Choking Nemo

mamooth

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2012
33,785
16,843
1,600
Indianapolis, Indiana
No biggy. Just life in the oceans.

It May Soon Be Too Late to Save the Seas
---
The study confirmed what scientists have long observed - that climate change is causing a drop in the amount of oxygen dissolved in oceans in some parts of the world. But the study's central conclusion is what is so alarming - the effects of this drop in the amount of oxygen all marine life require will start to become evident in just 15 years or so. At some point, the drop in the ocean's oxygen levels will leave marine life struggling to breathe.
---

And hilariously, the same crowd that screams "The oceans are outgassing CO2 because of warming!" will be the ones screaming that rising ocean temperatures won't lower oxygen levels.
 
Oh look another AGW prediction based on models!

The observation is based on observing models..

Go figure the AGW cult would latch on to this..
 
Well maybe if we can take care of the pesky glaciers that have covered the globe to the Tropic of Capricorn, as predicted by you people, we can find time to rescue Nemo the fantasy fish.

How would that be?
 
Well maybe if we can take care of the pesky glaciers that have covered the globe to the Tropic of Capricorn, as predicted by you people, we can find time to rescue Nemo the fantasy fish.

How would that be?
tumblr_inline_mmj7kcbZbe1qz4rgp[1].gif
 
No biggy. Just life in the oceans.

It May Soon Be Too Late to Save the Seas
---
The study confirmed what scientists have long observed - that climate change is causing a drop in the amount of oxygen dissolved in oceans in some parts of the world. But the study's central conclusion is what is so alarming - the effects of this drop in the amount of oxygen all marine life require will start to become evident in just 15 years or so. At some point, the drop in the ocean's oxygen levels will leave marine life struggling to breathe.
---

And hilariously, the same crowd that screams "The oceans are outgassing CO2 because of warming!" will be the ones screaming that rising ocean temperatures won't lower oxygen levels.

See, that's the issue with your side, you take a solid scientific concept, i.e. the solubility of oxygen in water, and then go leaping to conclusions that "it may be already too late", and add in a bit of smug "we told you so", even though its decades before we can see if you were right or wrong about it.
 
Well maybe if we can take care of the pesky glaciers that have covered the globe to the Tropic of Capricorn, as predicted by you people, we can find time to rescue Nemo the fantasy fish.

Only you denier kooks were predicting an ice age. Deniers just lie about that lot, by pretending the real scientists weren't predicting warming.

You and your denier heroes have failed hard at every bit of the science for over 40 years now. That's why you're laughed at and ignored.

In contrast, the real scientists have been spot-on correct with everything during that same period. That's why they have such credibility, and it's why the rational people pay attention to them.
 
Well maybe if we can take care of the pesky glaciers that have covered the globe to the Tropic of Capricorn, as predicted by you people, we can find time to rescue Nemo the fantasy fish.

Only you denier kooks were predicting an ice age. Deniers just lie about that lot, by pretending the real scientists weren't predicting warming.

You and your denier heroes have failed hard at every bit of the science for over 40 years now. That's why you're laughed at and ignored.

In contrast, the real scientists have been spot-on correct with everything during that same period. That's why they have such credibility, and it's why the rational people pay attention to them.

The only kooks are, and have always been, the lunatics who maintain that global warming is caused by man, and a sign that the planet is dying.

You guys are lunatics, everybody knows it. Even you know it.
 
Well maybe if we can take care of the pesky glaciers that have covered the globe to the Tropic of Capricorn, as predicted by you people, we can find time to rescue Nemo the fantasy fish.

Only you denier kooks were predicting an ice age. Deniers just lie about that lot, by pretending the real scientists weren't predicting warming.

You and your denier heroes have failed hard at every bit of the science for over 40 years now. That's why you're laughed at and ignored.

In contrast, the real scientists have been spot-on correct with everything during that same period. That's why they have such credibility, and it's why the rational people pay attention to them.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...predictions-haunt-the-global-warming-industry
 
When I point out the denier history of failed predictions, a link which confirms that was not your best option.

That link didn't just talk about failed denier cooling predictions, of course. It also talked about a bunch of stuff that had nothing to do with climate scientist predictions. But then, since all the actual predictions are good, I suppose you had to deflect somehow.

Now, back to the science.

Warmer water can hold less dissolved gas of any type.

Oxygen is a gas.

The oceans are warming.

Hence, the oceans will be capable of holding less dissolved oxygen.

Y'all keeping up so far?

It doesn't mean every fish will die. It does mean more spots will start forming where fish can't survive.
 
When I point out the denier history of failed predictions, a link which confirms that was not your best option.

That link didn't just talk about failed denier cooling predictions, of course. It also talked about a bunch of stuff that had nothing to do with climate scientist predictions. But then, since all the actual predictions are good, I suppose you had to deflect somehow.

Now, back to the science.

Warmer water can hold less dissolved gas of any type.

Oxygen is a gas.

The oceans are warming.

Hence, the oceans will be capable of holding less dissolved oxygen.

Y'all keeping up so far?

It doesn't mean every fish will die. It does mean more spots will start forming where fish can't survive.

Nothing you postulate indicates anthropogenic causation.
 
No biggy. Just life in the oceans.

It May Soon Be Too Late to Save the Seas
---
The study confirmed what scientists have long observed - that climate change is causing a drop in the amount of oxygen dissolved in oceans in some parts of the world. But the study's central conclusion is what is so alarming - the effects of this drop in the amount of oxygen all marine life require will start to become evident in just 15 years or so. At some point, the drop in the ocean's oxygen levels will leave marine life struggling to breathe.
---

And hilariously, the same crowd that screams "The oceans are outgassing CO2 because of warming!" will be the ones screaming that rising ocean temperatures won't lower oxygen levels.
OOOOHGHHH NOOOOOO!


The SKY is FALLING.

Fucking idiot.
 
No biggy. Just life in the oceans.

It May Soon Be Too Late to Save the Seas
---
The study confirmed what scientists have long observed - that climate change is causing a drop in the amount of oxygen dissolved in oceans in some parts of the world. But the study's central conclusion is what is so alarming - the effects of this drop in the amount of oxygen all marine life require will start to become evident in just 15 years or so. At some point, the drop in the ocean's oxygen levels will leave marine life struggling to breathe.
---

And hilariously, the same crowd that screams "The oceans are outgassing CO2 because of warming!" will be the ones screaming that rising ocean temperatures won't lower oxygen levels.







Ummmm "IT MAY BE TOO LATE TO SAVE" whatever the hell you people scream about on any particular day. But do please note...it's YOU screaming.
 
Last edited:
Well maybe if we can take care of the pesky glaciers that have covered the globe to the Tropic of Capricorn, as predicted by you people, we can find time to rescue Nemo the fantasy fish.

Only you denier kooks were predicting an ice age. Deniers just lie about that lot, by pretending the real scientists weren't predicting warming.

You and your denier heroes have failed hard at every bit of the science for over 40 years now. That's why you're laughed at and ignored.

In contrast, the real scientists have been spot-on correct with everything during that same period. That's why they have such credibility, and it's why the rational people pay attention to them.






Ummmm, I hate to break it to you but the same morons that are claiming AGW today, are the exact same people who were claiming we were heading for an ice age in the 1960's and '70's. Do try and keep up you hysterical ninny!
 
Well maybe if we can take care of the pesky glaciers that have covered the globe to the Tropic of Capricorn, as predicted by you people, we can find time to rescue Nemo the fantasy fish.

Only you denier kooks were predicting an ice age. Deniers just lie about that lot, by pretending the real scientists weren't predicting warming.

You and your denier heroes have failed hard at every bit of the science for over 40 years now. That's why you're laughed at and ignored.

In contrast, the real scientists have been spot-on correct with everything during that same period. That's why they have such credibility, and it's why the rational people pay attention to them.






Ummmm, I hate to break it to you but the same morons that are claiming AGW today, are the exact same people who were claiming we were heading for an ice age in the 1960's and '70's. Do try and keep up you hysterical ninny!
Hey, it's not a matter of "if" the Earth is going to cool, catastrophically, it's a matter of when. Hopefully it will be long after myself and my loved ones are dead and gone.


Global warming, my ass. Try some global cooling. Try having the vast majority of the Earth's granary crops disappear. Try having most of the world's food supply cease to exist.Do you really want to see Mad Max and the Walking Dead in real life? That's what global cooling will do.

Global warming would simply take us back to the climatic OPTIMUM.
 
Last edited:
The Holocene Climatic Optimum took several thousand years to reach it's +4C. Do you think it will make no difference that we will reach it in 200?
 
The Holocene Climatic Optimum took several thousand years to reach it's +4C. Do you think it will make no difference that we will reach it in 200?







Untrue. Best estimates are it was 300 to 500 years. And that is based on little real data. Far more likely is that it was just as fast as the MWP which witnessed warming over a few decades.
 
The Milankovitch Cycles, the driving force behind the Holocene Climatic Optimum
350px-Orbital_variation.svg.png


The period itself is estimated to have occurred somewhere between 9,000 to 5,000 years ago. Yet you think it's inception is known to be 300 to 500 years? Show us data that supports your claim.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top