reviews on WUWT, they mention how the audience was mostly old people.
On the same night, about a hundred times as many people watched Jimmy Kimmel's takedown of the movie and its TrueBelievers.
At this point, the score is 35-3, and the game is about running out the clock, waiting for the deniers to die off. Science advances one funeral at a time.
Which also means the deniers are winning!!
so you're saying that the CO2 parts per million went up by 20 and there was then twenty feet of water added to the ocean? Where did this happen, i have not seen any news on this? BTW, that wouldn't be an experiment BTW.Now Frankie Boy, we understand that any science beyond the third grade level is beyond your comprehension, but the experiment has already been done. During the Eemian, the CO2 level was 20 ppm above the normal interglacial, at 300 ppm. The sea level rose by twenty feet, and the forests line extended much further north than at present. In other words, the inertia of the system is such that the ocean and atmospheric temperatures have not even fully responded to the first 20 ppm of CO2 that we have put into the atmosphere.Paying people to say "CONSENSUS!!!" is not science
Of course it isnt...but science is science
yeah.
Can you point to even one single lab experiment linking 200PPM of CO2 to any discernible increase in temperature?
No?
Didn't think so
