Capitalism/Neo-Conservativism/Neo-Liberalism vs. Socialism or Democratic Socialism

[Mortimer]

Do you think Democratic Socialism will always fail and Capitalism is always better or you think there is a inbetween position. I think positive of democratic socialism is welfare for the broad masses. There really arent any homeless in Austria like in America, there arent people who need to beg for donations to get a life important surgery etc. But the negative thing is the mass immigration which is huge cost, but I think in a small homogenous country it can work, where also the citizens are law abiding and disciplined and hard working but if there are many who have mentality they dont want to work but to leech it can get difficult. Also I think capitalism is based on one owns gaining of profit and aggravation of capital, but you cant eat capital, and there needs to be a limit, there needs to be other values driving our societies except ones own profit. so there needs to be some regulations in my opinion. Otherwise I support right to private property etc. and right to start and run a business etc . but with some regulations. Im not communist, Im democratic socialist.

 

[Pete7469]

Then take your dumbass to Austria.

 

[Mortimer]

Then take your dumbass to Austria.

Im in Austria dude. In a small town in Upper Austria. Thats why I know how it is here.

 

[Moonglow]

Humans have worked collectively for many thousands of years, and capitalism can't stop that..

 

[TheOldSchool]

Then take your dumbass to Austria.

Im in Austria dude. In a small town in Upper Austria. Thats why I know how it is here.

Uh oh Pete you just spoke to a foreigner. Careful or Trump will put you on the list.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Then take your dumbass to Austria.

"Then take your dumbass to Austria."

Better he go home to Serbia, also they are not in the EU.

 

[The Great Goose]

Trump is a democratic socialist so it aint failing.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Do you think idiocy will always fail and Capitalism is always better or you think there is a inbetween position. I think positive of idiocy is welfare for the broad masses. There really arent any homeless in Austria like in America, there arent people who need to beg for donations to get a life important surgery etc. But the negative thing is the mass immigration which is huge cost, but I think in a small homogenous country it can work, where also the citizens are law abiding and disciplined and hard working but if there are many who have mentality they dont want to work but to leech it can get difficult. Also I think capitalism is based on one owns gaining of profit and aggravation of capital, but you cant eat capital, and there needs to be a limit, there needs to be other values driving our societies except ones own profit. so there needs to be some regulations in my opinion. Otherwise I support right to private property etc. and right to start and run a business etc . but with some regulations. Im not communist, Im an idiot.

Of course Socialism will fail, always has failed, and always will fail. The core components that make it Socialism are the main reasons that CAUSE it to fail. There's no incentive to work, the government either accumulates massive debt, or there are massive taxes, or both, and the collective is made generally poorer. It's not the equal sharing of wealth, it's the equal sharing of misery, because everyone is prevented from succeeding. I have a massive list of nations stupid enough to try Socialism, and have failed. Even the Nordics are making small advances towards capitalism.

Your title also shows you don't know what Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, and Capitalism are. Which makes sense, given your OP.

 

[Mortimer]

Do you think idiocy will always fail and Capitalism is always better or you think there is a inbetween position. I think positive of idiocy is welfare for the broad masses. There really arent any homeless in Austria like in America, there arent people who need to beg for donations to get a life important surgery etc. But the negative thing is the mass immigration which is huge cost, but I think in a small homogenous country it can work, where also the citizens are law abiding and disciplined and hard working but if there are many who have mentality they dont want to work but to leech it can get difficult. Also I think capitalism is based on one owns gaining of profit and aggravation of capital, but you cant eat capital, and there needs to be a limit, there needs to be other values driving our societies except ones own profit. so there needs to be some regulations in my opinion. Otherwise I support right to private property etc. and right to start and run a business etc . but with some regulations. Im not communist, Im an idiot.

Of course Socialism will fail, always has failed, and always will fail. The core components that make it Socialism are the main reasons that CAUSE it to fail. There's no incentive to work, the government either accumulates massive debt, or there are massive taxes, or both, and the collective is made generally poorer. It's not the equal sharing of wealth, it's the equal sharing of misery, because everyone is prevented from succeeding. I have a massive list of nations stupid enough to try Socialism, and have failed. Even the Nordics are making small advances towards capitalism.

Your title also shows you don't know what Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, and Capitalism are. Which makes sense, given your OP.

I dont know, maybe something third (neither socialism nor capitalism). But even Neo-Liberals admitt capitalism has limits. Even the IMF Thinks Neoliberalism Has Failed

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Do you think idiocy will always fail and Capitalism is always better or you think there is a inbetween position. I think positive of idiocy is welfare for the broad masses. There really arent any homeless in Austria like in America, there arent people who need to beg for donations to get a life important surgery etc. But the negative thing is the mass immigration which is huge cost, but I think in a small homogenous country it can work, where also the citizens are law abiding and disciplined and hard working but if there are many who have mentality they dont want to work but to leech it can get difficult. Also I think capitalism is based on one owns gaining of profit and aggravation of capital, but you cant eat capital, and there needs to be a limit, there needs to be other values driving our societies except ones own profit. so there needs to be some regulations in my opinion. Otherwise I support right to private property etc. and right to start and run a business etc . but with some regulations. Im not communist, Im an idiot.

Of course Socialism will fail, always has failed, and always will fail. The core components that make it Socialism are the main reasons that CAUSE it to fail. There's no incentive to work, the government either accumulates massive debt, or there are massive taxes, or both, and the collective is made generally poorer. It's not the equal sharing of wealth, it's the equal sharing of misery, because everyone is prevented from succeeding. I have a massive list of nations stupid enough to try Socialism, and have failed. Even the Nordics are making small advances towards capitalism.

Your title also shows you don't know what Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, and Capitalism are. Which makes sense, given your OP.

I dont know, maybe something third (neither socialism nor capitalism). But even Neo-Liberals admitt capitalism has limits. Even the IMF Thinks Neoliberalism Has Failed

Anything that uses any kind of Socialist ideology will never work. If anyone claims that Capitalism has limits, they have lost all credibility.

 

[007]

Do you think Democratic Socialism will always fail and Capitalism is always better or you think there is a inbetween position. I think positive of democratic socialism is welfare for the broad masses. There really arent any homeless in Austria like in America, there arent people who need to beg for donations to get a life important surgery etc. But the negative thing is the mass immigration which is huge cost, but I think in a small homogenous country it can work, where also the citizens are law abiding and disciplined and hard working but if there are many who have mentality they dont want to work but to leech it can get difficult. Also I think capitalism is based on one owns gaining of profit and aggravation of capital, but you cant eat capital, and there needs to be a limit, there needs to be other values driving our societies except ones own profit. so there needs to be some regulations in my opinion. Otherwise I support right to private property etc. and right to start and run a business etc . but with some regulations. Im not communist, Im democratic socialist.

If you had a classroom in school full of kids and you gave them all a test, and when the test results were announced that those who studied and got an A, their grade was going to be reduced to a C, and that portion of their grade was going to be given to the idiots and freeloaders that didn't study and got an F to bring their flunking grade up to a C also, how do you think that would effect the class going forward?

Now THINK about that...

 

[007]

Trump is a democratic socialist so it aint failing.

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT... a BILLIONAIRE is a SOCIALIST...

 

[The Great Goose]

Do you think idiocy will always fail and Capitalism is always better or you think there is a inbetween position. I think positive of idiocy is welfare for the broad masses. There really arent any homeless in Austria like in America, there arent people who need to beg for donations to get a life important surgery etc. But the negative thing is the mass immigration which is huge cost, but I think in a small homogenous country it can work, where also the citizens are law abiding and disciplined and hard working but if there are many who have mentality they dont want to work but to leech it can get difficult. Also I think capitalism is based on one owns gaining of profit and aggravation of capital, but you cant eat capital, and there needs to be a limit, there needs to be other values driving our societies except ones own profit. so there needs to be some regulations in my opinion. Otherwise I support right to private property etc. and right to start and run a business etc . but with some regulations. Im not communist, Im an idiot.

Of course Socialism will fail, always has failed, and always will fail. The core components that make it Socialism are the main reasons that CAUSE it to fail. There's no incentive to work, the government either accumulates massive debt, or there are massive taxes, or both, and the collective is made generally poorer. It's not the equal sharing of wealth, it's the equal sharing of misery, because everyone is prevented from succeeding. I have a massive list of nations stupid enough to try Socialism, and have failed. Even the Nordics are making small advances towards capitalism.

Your title also shows you don't know what Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, and Capitalism are. Which makes sense, given your OP.

I dont know, maybe something third (neither socialism nor capitalism). But even Neo-Liberals admitt capitalism has limits. Even the IMF Thinks Neoliberalism Has Failed

Anything that uses any kind of Socialist ideology will never work. If anyone claims that Capitalism has limits, they have lost all credibility.

Social security is just part of the economy now. You remind me of the old guard white nationalists. Same capitalism fetish.

 

[Dr Grump]

Anything that uses any kind of Socialist ideology will never work. If anyone claims that Capitalism has limits, they have lost all credibility.

Of course it has limits. Europe, NZ and Australia all have socialist aspects in their systems. Piss all over the US system.

 

[The Great Goose]

Trump is a democratic socialist so it aint failing.

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT... a BILLIONAIRE is a SOCIALIST...

Mao tse tung was filthy rich. So were all the top russian socialists.

 

[007]

Trump is a democratic socialist so it aint failing.

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT... a BILLIONAIRE is a SOCIALIST...

Mao tse tung was filthy rich. So were all the top russian socialists.

Because they STOLE from the people. The Russian billionaires did the same.

 

[The Great Goose]

Trump is a democratic socialist so it aint failing.

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT... a BILLIONAIRE is a SOCIALIST...

Mao tse tung was filthy rich. So were all the top russian socialists.

Because they STOLE from the people. The Russian billionaires did the same.

That's all Trump's father did. Getting ahead entails getting the better end of a deal instead of a fair exchange.

 

[007]

Trump is a democratic socialist so it aint failing.

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT... a BILLIONAIRE is a SOCIALIST...

Mao tse tung was filthy rich. So were all the top russian socialists.

Because they STOLE from the people. The Russian billionaires did the same.

That's all Trump's father did. Getting ahead entails getting the better end of a deal instead of a fair exchange.

Oh bull shit.

Trump inherited around $400M and turned it into $10B. He's pure capitalist to the core, and so was his dad.

 

[The Great Goose]

Trump is a democratic socialist so it aint failing.

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT... a BILLIONAIRE is a SOCIALIST...

Mao tse tung was filthy rich. So were all the top russian socialists.

Because they STOLE from the people. The Russian billionaires did the same.

That's all Trump's father did. Getting ahead entails getting the better end of a deal instead of a fair exchange.

Oh bull shit.

Trump inherited around $400M and turned it into $10B. He's pure capitalist to the core, and so was his dad.

He understands that welfare is part of the economy. He may not need it himself but I think you'll find he's a social democrat.

 

[007]

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT... a BILLIONAIRE is a SOCIALIST...

Mao tse tung was filthy rich. So were all the top russian socialists.

Because they STOLE from the people. The Russian billionaires did the same.

That's all Trump's father did. Getting ahead entails getting the better end of a deal instead of a fair exchange.

Oh bull shit.

Trump inherited around $400M and turned it into $10B. He's pure capitalist to the core, and so was his dad.

He understands that welfare is part of the economy. He may not need it himself but I think you'll find he's a social democrat.

Whether he's a social democrat or not, which is debatable, is irrelevant. He's still a 100% capitalist, which was the point.