Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
JFK was very strong on defense -as well as initiated pre-emptive operations in Vietnam, and was successful in across-the-board tax cuts that spurred a period of strong economic growth. JFK's supply-side initiative cut short the economic stagnation that was creeping in and ushered in a new era of economic pro-business prosperity.
LBJ then took the increased revenues and greatly expanded the role of government, utilizing the then-dead JFK "legacy" as the means of getting it done. With the cost of war, and the ever increasing size and scope of his "Great Society" government makeover, the increased revenues of created by the JFK tax cuts were soon gone - and the economic flatline that took place in the 1970s was soon to follow.
Watch this video of JFK and it becomes clear that the Democrat Party of then, bears very little resemblance to the Democrat Party of today. JFK was a supply-sider, a social issues moderate, and international hawk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEdXrfIMdiU
Sinatra check out this ad
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iddquwGpXM0[/ame]
A LOT of liberal people are mad at him for the ad, but you showed the clip in its entire context and now I know Senator Brown's ad was accurate.
Kennedy was able to cut income taxes within the realm of fiscal responsibility. When Republicans learn how to do that, then maybe they can lay claim to a tiny fraction of the Kennedy legacy.
JFK was very strong on defense -as well as initiated pre-emptive operations in Vietnam, and was successful in across-the-board tax cuts that spurred a period of strong economic growth. JFK's supply-side initiative cut short the economic stagnation that was creeping in and ushered in a new era of economic pro-business prosperity.
LBJ then took the increased revenues and greatly expanded the role of government, utilizing the then-dead JFK "legacy" as the means of getting it done. With the cost of war, and the ever increasing size and scope of his "Great Society" government makeover, the increased revenues of created by the JFK tax cuts were soon gone - and the economic flatline that took place in the 1970s was soon to follow.
Watch this video of JFK and it becomes clear that the Democrat Party of then, bears very little resemblance to the Democrat Party of today. JFK was a supply-sider, a social issues moderate, and international hawk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEdXrfIMdiU
Sinatra check out this ad
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iddquwGpXM0[/ame]
A LOT of liberal people are mad at him for the ad, but you showed the clip in its entire context and now I know Senator Brown's ad was accurate.
Kennedy was able to cut income taxes within the realm of fiscal responsibility. When Republicans learn how to do that, then maybe they can lay claim to a tiny fraction of the Kennedy legacy.
The Dems will rig that thing up there. That's just par for the course up there. Lets hope the people stand up to them and vote for Brown though. He really is the better candidate. Go get em Mr. Brown!
Sinatra check out this ad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iddquwGpXM0
A LOT of liberal people are mad at him for the ad, but you showed the clip in its entire context and now I know Senator Brown's ad was accurate.
Kennedy was able to cut income taxes within the realm of fiscal responsibility. When Republicans learn how to do that, then maybe they can lay claim to a tiny fraction of the Kennedy legacy.
You didn't watch the debates Brown and Coakley had did you?
Scott brown Specifically said "we cant cut taxes without cutting spending like Bush did or you end up with the problems we have today"
So your claim about him not knowing about fiscally responsible tax cuts is innacurate.
Fiscally further right - socially moderate. (which actually leans libertarian)
That is the recipe for Republican domination in the future if they follow the lead of figures such as Scott Brown.
Lower taxes, less government, increased state rights to self-determine policy - basically get government off the backs of the working men and women who keep everything going day in and day out...
Fiscally further right - socially moderate. (which actually leans libertarian)
That is the recipe for Republican domination in the future if they follow the lead of figures such as Scott Brown.
Lower taxes, less government, increased state rights to self-determine policy - basically get government off the backs of the working men and women who keep everything going day in and day out...
Your post made me think of this
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWVxI6XZAuE[/ame]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Royrg-_SEkw
Thought this was a good and I found out today that Scott Brown is a Lt. Col. in the Guard and has been for many years.
YOu guys haven't even found the real damaging thing about Martha Coakley yet.
Reasearch her a little, find out what she did in 2002 that made her popular. Then look at what she did with the same person in 1995.
She was part of the coverup of the pedophile priests....well mabye not intentionally but she helped.
Obviously he's the superior candidate but that doesn't mean he'll win up there. The Dems are firmly entrenched up there and will do anything to keep that seat...and i mean anything. Look for a lot of voter "irregularities" in that election. Seriously,who would vote for Coakley? She is an awful Democratic candidate. I guess we'll see though. I'm definitely rooting for Mr. Brown though.
