haissem123
Active Member
- Jul 28, 2014
- 950
- 46
- 33
because with mother nature presently pissed off at us. throwing storms and rumblings around as punishment. with nuclear not truly extinguished with the waves, floods or quakes that kill their vunerable pumps we can't keep the fires we start out or even quickly contain it. Not to mention it economically unsound with burial and security or lack there of cost of waster disposal. you got nuts buying left over crap to make bombs either dirty or clean as a 400 mega ton mini bomb we make. Till we grow up as a species, playing with firecrackers like these old plants full of dangerous unprotected shit, nukes are all wrong. Grow up yourself by all means go fukoshimo yourselfs, but count me out.you aren't seriously suggesting more nuclear are you?Sure it does. Sounds like the best plan for the Middle East, not us. Germany will be mostly solar by then and we will be way behind.If we stick with oil the middle east will get out money eventually, don't be silly. Or do you think it will be cheap forever? How about all the environmental damage everytime there is a spill? Look what happened in the gulf. We need to keep moving toward solar and wind.
The environment recovers, and even if we have to buy it all from the Middle East, we'll still be better off than we will with so-called "green energy." It would be impossible to make enough bio-diesel to run the world economy. There is simply no way you can have a power grid running on 100% solar and wind. You always have to have 100% backup from coal or natural gas fueled power plants.
The best thing to do is use our fossil fuels for the next 50 years or so by which time we should have cost effective fusion power.
Germany will be mostly solar by then and we will be way behind.
Way behind on wasteful boondogles?
Excellent news!
Now if the Greenies wanted to throw their support behind nuclear energy, I'd be more likely to believe
their fear of CO2 was sincere, instead of just a plan to get more government control over our economy.
You mean a reliable, large scale source of power that emits no CO2?
Why not?