Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
/-----/ "that is not what the right wing advocates. " Yes it is. It describes our core belief.that is not what the right wing advocates. they only advocate tax cuts for the rich even though we are running massive deficits, and cuts to social services for the poor. any leftover general welfare funds should be used to fix potholes./----/ If the food stamp roles are decreasing what's wrong with reducing the budget? Do you maintain your grocery budget even though you cut back on the size of your meals or the kids move out of the house?tax cuts for the Rich and cuts to social services for the poor?/——/ If socialized countries had to pay for their own defense 100% then they would have to roll back the socialist giveaways. You can’t have both.Capitalism’s greatest inherent flaw is that as decades pass, widening income disparity will inevitably get worse. The rich become richer, and the poor become more poor. The middle class shrinks. The only way to prevent this is with government intervention, i.e. socialism. Capitalism of course isn’t a failure - the US would not be the juggernaut it is now if it weren’t for a private market. However, that does not mean the quality of life for most won’t get worse over time.
Socialism is a very broad term. To simplify the definition, it is a concept that involves the people funding (tax revenue) and owning (utilizing) government services. This is why every nation on earth - including the US - has a socialist backbone. Any service the government provides that’s funded by tax revenue and is utilized by the people is socialism.
The definition of socialism has nothing to do with corrupt leadership in a given government. Venezuela is failing because of the country’s leadership. Socialism’s core definition has nothing to do with a dictatorship government.
Nordic countries are social democratic countries. This means more services apply the the well being of the population. These people have the best quality of life according to international polling. That is something that is diminishing in America. However, that doesn’t mean the concept is the antithesis of capitalism. Socialism can be the framework of a capitalist system. Socialism is just needed to make sure a capitalistic system provides benefit to the well being of the population as a whole.
Food stamp rolls plummet in states that restore work requirements ...
www.foxnews.com/.../food-stamp-rolls-plummet-in-states-that-restore-work-requirement...
Jul 4, 2017 - After the food stamp rolls swelled for years under the Obama administration, fresh figures show a dramatic reduction in states that recently have moved to restore work requirements. States were allowed to waive those rules for able-bodied adults thanks to the 2009 economic ...
they only advocate tax cuts for the rich even though we are running massive deficits, and cuts to social services for the poor./-----/ "that is not what the right wing advocates. " Yes it is. It describes our core belief.that is not what the right wing advocates. they only advocate tax cuts for the rich even though we are running massive deficits, and cuts to social services for the poor. any leftover general welfare funds should be used to fix potholes./----/ If the food stamp roles are decreasing what's wrong with reducing the budget? Do you maintain your grocery budget even though you cut back on the size of your meals or the kids move out of the house?tax cuts for the Rich and cuts to social services for the poor?/——/ If socialized countries had to pay for their own defense 100% then they would have to roll back the socialist giveaways. You can’t have both.Capitalism’s greatest inherent flaw is that as decades pass, widening income disparity will inevitably get worse. The rich become richer, and the poor become more poor. The middle class shrinks. The only way to prevent this is with government intervention, i.e. socialism. Capitalism of course isn’t a failure - the US would not be the juggernaut it is now if it weren’t for a private market. However, that does not mean the quality of life for most won’t get worse over time.
Socialism is a very broad term. To simplify the definition, it is a concept that involves the people funding (tax revenue) and owning (utilizing) government services. This is why every nation on earth - including the US - has a socialist backbone. Any service the government provides that’s funded by tax revenue and is utilized by the people is socialism.
The definition of socialism has nothing to do with corrupt leadership in a given government. Venezuela is failing because of the country’s leadership. Socialism’s core definition has nothing to do with a dictatorship government.
Nordic countries are social democratic countries. This means more services apply the the well being of the population. These people have the best quality of life according to international polling. That is something that is diminishing in America. However, that doesn’t mean the concept is the antithesis of capitalism. Socialism can be the framework of a capitalist system. Socialism is just needed to make sure a capitalistic system provides benefit to the well being of the population as a whole.
Food stamp rolls plummet in states that restore work requirements ...
www.foxnews.com/.../food-stamp-rolls-plummet-in-states-that-restore-work-requirement...
Jul 4, 2017 - After the food stamp rolls swelled for years under the Obama administration, fresh figures show a dramatic reduction in states that recently have moved to restore work requirements. States were allowed to waive those rules for able-bodied adults thanks to the 2009 economic ...
"any leftover general welfare funds should be used to fix potholes" Maybe a good idea for individual household budgets. We needed a new fridge and had the cash saved up. We found one on sale and saved enough for a new microwave that was on its last leg. But things don't work that way in Washington.
/----/ You're just repeating Prog talking points. Try backing up your claims with some facts like I did.Capitalism doesn't care about rights, only capital. We know better, in modern times./----/ It's the complete opposite, Commie.under True Capitalism, capital matters not morals or morality.You mean nations where Drug Lords take charge?You can't show any economy that is capitalist. Capitalism is Third World. All First World economies are Socialist and have Mixed Market economies, to Prove it.I am amazed that people living in America openly support the failed idiology of socialism.
For socialism to work, human nature must be suppressed. That is impossible.
We have clear examples all the way back to Plymoth and William Bradford.
Humans are :
The naive socialist believes government can suppress that nature.
- Lazy
- Envious
- Vain
- Greedy
- Jealous
- Spiteful
- Fearful
- Hateful
- Etc
The capitalist harnesses that nature and puts it to use.
Socialism will always fail because it sucks and is stupid.
The OP needs to get the fuck out and go live where socialism works (wherever that is).
The right wing simply has no clue of economics.
There is no such thing as an unregulated nation, even if some of that regulation is deleterious to much of the population.
Only the right wing, never gets it.
Definition of Capitalism
Because people often use the term "Capitalism" loosely, "Laissez Faire Capitalism" is sometimes used to describe a true Capitalist system. But this phrase is redundant.
It is important to define "Capitalism" correctly because a proper definition is a prerequisite to a proper defense. Capitalism is the only moral political system because it is the only system dedicated to the protection of rights, which is a requirement for human survival and flourishing. This is the only proper role of a government. Capitalism should be defended vigorously on a moral basis, not an economic or utilitarian basis.
Bad response.it is our drug war. why are we Losing money on that public policy and not Making money.Example:Manna from the public sector whenever we cannot muster enough morals for any God?Most Leftists are atheists.The right simply doesn't care, about even Ten simple non-legislated Commandments, from a God. How, immoral is that.You can not legislate morals never can, never will... That's why socialism only works on paper not in the real world .
.
Protest the Drug Lords forcing people to run to thr US.
Don’t protest the US.
Good capitalists, generate revenue at every opportunity.
The right simply doesn't care, about even Ten simple non-legislated Commandments, from a God. How, immoral is that.The right wing complains about socialism. They Are the Problem, not socialism. Socialism merely requires social morals for free not capital morals for a market friendly price.What’s your argument?You have no argument, only ad hominems. Thanks for playing.
Republicans are evil!
Democrats need the poor.
Extremes will always exists and will always need to be tempered.
You can not legislate morals never can, never will... That's why socialism only works on paper not in the real world .
.
Most Leftists are atheists.
you have no facts, only fantasy./----/ You're just repeating Prog talking points. Try backing up your claims with some facts like I did.Capitalism doesn't care about rights, only capital. We know better, in modern times./----/ It's the complete opposite, Commie.under True Capitalism, capital matters not morals or morality.You mean nations where Drug Lords take charge?You can't show any economy that is capitalist. Capitalism is Third World. All First World economies are Socialist and have Mixed Market economies, to Prove it.
The right wing simply has no clue of economics.
There is no such thing as an unregulated nation, even if some of that regulation is deleterious to much of the population.
Only the right wing, never gets it.
Definition of Capitalism
Because people often use the term "Capitalism" loosely, "Laissez Faire Capitalism" is sometimes used to describe a true Capitalist system. But this phrase is redundant.
It is important to define "Capitalism" correctly because a proper definition is a prerequisite to a proper defense. Capitalism is the only moral political system because it is the only system dedicated to the protection of rights, which is a requirement for human survival and flourishing. This is the only proper role of a government. Capitalism should be defended vigorously on a moral basis, not an economic or utilitarian basis.
socialism on a national basis? I thought you allege to subscribe to Capitalism.Bad response.it is our drug war. why are we Losing money on that public policy and not Making money.Example:Manna from the public sector whenever we cannot muster enough morals for any God?Most Leftists are atheists.The right simply doesn't care, about even Ten simple non-legislated Commandments, from a God. How, immoral is that.
Protest the Drug Lords forcing people to run to thr US.
Don’t protest the US.
Good capitalists, generate revenue at every opportunity.
If they want help, demand military action, not flooding our borders with more welfare recipients and cheap baby sitters.
/----/ "Capital doesn't care for free." Really? I see it everywhere. Try getting out more.you have no facts, only fantasy./----/ You're just repeating Prog talking points. Try backing up your claims with some facts like I did.Capitalism doesn't care about rights, only capital. We know better, in modern times./----/ It's the complete opposite, Commie.under True Capitalism, capital matters not morals or morality.You mean nations where Drug Lords take charge?
There is no such thing as an unregulated nation, even if some of that regulation is deleterious to much of the population.
Only the right wing, never gets it.
Definition of Capitalism
Because people often use the term "Capitalism" loosely, "Laissez Faire Capitalism" is sometimes used to describe a true Capitalist system. But this phrase is redundant.
It is important to define "Capitalism" correctly because a proper definition is a prerequisite to a proper defense. Capitalism is the only moral political system because it is the only system dedicated to the protection of rights, which is a requirement for human survival and flourishing. This is the only proper role of a government. Capitalism should be defended vigorously on a moral basis, not an economic or utilitarian basis.
Capital doesn't care for free.
/----/ Where?True Capitalism is nowhere to be found, except the third world.
Government is socialism, and proves its worth, every day.
that is not caring; it is called a "loss leader", not a "caring leader"./----/ "Capital doesn't care for free." Really? I see it everywhere. Try getting out more.you have no facts, only fantasy./----/ You're just repeating Prog talking points. Try backing up your claims with some facts like I did.Capitalism doesn't care about rights, only capital. We know better, in modern times./----/ It's the complete opposite, Commie.under True Capitalism, capital matters not morals or morality.
Only the right wing, never gets it.
Definition of Capitalism
Because people often use the term "Capitalism" loosely, "Laissez Faire Capitalism" is sometimes used to describe a true Capitalist system. But this phrase is redundant.
It is important to define "Capitalism" correctly because a proper definition is a prerequisite to a proper defense. Capitalism is the only moral political system because it is the only system dedicated to the protection of rights, which is a requirement for human survival and flourishing. This is the only proper role of a government. Capitalism should be defended vigorously on a moral basis, not an economic or utilitarian basis.
Capital doesn't care for free.
View attachment 205203View attachment 205204View attachment 205205
lol. Can't see the government forest for all of the government trees?/----/ Where?True Capitalism is nowhere to be found, except the third world.
Government is socialism, and proves its worth, every day.
/---/ Oh so now when called out, you move the goalposts. Is English your second language? Your posts don't make much sense and I don't think you understand our responses.that is not caring; it is called a "loss leader", not a "caring leader"./----/ "Capital doesn't care for free." Really? I see it everywhere. Try getting out more.you have no facts, only fantasy./----/ You're just repeating Prog talking points. Try backing up your claims with some facts like I did.Capitalism doesn't care about rights, only capital. We know better, in modern times./----/ It's the complete opposite, Commie.
Definition of Capitalism
Because people often use the term "Capitalism" loosely, "Laissez Faire Capitalism" is sometimes used to describe a true Capitalist system. But this phrase is redundant.
It is important to define "Capitalism" correctly because a proper definition is a prerequisite to a proper defense. Capitalism is the only moral political system because it is the only system dedicated to the protection of rights, which is a requirement for human survival and flourishing. This is the only proper role of a government. Capitalism should be defended vigorously on a moral basis, not an economic or utilitarian basis.
Capital doesn't care for free.
View attachment 205203View attachment 205204View attachment 205205
/-----/ ever notice...that is not caring; it is called a "loss leader", not a "caring leader"./----/ "Capital doesn't care for free." Really? I see it everywhere. Try getting out more.you have no facts, only fantasy./----/ You're just repeating Prog talking points. Try backing up your claims with some facts like I did.Capitalism doesn't care about rights, only capital. We know better, in modern times./----/ It's the complete opposite, Commie.
Definition of Capitalism
Because people often use the term "Capitalism" loosely, "Laissez Faire Capitalism" is sometimes used to describe a true Capitalist system. But this phrase is redundant.
It is important to define "Capitalism" correctly because a proper definition is a prerequisite to a proper defense. Capitalism is the only moral political system because it is the only system dedicated to the protection of rights, which is a requirement for human survival and flourishing. This is the only proper role of a government. Capitalism should be defended vigorously on a moral basis, not an economic or utilitarian basis.
Capital doesn't care for free.
View attachment 205203View attachment 205204View attachment 205205
making up definitions as we go along?/---/ Oh so now when called out, you move the goalposts. Is English your second language? Your posts don't make much sense and I don't think you understand our responses.that is not caring; it is called a "loss leader", not a "caring leader"./----/ "Capital doesn't care for free." Really? I see it everywhere. Try getting out more.you have no facts, only fantasy./----/ You're just repeating Prog talking points. Try backing up your claims with some facts like I did.Capitalism doesn't care about rights, only capital. We know better, in modern times.
Capital doesn't care for free.
View attachment 205203View attachment 205204View attachment 205205
We have a Statue of Liberty./-----/ ever notice...that is not caring; it is called a "loss leader", not a "caring leader"./----/ "Capital doesn't care for free." Really? I see it everywhere. Try getting out more.you have no facts, only fantasy./----/ You're just repeating Prog talking points. Try backing up your claims with some facts like I did.Capitalism doesn't care about rights, only capital. We know better, in modern times.
Capital doesn't care for free.
View attachment 205203View attachment 205204View attachment 205205
Capitalism’s greatest inherent flaw is that as decades pass, widening income disparity will inevitably get worse. The rich become richer, and the poor become more poor. The middle class shrinks. The only way to prevent this is with government intervention, i.e. socialism. Capitalism of course isn’t a failure - the US would not be the juggernaut it is now if it weren’t for a private market. However, that does not mean the quality of life for most won’t get worse over time.
Socialism is a very broad term. To simplify the definition, it is a concept that involves the people funding (tax revenue) and owning (utilizing) government services. This is why every nation on earth - including the US - has a socialist backbone. Any service the government provides that’s funded by tax revenue and is utilized by the people is socialism.
The definition of socialism has nothing to do with corrupt leadership in a given government. Venezuela is failing because of the country’s leadership. Socialism’s core definition has nothing to do with a dictatorship government.
Nordic countries are social democratic countries. This means more services apply the the well being of the population. These people have the best quality of life according to international polling. That is something that is diminishing in America. However, that doesn’t mean the concept is the antithesis of capitalism. Socialism can be the framework of a capitalist system. Socialism is just needed to make sure a capitalistic system provides benefit to the well being of the population as a whole.
WTF are you babbling about?socialism on a national basis? I thought you allege to subscribe to Capitalism.Bad response.it is our drug war. why are we Losing money on that public policy and not Making money.Example:Manna from the public sector whenever we cannot muster enough morals for any God?Most Leftists are atheists.
Protest the Drug Lords forcing people to run to thr US.
Don’t protest the US.
Good capitalists, generate revenue at every opportunity.
If they want help, demand military action, not flooding our borders with more welfare recipients and cheap baby sitters.
Translation: taking less money from some at gunpoint to give to others.tax cuts for the Rich and cuts to social services for the poor?
