Christians now are banned under Biden new rule from adopting children

What about testimony from transgenders who were denied therapy and were suicidal?
Overwhelmingly, transgenders wish they could have received therapy when they were younger
Is it a contest to see how many on each side die of suicide the most often?

Sexual development is the last stage of development. Let them finish it before permanently sterilizing them.

A child that is not old enough to make the decision to have sex is not old enough to make the decision to change their sex.

Again, you people should be behind bars.

Do you feel remotely bad for lying about this not going on with children? Don't get me wrong, I understand why you lied. Anyone would be ashamed for being an apologist for such Leftists crimes.
 
Last edited:

Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN), has introduced the Sensible Adoption for Every (SAFE) Home Act, aimed at preventing child welfare agencies from denying prospective adopters who disagree with a child’s LGBTQ status, including medical treatment inconsistent with their biological sex.

This comes after the Department of Health and Human Services announced a rule to ensure LGBTQI+ youth are placed in accepting environments.

“The Biden administration is cruelly preventing countless children in the foster care and adoption system from going to loving homes just because parents are opposed to irreversible sex change procedures on kids,” Banks said.

“This isn’t a liberal or conservative issue. This is just plain wrong, and every sane person knows it.”

The rule “would require that child welfare agencies ensure that each child in their care who identifies as LGBTQI+ receive a safe and appropriate placement and services that help them thrive.”


“The proposed rule would protect LGBTQI+ youth by placing them in environments free of hostility, mistreatment, or abuse based on the child’s LGBTQI+ status. And the proposed rule would require that caregivers for LGBTQI+ children are properly and fully trained to provide for the needs of the child related to the child’s self-identified sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression,” the HHS website reads.

The notion that the Left wants to leave such issues as transitioning children up the parent is just a plain lie, and this is proof.

The Left will only allow parenting if they agree with the parenting.

In other words, you are either a tool of the Left or you have no say or power within society.
Just a few points:

Your thread tittle is a vicious and dangerous lie . There is nothing in the Department of Health and Human Services rule that bars Christians from adopting children nor is the Bidens administrations opposition to Jim Banks’ bill in any way Anti Christian.

Not all Christians oppose and reject gay and trans kids or reject them for who they are. More importantly, the vast majority of children who are free for adoption are not gay or trans.

Matching adoptive parents to children is a complex and lengthy process that is overseen by mental health professionals and social workers experienced in adoptions matters. I know. I was a social worker in an adotion agency

Adopting a child is not like going to the local animal shelter and picking out a dog. Children and prospective adoptive parents are given time to develop a relationship. There are extended pre-placement visits. Any child old enough to talk is given an opportunity to express how they feel about the new family.

Does anyone really think that the law should mandate that an adoption agency must approve an adoption when a chid does not feel accepted and loved for who they are, and where the adoptive family does not respect the identity of the child? This law proposed by Banks basically says that the agency must say “ Well kid, they want you so this is where you have to go.....your needs and feeing do not matter. ” The government has no business sticking It's nose into the process . The best interest of the child is always first and formost and this ignorant and misguided legislation is not in their best interest


Those ”loving homes" that Banks claims are being denied the ability to adopt some children would in fact be hell hole for gender non conforming, trans and gay kids who would be driven to despair and suicide at the hands of Christo Fascist adaptive parents. Kids may well be subjected to abusive convergence therapy, denied gender affirming care, or otherwise try to “fix or “cure “ these kids because of their bigoted theocratic beliefs

The DHHS rule as written is absolutly necessary andappropriate as written. Children must be provided age appropriate care and support. Young children are not going to be subjected to gender reassignmnet or any radical irreversable proceedures. Care is always in keeping with best mental health and medical practices

HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU PEOPLE?
 
Last edited:
The notion that the Left wants to leave such issues as transitioning children up the parent is just a plain lie, and this is proof.

The Left will only allow parenting if they agree with the parenting.
Bullshit! The decision has nothing to do with what we on the left agree with or disagrre with We want to leave it up to the child , and the mental health /medical professionals with imput from the parents. The parents have a role, but as with any medical of mental health issue, they must act in the best interest of the child and can be subject to being over ruled or charged with medical neglect.
 
Bullshit! The decision has nothing to do with what we on the left agree with or disagrre with We want to leave it up to the child , and the mental health /medical professionals with imput from the parents. The parents have a role, but as with any medical of mental health issue, they must act in the best interest of the child and can be subject to being over ruled or charged with medical neglect.
Like Joe Kennedy getting his daughter a lobotomy?

:auiqs.jpg:
Bullshit! The decision has nothing to do with what we on the left agree with or disagrre with We want to leave it up to the child , and the mental health /medical professionals with imput from the parents. The parents have a role, but as with any medical of mental health issue, they must act in the best interest of the child and can be subject to being over ruled or charged with medical neglect.
Just like Joe Kennedy getting his daughter a lobotomy?

1. Child mentally ill. Check.

2. Consult experts. Check

3 Drill holes in the child's head to control behavior. Check.

I'm thinking that would be preferable than having your balls cut off.

Luckily lobotomies are seen as archaic and inhumane and no longer done by the "experts".
 
Like Joe Kennedy getting his daughter a lobotomy?

:auiqs.jpg:

Just like Joe Kennedy getting his daughter a lobotomy?

1. Child mentally ill. Check.

2. Consult experts. Check

3 Drill holes in the child's head to control behavior. Check.

I'm thinking that would be preferable than having your balls cut off.

Luckily lobotomies are seen as archaic and inhumane and no longer done by the "experts".
Thank you for definitively answering the question that I posed in bold type at the end of post 22
 
Just a few points:

Your thread tittle is a vicious and dangerous lie . There is nothing in the Department of Health and Human Services rule that bars Christians from adopting children nor is the Bidens administrations opposition to Jim Banks’ bill in any way Anti Christian.

Not all Christians oppose and reject gay and trans kids or reject them for who they are. More importantly, the vast majority of children who are free for adoption are not gay or trans.

Matching adoptive parents to children is a complex and lengthy process that is overseen by mental health professionals and social workers experienced in adoptions matters. I know. I was a social worker in an adotion agency

Adopting a child is not like going to the local animal shelter and picking out a dog. Children and prospective adoptive parents are given time to develop a relationship. There are extended pre-placement visits. Any child old enough to talk is given an opportunity to express how they feel about the new family.

Does anyone really think that the law should mandate that an adoption agency must approve an adoption when a chid does not feel accepted and loved for who they are, and where the adoptive family does not respect the identity of the child? This law proposed by Banks basically says that the agency must say “ Well kid, they want you so this is where you have to go.....your needs and feeing do not matter. ” The government has no business sticking It's nose into the process . The best interest of the child is always first and formost and this ignorant and misguided legislation is not in their best interest


Those ”loving homes" that Banks claims are being denied the ability to adopt some children would in fact be hell hole for gender non conforming, trans and gay kids who would be driven to despair and suicide at the hands of Christo Fascist adaptive parents. Kids may well be subjected to abusive convergence therapy, denied gender affirming care, or otherwise try to “fix or “cure “ these kids because of their bigoted theocratic beliefs

The DHHS rule as written is absolutly necessary andappropriate as written. Children must be provided age appropriate care and support. Young children are not going to be subjected to gender reassignmnet or any radical irreversable proceedures. Care is always in keeping with best mental health and medical practices

HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU PEOPLE?
You are free to be a Christian and adopt children by either

1. Lying, saying you agree with the Left wing gender cult ideology but don't really.

2. Sell your soul to the Left and agree with everything the gender cult throws at you.

Feel better?

As for what is dangerous, it is the Left as they are nothing but fascists who groom children for a living and scoff at any outrage over it.
 
You are free to be a Christian and adopt children by either

1. Lying, saying you agree with the Left wing gender cult ideology but don't really.

2. Sell your soul to the Left and agree with everything the gender cult throws at you.

Feel better?

As for what is dangerous, it is the Left as they are nothing but fascists who groom children for a living and scoff at any outrage over it.
Thank you again
 

Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN), has introduced the Sensible Adoption for Every (SAFE) Home Act, aimed at preventing child welfare agencies from denying prospective adopters who disagree with a child’s LGBTQ status, including medical treatment inconsistent with their biological sex.

This comes after the Department of Health and Human Services announced a rule to ensure LGBTQI+ youth are placed in accepting environments.

“The Biden administration is cruelly preventing countless children in the foster care and adoption system from going to loving homes just because parents are opposed to irreversible sex change procedures on kids,” Banks said.

“This isn’t a liberal or conservative issue. This is just plain wrong, and every sane person knows it.”

The rule “would require that child welfare agencies ensure that each child in their care who identifies as LGBTQI+ receive a safe and appropriate placement and services that help them thrive.”


“The proposed rule would protect LGBTQI+ youth by placing them in environments free of hostility, mistreatment, or abuse based on the child’s LGBTQI+ status. And the proposed rule would require that caregivers for LGBTQI+ children are properly and fully trained to provide for the needs of the child related to the child’s self-identified sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression,” the HHS website reads.

The notion that the Left wants to leave such issues as transitioning children up the parent is just a plain lie, and this is proof.

The Left will only allow parenting if they agree with the parenting.

In other words, you are either a tool of the Left or you have no say or power within society.
These dichotomies are of your invention. "Tool of the left".. "christian"... whiny horseshit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top