Chief Justice Roberts Rejects Bid To Stop Bump Stock Ban. All Bump Stocks Illegal As Of Tuesday

You think the Vegas shooter cared, dumbfuck?
Yes retard, else he would have used fully automatic weapons. But he didn't, because they are harder to get, because they are illegal. Duh,moron.
The LV shooter had more than sufficient means to buy a M134 minigun and 12,000 rounds (2 minutes) of 7.62x51; he would have been able to do so legally as he had no disqualifying events on his record.
This would have easily resulted the death of several hundred people.
Duh, moron.
 
You think the Vegas shooter cared, dumbfuck?
Yes retard, else he would have used fully automatic weapons. But he didn't, because they are harder to get, because they are illegal. Duh,moron.
The LV shooter had more than sufficient means to buy a M134 minigun and 12,000 rounds (2 minutes) of 7.62x51; he would have been able to do so legally as he had no disqualifying events on his record.
This would have easily resulted the death of several hundred people.
Duh, moron.
But he didnt retard,because that was more expensive and harder to do. Duh, idiots...
 
You think the Vegas shooter cared, dumbfuck?
Yes retard, else he would have used fully automatic weapons. But he didn't, because they are harder to get, because they are illegal. Duh,moron.
The LV shooter had more than sufficient means to buy a M134 minigun and 12,000 rounds (2 minutes) of 7.62x51; he would have been able to do so legally as he had no disqualifying events on his record.
This would have easily resulted the death of several hundred people.
Duh, moron.
But he didnt retard,because that was more expensive and harder to do. Duh, idiots...
How do you know?
 
You think the Vegas shooter cared, dumbfuck?
Yes retard, else he would have used fully automatic weapons. But he didn't, because they are harder to get, because they are illegal. Duh,moron.
The LV shooter had more than sufficient means to buy a M134 minigun and 12,000 rounds (2 minutes) of 7.62x51; he would have been able to do so legally as he had no disqualifying events on his record.
This would have easily resulted the death of several hundred people.
Duh, moron.
But he didnt retard,because that was more expensive and harder to do. Duh, idiots...
you got a lot of nerve calling others ignorant retards after claiming he didnt because its illegal,,,its not illegal to own full auto
 
You think the Vegas shooter cared, dumbfuck?
Yes retard, else he would have used fully automatic weapons. But he didn't, because they are harder to get, because they are illegal. Duh,moron.
The LV shooter had more than sufficient means to buy a M134 minigun and 12,000 rounds (2 minutes) of 7.62x51; he would have been able to do so legally as he had no disqualifying events on his record.
This would have easily resulted the death of several hundred people.
Duh, moron.
But he didnt retard,because that was more expensive and harder to do. Duh, idiots...
you got a lot of nerve calling others ignorant retards after claiming he didnt because its illegal,,,its not illegal to own full auto
Anti-gun loons are not known for their grasp of facts.
 
You think the Vegas shooter cared, dumbfuck?
Yes retard, else he would have used fully automatic weapons. But he didn't, because they are harder to get, because they are illegal. Duh,moron.
The LV shooter had more than sufficient means to buy a M134 minigun and 12,000 rounds (2 minutes) of 7.62x51; he would have been able to do so legally as he had no disqualifying events on his record.
This would have easily resulted the death of several hundred people.
Duh, moron.
But he didnt retard,because that was more expensive and harder to do. Duh, idiots...
you got a lot of nerve calling others ignorant retards after claiming he didnt because its illegal,,,its not illegal to own full auto

Depends on the type of weapon, as well as what the various state regs say. And no, it's not easy to get a license to own one, nor is it cheap.

Here Are The Actual Federal Laws Regulating Machine Guns In The U.S. - The Federalist

Under the NFA, it is illegal for any private civilian to own any fully automatic weapons manufactured after May 19, 1986. Only certain types of FFL/SOTs may make them, and then only for purchase by qualified state and federal agencies. There are no exceptions. According to the ATF’s official handbook on NFA laws and regulations, it’s not even legal to make new replacement parts for pre-1986 machine guns: “There is no exception allowing for the lawful production, transfer, possession, or use of a post-May 18, 1986 machinegun receiver as a replacement receiver on a weapon produced prior to May 19, 1986.”


So what about pre-1986 machine guns? Are civilians permitted to own those? Yes, with a host of exceptions. The pre-1986 machine guns may be sold only by a FFL/SOT and must be registered with the ATF. Easy peasy, right? Not really. The process of registering a NFA item with the ATF is costly, invasive, and time-consuming. Federal law requires extensive background checks of anyone wishing to own a NFA item such as a machine gun. If you wanted to purchase a machine gun today, it would take close to a year, and you would be required to submit fingerprints and a photo to accompany your background check. Each NFA item also requires its own tax stamp, which costs $200. Once the ATF decides that an individual is permitted by law to own a NFA item, it adds that individual’s name, address, and biographical information to a federal gun registry and matches it to the serial number of the licensed NFA item. This goes for every item listed in the NFA, not just machine guns. Individuals with NFA items are then required to notify the ATF when they move and any time they plan to travel outside their state of residence with the NFA item.


And that’s just the federal registration process. We haven’t even discussed the cost of purchasing a legal machine gun. If you can find a legal, ATF-stamped, pre-1986 machine gun for less than $10,000, then you’re a miracle worker. A legal NFA sear — the machined part of the trigger group that makes a firearm capable of fully automatic firing — can cost anywhere from $15,000 to $50,000. And lest you think that any random yokel can just head into the garage and cobble together functional full auto sear, think again. While it is indeed possible, the tools and know-how required to precisely mill the sear, not to mention the myriad other necessary modifications, are in relatively short supply.
 
You think the Vegas shooter cared, dumbfuck?
Yes retard, else he would have used fully automatic weapons. But he didn't, because they are harder to get, because they are illegal. Duh,moron.
The LV shooter had more than sufficient means to buy a M134 minigun and 12,000 rounds (2 minutes) of 7.62x51; he would have been able to do so legally as he had no disqualifying events on his record.
This would have easily resulted the death of several hundred people.
Duh, moron.
But he didnt retard,because that was more expensive and harder to do. Duh, idiots...
you got a lot of nerve calling others ignorant retards after claiming he didnt because its illegal,,,its not illegal to own full auto

Depends on the type of weapon, as well as what the various state regs say. And no, it's not easy to get a license to own one, nor is it cheap.

Here Are The Actual Federal Laws Regulating Machine Guns In The U.S. - The Federalist

Under the NFA, it is illegal for any private civilian to own any fully automatic weapons manufactured after May 19, 1986. Only certain types of FFL/SOTs may make them, and then only for purchase by qualified state and federal agencies. There are no exceptions. According to the ATF’s official handbook on NFA laws and regulations, it’s not even legal to make new replacement parts for pre-1986 machine guns: “There is no exception allowing for the lawful production, transfer, possession, or use of a post-May 18, 1986 machinegun receiver as a replacement receiver on a weapon produced prior to May 19, 1986.”


So what about pre-1986 machine guns? Are civilians permitted to own those? Yes, with a host of exceptions. The pre-1986 machine guns may be sold only by a FFL/SOT and must be registered with the ATF. Easy peasy, right? Not really. The process of registering a NFA item with the ATF is costly, invasive, and time-consuming. Federal law requires extensive background checks of anyone wishing to own a NFA item such as a machine gun. If you wanted to purchase a machine gun today, it would take close to a year, and you would be required to submit fingerprints and a photo to accompany your background check. Each NFA item also requires its own tax stamp, which costs $200. Once the ATF decides that an individual is permitted by law to own a NFA item, it adds that individual’s name, address, and biographical information to a federal gun registry and matches it to the serial number of the licensed NFA item. This goes for every item listed in the NFA, not just machine guns. Individuals with NFA items are then required to notify the ATF when they move and any time they plan to travel outside their state of residence with the NFA item.


And that’s just the federal registration process. We haven’t even discussed the cost of purchasing a legal machine gun. If you can find a legal, ATF-stamped, pre-1986 machine gun for less than $10,000, then you’re a miracle worker. A legal NFA sear — the machined part of the trigger group that makes a firearm capable of fully automatic firing — can cost anywhere from $15,000 to $50,000. And lest you think that any random yokel can just head into the garage and cobble together functional full auto sear, think again. While it is indeed possible, the tools and know-how required to precisely mill the sear, not to mention the myriad other necessary modifications, are in relatively short supply.


this law is in violation of the 2nd amendment,,,
 
You think the Vegas shooter cared, dumbfuck?
Yes retard, else he would have used fully automatic weapons. But he didn't, because they are harder to get, because they are illegal. Duh,moron.
The LV shooter had more than sufficient means to buy a M134 minigun and 12,000 rounds (2 minutes) of 7.62x51; he would have been able to do so legally as he had no disqualifying events on his record.
This would have easily resulted the death of several hundred people.
Duh, moron.
But he didnt retard,because that was more expensive and harder to do. Duh, idiots...
you got a lot of nerve calling others ignorant retards after claiming he didnt because its illegal,,,its not illegal to own full auto
Depends on the type of weapon, as well as what the various state regs say. And no, it's not easy to get a license to own one, nor is it cheap.
The LV shooter sold have easily purchased an M60.
Or M2HB.
Or minigun.
 

Forum List

Back
Top