Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He is a loose cannon. He can make some pretty inflammatory statements and stir the pot. Not seeing how that translates to a good President.
Just watch this fucking retard, the motherfucking piece of shit thinks there are 57 states... Lol
He is a loose cannon. He can make some pretty inflammatory statements and stir the pot. Not seeing how that translates to a good President.
I don't know that he will be a "good president"
but I do know that Hillary would be abysmal
Again, with Trump, we have maybe a chance, we have none with Ms Rodham
IF he honors his promise on the SCOTUS list he made public, it will have been worth voting for him
They're both awful candidates but only one of them is rational.He is a loose cannon. He can make some pretty inflammatory statements and stir the pot. Not seeing how that translates to a good President.
I don't know that he will be a "good president"
but I do know that Hillary would be abysmal
Again, with Trump, we have maybe a chance, we have none with Ms Rodham
IF he honors his promise on the SCOTUS list he made public, it will have been worth voting for him
"IF" he honors. That's a big if. That is my issue with him. I can't trust him. But I understand your point.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
They're both awful candidates but only one of them is rational.He is a loose cannon. He can make some pretty inflammatory statements and stir the pot. Not seeing how that translates to a good President.
I don't know that he will be a "good president"
but I do know that Hillary would be abysmal
Again, with Trump, we have maybe a chance, we have none with Ms Rodham
IF he honors his promise on the SCOTUS list he made public, it will have been worth voting for him
"IF" he honors. That's a big if. That is my issue with him. I can't trust him. But I understand your point.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
You might think she's corrupt but at least there's thought behind her corruption.
You told me voting for someone not electable is stupid, and if I vote for Trump I contradict myself. If I vote for Hillary I contradict myself. You are just a nutjob. Don't worry, I'll stay away from an R or a D for President. I don't like either enough to vote for them.
You spend a lot of time for not caring. lol!
Was Bill Clinton known known?
I think yes.
He had a history as Governor of Arkansas; his reputation was one of a "conservative democrat"; which he wound up being if we want to be honest (yes, those on my side can justifiably say that he veered to the right after repubs took the House, but at the end of the day, he was no "leftist")
And you think the other Clinton will be totally different, right?
Well I don't think so, never seen those two disagree on a policy.
You told me voting for someone not electable is stupid, and if I vote for Trump I contradict myself. If I vote for Hillary I contradict myself. You are just a nutjob. Don't worry, I'll stay away from an R or a D for President. I don't like either enough to vote for them.
You spend a lot of time for not caring. lol!
LOL, nutjob? Just because I'm trying to ground your rhetoric to actual vote decision? You doth protest too much.
And yes, you will contradict your prior statements if you vote for either, that's not my fault for pointing out. Nor is it my fault that Johnson is not actually a viable candidate.
Was Bill Clinton known known?
I think yes.
He had a history as Governor of Arkansas; his reputation was one of a "conservative democrat"; which he wound up being if we want to be honest (yes, those on my side can justifiably say that he veered to the right after repubs took the House, but at the end of the day, he was no "leftist")
And you think the other Clinton will be totally different, right?
Well I don't think so, never seen those two disagree on a policy.
Every reputable scientist in the world is wrong, and Trump is right. Course, he also said he knows more than the generals.So we are number one in the world in pseudoscientists?The other 94% are pseudoscientists...Only 6% of scientists are Republican. What does that tell you?
That's probably true. We certainly have the market cornered on climate con artists.
[
Climate "Scientists" don't seem to do any actual science, they're paid to pat each other on the back and say "Consensus"
^ How not to do science
There are two, both are Republican/libertarian. You expected me to read your mind? Really? Are you a chick? Really
Can't trust anyone with learnin'.Every reputable scientist in the world is wrong, and Trump is right. Course, he also said he knows more than the generals.So we are number one in the world in pseudoscientists?The other 94% are pseudoscientists...Only 6% of scientists are Republican. What does that tell you?
That's probably true. We certainly have the market cornered on climate con artists.
Trump is far from the only person who is skeptical of the AGW con, and your definition of "reputable" means they support the AGW con.
Executive Experience? You mean her disastrous record as Secretary of State? You mean selling her office for cash?
You said Trump is infinitely worse, you have not proved it. I see them as about the same except I think Trump is more honest and trustworthy than Hillary. So really you have helped me to push the scales in favor of Trump, yet I won't vote for either.
Can't trust anyone with learnin'.Every reputable scientist in the world is wrong, and Trump is right. Course, he also said he knows more than the generals.So we are number one in the world in pseudoscientists?The other 94% are pseudoscientists...
That's probably true. We certainly have the market cornered on climate con artists.
Trump is far from the only person who is skeptical of the AGW con, and your definition of "reputable" means they support the AGW con.
There are two, both are Republican/libertarian. You expected me to read your mind? Really? Are you a chick? Really
Hey, you're the guy always rabbiting on how smart you are...
Exactly!Can't trust anyone with learnin'.Every reputable scientist in the world is wrong, and Trump is right. Course, he also said he knows more than the generals.So we are number one in the world in pseudoscientists?
That's probably true. We certainly have the market cornered on climate con artists.
Trump is far from the only person who is skeptical of the AGW con, and your definition of "reputable" means they support the AGW con.
You can't trust so-called "scientists" who get a check from the government to produce results that justify government. They are nothing more than con artists and propagandists.
You said Trump is infinitely worse, you have not proved it. I see them as about the same except I think Trump is more honest and trustworthy than Hillary. So really you have helped me to push the scales in favor of Trump, yet I won't vote for either.
You're right, I haven't. He has. Listen to any of his speeches. He has no idea what he is talking about. He is totally dishonest. Don't believe me? Have a gander at this little beauty.
You seem to think I like Hillary. I don't particularly. She's just so much better than him. And that's kinda scary.
