gotta love when the k00ks keep throwing zero's!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The present decade is the warmest in the history of direct instrument measurement, so to deniers that means warming has leveled off. Next, to CON$, we will enter a cooling phase of steady temperatures.Ummm, no we havn't. We've said that the warming had levelled off. It also appear that we are entering into a cooling phase, but we won't know that for sure for another couple of years. The Earth doesn't have a thermostat that you switch on and off. It takes time for trends to become apparent.OH BULLSHIT!!!It does look like there has been warming since 1800, and that was the likely outcome.
Good for Muller for checking this work.
Now, if anyone can link that warming to being caused in any significant manner to man-made CO2, then the skeptics will be happy.
Contrary to popular belief, few of the scientific 'skeptics' argued that there was no warming. They surely did want honest data, but more importantly they want the science to support any claims that man-made CO2 caused any warming, and if it did, the magnitude and significance of that contribution.
The science does not support any conclusions on that.
The deniers have been claiming the globe has been COOLING since 1998!!!
no global warming since 1998 - Google Search
As far as the op ed that Muller released, I don't see anything wrong with it except for the part where he ascribes the warming to human causes with no supporting evidence. He is an avowed warmist after all, but when he gets the paper through peer review we will see what he really has to say.
Global warming skeptics suspected climate change scientists were hiding data. So the skeptics paid for a new study to find the real truth. The results are in! And they're identical to previous results: Humans are heating up the earth.
University of California physics professor Richard Muller, one of the most vocal skeptics, gathered a team of 10 scientists, mostly physicists, including 2011 Nobel Physics Prize winner Saul Perlmutter, to create the Berkeley Earth Project.
Muller et. al. thought that data from weather stations used for previous studies may have been off because those located close to cities would record artificially warm temperatures. So the Berkeley Earth Project used new methods to re-analyze data from 40,000 weather stations. And guess what? The resulting graph looks almost exactly the same as the graphs from previous studies.
Climate Change Skeptics Eat Crow
OH BULLSHIT!!!It does look like there has been warming since 1800, and that was the likely outcome.
Good for Muller for checking this work.
Now, if anyone can link that warming to being caused in any significant manner to man-made CO2, then the skeptics will be happy.
Contrary to popular belief, few of the scientific 'skeptics' argued that there was no warming. They surely did want honest data, but more importantly they want the science to support any claims that man-made CO2 caused any warming, and if it did, the magnitude and significance of that contribution.
The science does not support any conclusions on that.
The deniers have been claiming the globe has been COOLING since 1998!!!
no global warming since 1998 - Google Search
Global warming skeptics suspected climate change scientists were hiding data. So the skeptics paid for a new study to find the real truth. The results are in! And they're identical to previous results: Humans are heating up the earth.
University of California physics professor Richard Muller, one of the most vocal skeptics, gathered a team of 10 scientists, mostly physicists, including 2011 Nobel Physics Prize winner Saul Perlmutter, to create the Berkeley Earth Project.
Muller et. al. thought that data from weather stations used for previous studies may have been off because those located close to cities would record artificially warm temperatures. So the Berkeley Earth Project used new methods to re-analyze data from 40,000 weather stations. And guess what? The resulting graph looks almost exactly the same as the graphs from previous studies.
Climate Change Skeptics Eat Crow
Global warming skeptics suspected climate change scientists were hiding data. So the skeptics paid for a new study to find the real truth. The results are in! And they're identical to previous results: Humans are heating up the earth.
University of California physics professor Richard Muller, one of the most vocal skeptics, gathered a team of 10 scientists, mostly physicists, including 2011 Nobel Physics Prize winner Saul Perlmutter, to create the Berkeley Earth Project.
Muller et. al. thought that data from weather stations used for previous studies may have been off because those located close to cities would record artificially warm temperatures. So the Berkeley Earth Project used new methods to re-analyze data from 40,000 weather stations. And guess what? The resulting graph looks almost exactly the same as the graphs from previous studies.
Climate Change Skeptics Eat Crow
What an incredibly idiotic take on what happened, and you wonder why people reject everything people like you have to say on the subject.
Few people are debating there is climate change, but quite a few folks on this board seem rather loath to admit the possibility that humans are the primary cause. Besides the political crap, the only reason to deny CO2 pollution comes down to protecting the economy and profit, not some niggling obsession on scientific objectivity. The economy is like Jupiter, and he ate is own children. The economy is a monster we had ALL better learn to control, not let it dominate US. That is were this is going, a total collapse of both the economy and the ecological system. When the means to providing food to 7 billion people collapses, what the hell is going to happen? THAT is were this is going, and IF we can do something about it NOW, we better try.
Few people are debating there is climate change, but quite a few folks on this board seem rather loath to admit the possibility that humans are the primary cause. Besides the political crap, the only reason to deny CO2 pollution comes down to protecting the economy and profit, not some niggling obsession on scientific objectivity. The economy is like Jupiter, and he ate is own children. The economy is a monster we had ALL better learn to control, not let it dominate US. That is were this is going, a total collapse of both the economy and the ecological system. When the means to providing food to 7 billion people collapses, what the hell is going to happen? THAT is were this is going, and IF we can do something about it NOW, we better try.
What is the damage that "too much CO2" will cause? How much will it cost to prevent the damage? How much will it cost to repair the damage?
Until you can get real answers for those questions, we'd rather not destroy our economy.
All the proposed "solutions" to AGW will collapse the world economy.Few people are debating there is climate change, but quite a few folks on this board seem rather loath to admit the possibility that humans are the primary cause. Besides the political crap, the only reason to deny CO2 pollution comes down to protecting the economy and profit, not some niggling obsession on scientific objectivity. The economy is like Jupiter, and he ate is own children. The economy is a monster we had ALL better learn to control, not let it dominate US. That is were this is going, a total collapse of both the economy and the ecological system. When the means to providing food to 7 billion people collapses, what the hell is going to happen? THAT is were this is going, and IF we can do something about it NOW, we better try.
Few people are debating there is climate change, but quite a few folks on this board seem rather loath to admit the possibility that humans are the primary cause. Besides the political crap, the only reason to deny CO2 pollution comes down to protecting the economy and profit, not some niggling obsession on scientific objectivity. The economy is like Jupiter, and he ate is own children. The economy is a monster we had ALL better learn to control, not let it dominate US. That is were this is going, a total collapse of both the economy and the ecological system. When the means to providing food to 7 billion people collapses, what the hell is going to happen? THAT is were this is going, and IF we can do something about it NOW, we better try.
What is the damage that "too much CO2" will cause? How much will it cost to prevent the damage? How much will it cost to repair the damage?
Until you can get real answers for those questions, we'd rather not destroy our economy.
You just want real proof? Look around you. It is there, not in any posts here. Or sacrifice all to the all mighty economy. Look. All I ask.
I can't cure cancer. I can't. But being skeptical isn't a practical option, either, is it? Curing cancer may cost us billions. Stopping global warming may cost us plenty, but stopping the inevitable collapse of both our economy and our ecological system? Which of the two do you value more? Our existence or the economy?
The present decade is the warmest in the history of direct instrument measurement, so to deniers that means warming has leveled off. Next, to CON$, we will enter a cooling phase of steady temperatures.Ummm, no we havn't. We've said that the warming had levelled off. It also appear that we are entering into a cooling phase, but we won't know that for sure for another couple of years. The Earth doesn't have a thermostat that you switch on and off. It takes time for trends to become apparent.OH BULLSHIT!!!
The deniers have been claiming the globe has been COOLING since 1998!!!
no global warming since 1998 - Google Search
As far as the op ed that Muller released, I don't see anything wrong with it except for the part where he ascribes the warming to human causes with no supporting evidence. He is an avowed warmist after all, but when he gets the paper through peer review we will see what he really has to say.
Mind you there have been no "cooling phases" for the last 100 years even though according to the natural cycle warming phases should be followed by cooling phases. For the last 100 years warming phases have been followed by level phases which are followed by new warming phases that begin at about the same level as the last warming phase left off.
And Muller is an avowed skeptic!
Few people are debating there is climate change, but quite a few folks on this board seem rather loath to admit the possibility that humans are the primary cause. Besides the political crap, the only reason to deny CO2 pollution comes down to protecting the economy and profit, not some niggling obsession on scientific objectivity. The economy is like Jupiter, and he ate is own children. The economy is a monster we had ALL better learn to control, not let it dominate US. That is were this is going, a total collapse of both the economy and the ecological system. When the means to providing food to 7 billion people collapses, what the hell is going to happen? THAT is were this is going, and IF we can do something about it NOW, we better try.
Few people are debating there is climate change, but quite a few folks on this board seem rather loath to admit the possibility that humans are the primary cause. Besides the political crap, the only reason to deny CO2 pollution comes down to protecting the economy and profit, not some niggling obsession on scientific objectivity. The economy is like Jupiter, and he ate is own children. The economy is a monster we had ALL better learn to control, not let it dominate US. That is were this is going, a total collapse of both the economy and the ecological system. When the means to providing food to 7 billion people collapses, what the hell is going to happen? THAT is were this is going, and IF we can do something about it NOW, we better try.
What is the damage that "too much CO2" will cause? How much will it cost to prevent the damage? How much will it cost to repair the damage?
Until you can get real answers for those questions, we'd rather not destroy our economy.
You just want real proof? Look around you. It is there, not in any posts here. Or sacrifice all to the all mighty economy. Look. All I ask.
Few people are debating there is climate change, but quite a few folks on this board seem rather loath to admit the possibility that humans are the primary cause. Besides the political crap, the only reason to deny CO2 pollution comes down to protecting the economy and profit, not some niggling obsession on scientific objectivity. The economy is like Jupiter, and he ate is own children. The economy is a monster we had ALL better learn to control, not let it dominate US. That is were this is going, a total collapse of both the economy and the ecological system. When the means to providing food to 7 billion people collapses, what the hell is going to happen? THAT is were this is going, and IF we can do something about it NOW, we better try.
What is the damage that "too much CO2" will cause? How much will it cost to prevent the damage? How much will it cost to repair the damage?
Until you can get real answers for those questions, we'd rather not destroy our economy.
You just want real proof? Look around you. It is there, not in any posts here. Or sacrifice all to the all mighty economy. Look. All I ask.