CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

[hjmick]

CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

and it keeps getting better over benghazi read it a weep repub-lie tards

“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.

On October 7, 2015, Gowdy sent a response to ranking minority member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), stating that he was “disheartened at the nature and tone of Monday’s letter from your Democrat colleagues and you.”

In the letter, Gowdy referred extensively to Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time confidante and adviser to the Clintons, who served as assistant and senior adviser to Bill Clinton from August 1997 until January 2001.

In addition to Sidney Blumenthal’s business interests, Secretary Clinton also apparently received classified information from Blumenthal- information she should have known was classified at the time she received it. In one email, Blumenthal writes “Tyler spoke to a colleague currently at CIA, who told him the agency had been dependent for intelligence from [redacted due to sources and methods].”1 This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but also human lives. Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded the email to a colleague–debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.1 There may be other instances as well where Secretary Clinton passed on classified information she received from Sidney Blumenthal. [emphasis added]



However, as Newsweek reported on Sunday, the CIA informed the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday that Gowdy’s claims were false:

Indeed, according to committee correspondence reviewed by Newsweek, the CIA did tell the panel on Saturday that it had reviewed 127 emails between Clinton and her close friend and outside adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, and none of it was deemed classified.

“The CIA reviewed the material in question and informed State that it required no redactions,” the agency informed Susan Sachsman Grooms, staff director and general counsel for the panel’s Democrats, on October 17.

On Sunday, Cummings sent a letter to Gowdy to correct the public record in light of the fact that the CIA had debunked Chairman Gowdy’s accusations.

Cummings began, writing that: “On October 7, 2015, you sent me a 13-page letter making a grave new accusation against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Specifically, you accused her of compromising national security and endangering lives,” adding that, “The problem with your accusation—as with so many others during this investigation—is that you failed to check your facts before you made it, and the CIA has now informed the Select Committee that you were wrong. I believe your accusations were irresponsible, and I believe you owe the Secretary an immediate apology.”




Cummings went on to accuse Gowdy of making the false claims against Clinton in an attempt to diffuse controversy surround Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s admission that the purpose of the Benghazi hearings was to discredit Clinton.

It appears that your letter was rushed out to the press to counter the public firestorm caused by Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s stark admission that Republicans are using millions of taxpayer dollars to damage Secretary Clinton’s bid for president. However, your letter only provided further evidence of this fact.

Speaking directly to Gowdy’s accusations against Clinton, Cummings wrote:

In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:

Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.

In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:

This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.

Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.

Cummings concluded his letter, writing that Gowdy’s actions have “brought discredit” on the Benghazi investigation and has “undermine[d] the integrity” of the committee and the House of Representatives itself:

Unfortunately, the standard operating procedure of this Select Committee has become to put out information publicly that is inaccurate and out of context in order to attack Secretary Clinton for political reasons. These repeated actions bring discredit on this investigation and undermine the integrity of the Select Committee and the House of Representatives.

Plagiarist. Thief.


You should be banned for plagiarizing the work of others.


Nice, real nice loser.

 

[Care4all]

Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com

Jebus Christo, you post an article from March of 2015?

you revel in your ignorance don't you....

THE GOWDY STORY IS A LIE.....

the server was NEVER WIPED CLEAN, GOWDY WAS LYING AND SPEAKING BEFORE HE NEW THE EVIDENCE, ONCE AGAIN.

stop lying, please STOP LYING and inform yourself....

NOTHING was wiped clean, the FBI STATED NOTHING WAS WIPED from her server when they received it and they got all of her emails including her personal emails that she deleted from her email box, that were not suppose to go to the gvt archives to be saved, per the law.....per the rules.

The FBI has had ALL of her emails including the personal ones,

SINCE AUGUST OF 2015

 

[PredFan]

So, Hillary destroys evidence and the investigators can't find enough to bring charges so that makes it a GOP boondoggle? Only a democrat would be so brazenly dishonest.

That's one way to look at it.
Reality might be another.

Hey idiot!

The reality is that Clinton destroyed evidence.

So prove it. What evidence was destroyed?


A LE Officer/Deputy in making an arrest and alleging a crime has been committed provides evidence as to the time, place and event, notes the reporting person(s) and witnesses; /s/He then signs the report under penalty of perjury; the same process is completed by the prosecutor who decides on the charges to be filed after his or her review of the arrest report. You and others can claim anything you please, but with no supporting evidence, and no threat to you, you can say anything you please - you do. Of course you have no evidence since you did not see her commit a crime, which makes you just an echo in the wind.

You have to be this stupid to be a lefty.

What is stupid in my post?

Q. Have arrest reports been written
Q. Has HRC been subpoenaed before a Grand Jury
Q. Has an indictment been issued
Q. Has she been arraigned
Q. Is predfan a stupid asshole?

A. No, No, No, No and YES!

And you keep proving me right. Thanks.

 

[PredFan]

She has a D after her name. She will never be indicted or tried. You know that, I know that, she still attempted to destroy evidence. That is a fact. She's guilty, period.

 

[PredFan]

Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com

Jebus Christo, you post an article from March of 2015?

you revel in your ignorance don't you....

THE GOWDY STORY IS A LIE.....

the server was NEVER WIPED CLEAN, GOWDY WAS LYING AND SPEAKING BEFORE HE NEW THE EVIDENCE, ONCE AGAIN.

stop lying, please STOP LYING and inform yourself....

NOTHING was wiped clean, the FBI STATED NOTHING WAS WIPED from her server when they received it and they got all of her emails including her personal emails that she deleted from her email box, that were not suppose to go to the gvt archives to be saved, per the law.....per the rules.

The FBI has had ALL of her emails including the personal ones,

SINCE AUGUST OF 2015

Meh, you are just an idiot. Large type doesn't make you smarter. It does not matter if the FBI had all her e-mails. She attempted to destroy evidence and the fact that they got them anyway, does not make her innocent. Are you at least smart enough to understand that?

 

[Care4all]

Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com

Jebus Christo, you post an article from March of 2015?

you revel in your ignorance don't you....

THE GOWDY STORY IS A LIE.....

the server was NEVER WIPED CLEAN, GOWDY WAS LYING AND SPEAKING BEFORE HE NEW THE EVIDENCE, ONCE AGAIN.

stop lying, please STOP LYING and inform yourself....

NOTHING was wiped clean, the FBI STATED NOTHING WAS WIPED from her server when they received it and they got all of her emails including her personal emails that she deleted from her email box, that were not suppose to go to the gvt archives to be saved, per the law.....per the rules.

The FBI has had ALL of her emails including the personal ones,

SINCE AUGUST OF 2015

Meh, you are just an idiot. Large type doesn't make you smarter. It does not matter if the FBI had all her e-mails. She attempted to destroy evidence and the fact that they got them anyway, does not make her innocent. Are you at least smart enough to understand that?

AGAIN, That's another LIE from your beloved right wing!

Please, for the love of God and truth, INFORM YOURSELF.

The RULES AND REGS STATE that all government workers are NOT suppose to forward their personal emails to the government archives, and to only forward to them for record keeping, any of their emails that are government related or have govt documents attached.

She simply FOLLOWED the rules and did not send her personal emails to the govt National archives...as the law/rules states....

You really have not been following this have you?

 

[Iceweasel]

The RULES AND REGS STATE that all government workers are NOT suppose to forward their personal emails to the government archives, and to only forward to them for record keeping, any of their emails that are government related or have govt documents attached.

She simply FOLLOWED the rules and did not send her personal emails to the govt National archives...as the law/rules states....

You really have not been following this have you?

Spin spin spin. She mishandled classified intel then tried to cover up her incompetence. You must be a payed shill.

Fail.

 

[IsaacNewton]

I guess the real question is, are there any honest Republicans left?

Any?

 

[billyerock1991]

It's being investigated by the FBI. If they haven't made a determination yet, how can the CIA? Hillary has all her emails sent to her private server, how is it possible none were classified? And why did she delete most of them?

you've been told many times and you keep coming back with the same questions thats been answered...

as for the 127 Emails in question by Gowdy who claim that Sidney Blumenthal's emails were classified in nature in the benghazi hearings... these were the ones that Gowdy claim the CIA had said was classified ... as you can see the CIA went back and looked at these 127 emails of Sidney Blumenthal that Gowdy claimed were classified turn out not to declassified ..I realize you have a COMPREHENSION PROBLEM YOU"VE SHOWN IT IN THE PAST.... these were the Emails that Gowdy brought to the benghazi hearings, not the ones you may think have been deleted... as for these deleted emails ...you speak of if you ever paid attention you would have know that the FBI had recovered all of her erased emails in question ... as she said, they were personal and had nothing to do with the government ... which the FBI has already said they were personal in nature ... so pay attention and stop with your lying ...

 

[billyerock1991]

Hillary got 4 Americans killed, how is that not endangering American lives???????

DID you watch the Benghazi hearing at all ??? or just FOX noise ??? Hillary Clinton contacted ambassador stevens asking him if he needed additional security .... ambassador stevens himself in a email said he didn't want any more security ... the reason ambassador stevens did this he didn't want to be perceived as being heavy handed with the people who were around the embassy ... so ambassador stevens was the person who turn down the security not hillary Clinton... so by you saying hillary got 4 americans killed that would be you lying ... she did no such thing.... read the god Damn benghazi hearing its on the web in a BDF file formate ... if any one got them kill it was benghazi ambassador stevens that caused it...

 

[billyerock1991]

“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.

Okay so.. we have some asshole Democrats accusing some asshole Republicans of misdeeds, the last time something of this magnitude happened was 5 minutes ago, ALERT THE PRESS!

..... and after the press is fully alerted make sure to lay in a supply of napkins, all the hyper-partisan lemmings will need 'em to wipe the foam from their mouths.

talk being partisan or what ... here you see where Growdy had changed the document according to the CIA and not Hillary, in the hearing to fit his attempt to try and make hillary look in a bad light in the press now you want to poo poo Gowdy lying in the hearing as OK .. it typical ignorant repub-lie-tard

 

[billyerock1991]

The RULES AND REGS STATE that all government workers are NOT suppose to forward their personal emails to the government archives, and to only forward to them for record keeping, any of their emails that are government related or have govt documents attached.

She simply FOLLOWED the rules and did not send her personal emails to the govt National archives...as the law/rules states....

You really have not been following this have you?

Spin spin spin. She mishandled classified intel then tried to cover up her incompetence. You must be a payed shill.

Fail.

no she didn't and you haven't any proof she did ... all the attorney general has shown that the didn't have permission to have a private server ... as of now not one classified document has been recovered on her private server ... so stop your lying...

 

[NightFox]

“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.

Okay so.. we have some asshole Democrats accusing some asshole Republicans of misdeeds, the last time something of this magnitude happened was 5 minutes ago, ALERT THE PRESS!

..... and after the press is fully alerted make sure to lay in a supply of napkins, all the hyper-partisan lemmings will need 'em to wipe the foam from their mouths.

talk being partisan or what ... here you see where Growdy had changed the document according to the CIA and not Hillary, in the hearing to fit his attempt to try and make hillary look in a bad light in the press now you want to poo poo Gowdy lying in the hearing as OK .. it typical ignorant repub-lie-tard

Thanks, now I'm going to have to send my Gibberish to English translation device into the shop again... DICK.

 

[billyerock1991]

CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

and it keeps getting better over benghazi read it a weep repub-lie tards

“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.

On October 7, 2015, Gowdy sent a response to ranking minority member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), stating that he was “disheartened at the nature and tone of Monday’s letter from your Democrat colleagues and you.”

In the letter, Gowdy referred extensively to Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time confidante and adviser to the Clintons, who served as assistant and senior adviser to Bill Clinton from August 1997 until January 2001.

In addition to Sidney Blumenthal’s business interests, Secretary Clinton also apparently received classified information from Blumenthal- information she should have known was classified at the time she received it. In one email, Blumenthal writes “Tyler spoke to a colleague currently at CIA, who told him the agency had been dependent for intelligence from [redacted due to sources and methods].”1 This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but also human lives. Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded the email to a colleague–debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.1 There may be other instances as well where Secretary Clinton passed on classified information she received from Sidney Blumenthal. [emphasis added]



However, as Newsweek reported on Sunday, the CIA informed the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday that Gowdy’s claims were false:

Indeed, according to committee correspondence reviewed by Newsweek, the CIA did tell the panel on Saturday that it had reviewed 127 emails between Clinton and her close friend and outside adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, and none of it was deemed classified.

“The CIA reviewed the material in question and informed State that it required no redactions,” the agency informed Susan Sachsman Grooms, staff director and general counsel for the panel’s Democrats, on October 17.

On Sunday, Cummings sent a letter to Gowdy to correct the public record in light of the fact that the CIA had debunked Chairman Gowdy’s accusations.

Cummings began, writing that: “On October 7, 2015, you sent me a 13-page letter making a grave new accusation against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Specifically, you accused her of compromising national security and endangering lives,” adding that, “The problem with your accusation—as with so many others during this investigation—is that you failed to check your facts before you made it, and the CIA has now informed the Select Committee that you were wrong. I believe your accusations were irresponsible, and I believe you owe the Secretary an immediate apology.”




Cummings went on to accuse Gowdy of making the false claims against Clinton in an attempt to diffuse controversy surround Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s admission that the purpose of the Benghazi hearings was to discredit Clinton.

It appears that your letter was rushed out to the press to counter the public firestorm caused by Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s stark admission that Republicans are using millions of taxpayer dollars to damage Secretary Clinton’s bid for president. However, your letter only provided further evidence of this fact.

Speaking directly to Gowdy’s accusations against Clinton, Cummings wrote:

In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:

Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.

In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:

This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.

Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.

Cummings concluded his letter, writing that Gowdy’s actions have “brought discredit” on the Benghazi investigation and has “undermine[d] the integrity” of the committee and the House of Representatives itself:

Unfortunately, the standard operating procedure of this Select Committee has become to put out information publicly that is inaccurate and out of context in order to attack Secretary Clinton for political reasons. These repeated actions bring discredit on this investigation and undermine the integrity of the Select Committee and the House of Representatives.

Plagiarist. Thief.


You should be banned for plagiarizing the work of others.


Nice, real nice loser.

I never claimed this as my work ... I clearly said, and it keeps getting better over benghazi, read it a weep repub-lie tards ... where do you see me saying this is my work??? you should be banned for being ignorant ... I guess you can't stand that the article puts repub-lie-tards like you in their place as being liars...

 

[billyerock1991]

“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.

Okay so.. we have some asshole Democrats accusing some asshole Republicans of misdeeds, the last time something of this magnitude happened was 5 minutes ago, ALERT THE PRESS!

..... and after the press is fully alerted make sure to lay in a supply of napkins, all the hyper-partisan lemmings will need 'em to wipe the foam from their mouths.

talk being partisan or what ... here you see where Growdy had changed the document according to the CIA and not Hillary, in the hearing to fit his attempt to try and make hillary look in a bad light in the press now you want to poo poo Gowdy lying in the hearing as OK .. it typical ignorant repub-lie-tard

Thanks, now I'm going to have to send my Gibberish to English translation device into the shop again... DICK.

you hate it when your stupidity out shines us all huh!!!!

 

[Iceweasel]

It's being investigated by the FBI. If they haven't made a determination yet, how can the CIA? Hillary has all her emails sent to her private server, how is it possible none were classified? And why did she delete most of them?

you've been told many times and you keep coming back with the same questions thats been answered...

as for the 127 Emails in question by Gowdy who claim that Sidney Blumenthal's emails were classified in nature in the benghazi hearings... these were the ones that Gowdy claim the CIA had said was classified ... as you can see the CIA went back and looked at these 127 emails of Sidney Blumenthal that Gowdy claimed were classified turn out not to declassified ..I realize you have a COMPREHENSION PROBLEM YOU"VE SHOWN IT IN THE PAST.... these were the Emails that Gowdy brought to the benghazi hearings, not the ones you may think have been deleted... as for these deleted emails ...you speak of if you ever paid attention you would have know that the FBI had recovered all of her erased emails in question ... as she said, they were personal and had nothing to do with the government ... which the FBI has already said they were personal in nature ... so pay attention and stop with your lying ...

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

 

[billyerock1991]

Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com

Jebus Christo, you post an article from March of 2015?

you revel in your ignorance don't you....

THE GOWDY STORY IS A LIE.....

the server was NEVER WIPED CLEAN, GOWDY WAS LYING AND SPEAKING BEFORE HE NEW THE EVIDENCE, ONCE AGAIN.

stop lying, please STOP LYING and inform yourself....

NOTHING was wiped clean, the FBI STATED NOTHING WAS WIPED from her server when they received it and they got all of her emails including her personal emails that she deleted from her email box, that were not suppose to go to the gvt archives to be saved, per the law.....per the rules.

The FBI has had ALL of her emails including the personal ones,

SINCE AUGUST OF 2015

they just don't get it

 

[Iceweasel]

Hillary Clinton deleted e-mails. She is guilty of destroying evidence and obstruction of justice.
Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server - CNNPolitics.com

Jebus Christo, you post an article from March of 2015?

you revel in your ignorance don't you....

THE GOWDY STORY IS A LIE.....

the server was NEVER WIPED CLEAN, GOWDY WAS LYING AND SPEAKING BEFORE HE NEW THE EVIDENCE, ONCE AGAIN.

stop lying, please STOP LYING and inform yourself....

NOTHING was wiped clean, the FBI STATED NOTHING WAS WIPED from her server when they received it and they got all of her emails including her personal emails that she deleted from her email box, that were not suppose to go to the gvt archives to be saved, per the law.....per the rules.

The FBI has had ALL of her emails including the personal ones,

SINCE AUGUST OF 2015

they just don't get it

Yes we do. You will polish Hillary's turds until your arms fall off. The only question is if it's voluntary or a paid position.

 

[billyerock1991]

It's being investigated by the FBI. If they haven't made a determination yet, how can the CIA? Hillary has all her emails sent to her private server, how is it possible none were classified? And why did she delete most of them?

you've been told many times and you keep coming back with the same questions thats been answered...

as for the 127 Emails in question by Gowdy who claim that Sidney Blumenthal's emails were classified in nature in the benghazi hearings... these were the ones that Gowdy claim the CIA had said was classified ... as you can see the CIA went back and looked at these 127 emails of Sidney Blumenthal that Gowdy claimed were classified turn out not to declassified ..I realize you have a COMPREHENSION PROBLEM YOU"VE SHOWN IT IN THE PAST.... these were the Emails that Gowdy brought to the benghazi hearings, not the ones you may think have been deleted... as for these deleted emails ...you speak of if you ever paid attention you would have know that the FBI had recovered all of her erased emails in question ... as she said, they were personal and had nothing to do with the government ... which the FBI has already said they were personal in nature ... so pay attention and stop with your lying ...

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

no she hasn't ... not the CIA of the FBI has said she did ... the only place you have received this type of information is from the press saying and heres a big word that you keep missing "ALLEDGE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS" ... so you run with this assumption that they have found some ... they haven't as of yet .. so stop your insinuation or lying

 

[NightFox]

“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.

Okay so.. we have some asshole Democrats accusing some asshole Republicans of misdeeds, the last time something of this magnitude happened was 5 minutes ago, ALERT THE PRESS!

..... and after the press is fully alerted make sure to lay in a supply of napkins, all the hyper-partisan lemmings will need 'em to wipe the foam from their mouths.

talk being partisan or what ... here you see where Growdy had changed the document according to the CIA and not Hillary, in the hearing to fit his attempt to try and make hillary look in a bad light in the press now you want to poo poo Gowdy lying in the hearing as OK .. it typical ignorant repub-lie-tard

Thanks, now I'm going to have to send my Gibberish to English translation device into the shop again... DICK.

you hate it when your stupidity out shines us all huh!!!!

Sure , if you say so, of course saying so might be more effective if you put forth at least a modicum of effort to clean all the spittle from your lips prior to the act.

"I love and treasure individuals as I meet them; I loathe and despise the groups they identify with and belong to." -- George Carlin