ChrisL
Diamond Member
The question, without considering such factors, is just not a "rational" question to begin with, so it should not have been asked in such a way.
Say what? The substance of that remark is "the question is not rational; therefore it should not be asked irrationally." Surely you don't mean that the way you wrote it?
If you truly do, please spend a good deal of time here: Logically Fallacious
What is it going to take for you to understand that a hypothetical question/scenario need not at all present real, plausible, possible, or probable situations? You know, whatever it is, you don't need to share with me. I'm done trying to explain it for I'm now weary of the intellectual intransigence you're showing in this discussion.
TY for the chit chat.
If a person is expecting "rational" and "logical" responses, then there wouldn't be a need to put those kinds of limitations because that is not using logic or rationale.