Can The Democrats Win In 2020 Without A Candidate of Color?

[Crepitus]

The Southern Strategy is now fully complete. The Republicans have fully morphed into the party of old white racists. The Dems messed up and nominated a charismatic Black man who went on to win the presidency. The bar was set extremely high with Obamas election. Who can the Democrats nominate that can lead like Obama did? Can it be a white person? I don't think so. Thoughts?

Honestly, I think by the time it comes around the republicans will be in such a hole that we could nominate a muppet with bad hair and no discernable platform and still win.

 

[Google_Yourself]

The only qualified ones are white.

Looks like the OP was right. Come to think of it, i was right as well.
REPUBLICANS ARE RACIST.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, they're so racist that they freed the slaves from the Democrats.

Since that did not happen, try again.

Sounds like you've never read a history book.

 

[flacaltenn]

The Southern Strategy is now fully complete. The Republicans have fully morphed into the party of old white racists. The Dems messed up and nominated a charismatic Black man who went on to win the presidency. The bar was set extremely high with Obamas election. Who can the Democrats nominate that can lead like Obama did? Can it be a white person? I don't think so. Thoughts?

Amazingly, if that's your MAJOR concern, --- there's a problem with your allegiance to a party that can't see past skin color..

 

[Google_Yourself]

The Southern Strategy is now fully complete. The Republicans have fully morphed into the party of old white racists. The Dems messed up and nominated a charismatic Black man who went on to win the presidency. The bar was set extremely high with Obamas election. Who can the Democrats nominate that can lead like Obama did? Can it be a white person? I don't think so. Thoughts?

After Obama, I don't think there will be any more candidate of color.
America isn't going to make that mistake again.

The disaster that was shitstain obama poisoned the well for another black president for a hundred years or more.

Have you noticed that with all the extolling everyone does about how wonderful the shitstain is, no one mentions his accomplishments .

Yet despite all the corrupt ad cooked ass whites that have been president the well is never poisoned for whites.

His accomplishments were destroying America.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

obama's accomplishments are according to obama. They are failures like the Trans Pacific partnership and obamacare. All of which have been mercifully terminated by the righteousness power of a real leader, President Trump.

 

[Nosmo King]

The question will be answered by the nominee not the race or gender of the nomonee

 

[JustAnotherNut]

Seems like the most important qualification for the OP is the color of the person's skin!

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

Seems like the most important qualification for the OP is the color of the person's skin!

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

Considering that in the 200+ year history of this country, blacks have only been lawfully allowed to vote in every state for 55 years, that is obvious.

Furthermore, there has never been a president of Asian, Native American or Hispanic decent.

So can either of you come up with how many non-whites have ever ran for President, that actually had a solid plan on the issues of this country??????? Instead of complaining why they haven't won?

 

[Asclepias]

Seems like the most important qualification for the OP is the color of the person's skin!

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

Seems like the most important qualification for the OP is the color of the person's skin!

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

Considering that in the 200+ year history of this country, blacks have only been lawfully allowed to vote in every state for 55 years, that is obvious.

Furthermore, there has never been a president of Asian, Native American or Hispanic decent.

So can either of you come up with how many non-whites have ever ran for President, that actually had a solid plan on the issues of this country??????? Instead of complaining why they haven't won?

Solid plan according to whom?

 

[Asclepias]

The Southern Strategy is now fully complete. The Republicans have fully morphed into the party of old white racists. The Dems messed up and nominated a charismatic Black man who went on to win the presidency. The bar was set extremely high with Obamas election. Who can the Democrats nominate that can lead like Obama did? Can it be a white person? I don't think so. Thoughts?

Amazingly, if that's your MAJOR concern, --- there's a problem with your allegiance to a party that can't see past skin color..

Yeah I know the repub party cant see past skin color. The reason why your comment is wrong is that I've never voted repub in my life. You have me mixed up with the milkman.

 

[flacaltenn]

The Southern Strategy is now fully complete. The Republicans have fully morphed into the party of old white racists. The Dems messed up and nominated a charismatic Black man who went on to win the presidency. The bar was set extremely high with Obamas election. Who can the Democrats nominate that can lead like Obama did? Can it be a white person? I don't think so. Thoughts?

Amazingly, if that's your MAJOR concern, --- there's a problem with your allegiance to a party that can't see past skin color..

I've never voted republican in my life. You have the wrong guy.

With only 2 choices, that's a very dangerous place to be.. And I would expect you to vote Republican, but certainly, the benefits of being a party animal are vastly limited.

If the Rs and Ds after peoples names were banned tomorrow, would you be completely LOST in who to vote for? Or is it STILL by primarily their skin color?

 

[IM2]

The only qualified ones are white.

Looks like the OP was right. Come to think of it, i was right as well.
REPUBLICANS ARE RACIST.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, they're so racist that they freed the slaves from the Democrats.

Since that did not happen, try again.

Sounds like you've never read a history book.

I've read more of them than you have. That's why I said what I did.

Republicans back then were racists.

And nobody in todays republican party had anything to do with emancipation.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

Seems like the most important qualification for the OP is the color of the person's skin!

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

Seems like the most important qualification for the OP is the color of the person's skin!

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

Considering that in the 200+ year history of this country, blacks have only been lawfully allowed to vote in every state for 55 years, that is obvious.

Furthermore, there has never been a president of Asian, Native American or Hispanic decent.

So can either of you come up with how many non-whites have ever ran for President, that actually had a solid plan on the issues of this country??????? Instead of complaining why they haven't won?

Solid plan according to whom?

ok skip the 'solid plan'...….can you come up with anyone??????

Well that 'solid plan', I was thinking Hillary......she didn't have one, she never came up with any details on how she was going to 'fix' the problems facing the country, even though she's not 'of color'

Also, Ben Carson (hey there's one for ya) was a lame candidate

 

[Asclepias]

The Southern Strategy is now fully complete. The Republicans have fully morphed into the party of old white racists. The Dems messed up and nominated a charismatic Black man who went on to win the presidency. The bar was set extremely high with Obamas election. Who can the Democrats nominate that can lead like Obama did? Can it be a white person? I don't think so. Thoughts?

Amazingly, if that's your MAJOR concern, --- there's a problem with your allegiance to a party that can't see past skin color..

I've never voted republican in my life. You have the wrong guy.

With only 2 choices, that's a very dangerous place to be.. And I would expect you to vote Republican, but certainly, the benefits of being a party animal are vastly limited.

If the Rs and Ds after peoples names were banned tomorrow, would you be completely LOST in who to vote for? Or is it STILL by primarily their skin color?

Theres always more than two choices. I'm an Independent. I'm never lost in who I vote for. I do know for a fact I would never vote for a candidate that reflects the beliefs and values of a repub.

 

[S.J.]

Why would the Dem Party, the party of racism, slavery, and the KKK want to nominate a person of color? They hate negroes. They had to run one, just to show they're not racist, but one is all they get and he got more support than they wanted to give him. He was the token negro, to quote Don (fairy) Lemon, and they won't have to humor them again for another 40 years when it'll be "their turn" again. It's their reward for being loyal plantation dwellers (slaves) who do what they're told.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

The only qualified ones are white.

Looks like the OP was right. Come to think of it, i was right as well.
REPUBLICANS ARE RACIST.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, they're so racist that they freed the slaves from the Democrats.

Since that did not happen, try again.

Sounds like you've never read a history book.

I've read more of them than you have. That's why I said what I did.

Republicans back then were racists.

And nobody in todays republican party had anything to do with emancipation.

Well duh...….how can anyone in todays party have anything to do with emancipation......d or r??

And back then......pretty much everyone was 'racist' because that was the way of life at that time...….


if you haven't heard......we've come along way baby

 

[IM2]

The Southern Strategy is now fully complete. The Republicans have fully morphed into the party of old white racists. The Dems messed up and nominated a charismatic Black man who went on to win the presidency. The bar was set extremely high with Obamas election. Who can the Democrats nominate that can lead like Obama did? Can it be a white person? I don't think so. Thoughts?

Amazingly, if that's your MAJOR concern, --- there's a problem with your allegiance to a party that can't see past skin color..

Like republicans see past skin color.

Are you crazy? Who the hell do you think you are talking to?

Many whites have adopted the colorblind claim of non-racism. There is one problem with this. This belief about colorblindness is a form of racism. Being white and not having to deal directly with racism, it is simple for whites to ignore or discount the impact of racism upon anyone. They can claim to be colorblind even as they practice racism because they don’t face it. One of the main problems with this coming from whites is this belief ignores some 400 years of American history. We could all go colorblind relative to race tomorrow, but the damage created by almost four centuries of abuses will still exist. Whites will be colorblind then continue not hiring blacks because blacks do not have work experience. Yet that lack of work experience would have been due to the racism that occurred before everybody turned colorblind. But now that we would have become colorblind we can ignore those years because we don’t see color and are only hiring based on merit.

 

[Asclepias]

Seems like the most important qualification for the OP is the color of the person's skin!

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

Seems like the most important qualification for the OP is the color of the person's skin!

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

Considering that in the 200+ year history of this country, blacks have only been lawfully allowed to vote in every state for 55 years, that is obvious.

Furthermore, there has never been a president of Asian, Native American or Hispanic decent.

So can either of you come up with how many non-whites have ever ran for President, that actually had a solid plan on the issues of this country??????? Instead of complaining why they haven't won?

Solid plan according to whom?

ok skip the 'solid plan'...….can you come up with anyone??????

Well that 'solid plan', I was thinking Hillary......she didn't have one, she never came up with any details on how she was going to 'fix' the problems facing the country, even though she's not 'of color'

Also, Ben Carson (hey there's one for ya) was a lame candidate

Frederick Douglass and Shirley Chisholm.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

Seems like the most important qualification for the OP is the color of the person's skin!

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

How many of our presidents have been non white? I think the problem is that to white people skin color is the most important qualification.

Considering that in the 200+ year history of this country, blacks have only been lawfully allowed to vote in every state for 55 years, that is obvious.

Furthermore, there has never been a president of Asian, Native American or Hispanic decent.

So can either of you come up with how many non-whites have ever ran for President, that actually had a solid plan on the issues of this country??????? Instead of complaining why they haven't won?

Solid plan according to whom?

ok skip the 'solid plan'...….can you come up with anyone??????

Well that 'solid plan', I was thinking Hillary......she didn't have one, she never came up with any details on how she was going to 'fix' the problems facing the country, even though she's not 'of color'

Also, Ben Carson (hey there's one for ya) was a lame candidate

Frederick Douglass and Shirley Chisholm.

Unfortunately Frederick Douglass doesn't count...…...namely because of society's stance on anyone of color at that time. Not to mention, most blacks were still slaves then and had no rights, including the right to vote.


Shirley Chisholm is/was to be admired for the work she had done...….but again timing is important here. She ran in 1972, when most women of any color were still fighting for our rights of equality

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The Democrat socialist winning team is Cory "Spartacus " Booker and Kamala "the business killer" Harris.

 

[flacaltenn]

The Southern Strategy is now fully complete. The Republicans have fully morphed into the party of old white racists. The Dems messed up and nominated a charismatic Black man who went on to win the presidency. The bar was set extremely high with Obamas election. Who can the Democrats nominate that can lead like Obama did? Can it be a white person? I don't think so. Thoughts?

Amazingly, if that's your MAJOR concern, --- there's a problem with your allegiance to a party that can't see past skin color..

I've never voted republican in my life. You have the wrong guy.

With only 2 choices, that's a very dangerous place to be.. And I would expect you to vote Republican, but certainly, the benefits of being a party animal are vastly limited.

If the Rs and Ds after peoples names were banned tomorrow, would you be completely LOST in who to vote for? Or is it STILL by primarily their skin color?

Theres always more than two choices. I'm an Independent. I'm never lost in who I vote for. I do know for a fact I would never vote for a candidate that reflects the beliefs and values of a repub.

So -- when the progressive left in California BANS EVERY OTHER POLITICAL choice from the ballot and runs just TWO democrats on their General Election ballot for Senator -- you're completely cool with that?

I repeat -- it's dangerous to allow primarily ONE PARTY to determine your choices. It's too late for Cali -- but this is where not promoting ballot choice leads.