Can anyone explain how Trump's election conspiracy works?

So we are all agreed on the main point: Trump must produce concrete, incontrovertible evidence of some sort of criminal manipulation. If he can't then fuck him.

But on the other hand, there was a vast Media conspiracy to distort the political realities in the lead-up to this election, and thus discourage Trump voters from coming out. Thankfully, the campaign to discourage such votes was totally unsuccessful. Nevertheless the pundits and pollsters should be shot.

Trump disparaged Absentee ballots so Republicans did not vote absentee, Democrats did! See how that works?
 
Assuming you are serious, the story is as follows:

Mail-in voting is fraught with opportunities for fraud. Generic ballots (ballots with no unique identifier) are mailed out to every name and address that the voting machine can locate. This includes people who have died, people who have moved, people who have not voted in many, many years. Usually mail in ballots number much more than the voting population. And of course the political parties are ALSO sending out mail-in ballots to their constituents.

Contrast this with "Absentee Ballots," where an individual, registered voter formally requests a ballot from the election authorities because for one reason or another they will not be able to vote in person (working out of state, can't get off work, etc.). These ballots only go out to legally registered voters, and they are uniquely identified with that voter. Usually a witness and a signature are on the Absentee Ballot, so there is little room for fraud.

So what could happen with Mail-in Ballots? People could just fill them out and mail them in with the names of random other people. Political operatives can determine which voters rarely vote, and submit Mail-ins for those people. If it turns out to be a duplicate, who cares? The sender cannot be identified. The election authorities in most cases are told that irregular signatures are NOT a reason to disqualify a ballot, which makes it even easier to commit fraud.

So the question is, if there were some political party or organization that WANTED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE of the much-too-loose controls on Mail-in voting, would they be able to do that? The answer is manifestly, yes.

Then you look at precincts in large inner cities (e.g., Philadelphia) where 100% of the Mail-in ballots are straight-ticket Democrat votes, and unless you are either stupid or compromised yourself, you think, There's something fishy going on here. Black males are voting Republican nationally at a rate of 15-20%, and yet in Philadelphia it is ZERO PERCENT? What. The. Fuck?
Has anyone who spreads that propaganda ever heard of bar codes and computers?
 
So we are all agreed on the main point: Trump must produce concrete, incontrovertible evidence of some sort of criminal manipulation. If he can't then fuck him.

But on the other hand, there was a vast Media conspiracy to distort the political realities in the lead-up to this election, and thus discourage Trump voters from coming out. Thankfully, the campaign to discourage such votes was totally unsuccessful. Nevertheless the pundits and pollsters should be shot.
You spout the same incendiary, propagandistic rhetoric as do Trump's rabid neo-nazi supporters at Daily Stormer:

Screen_Shot_2016-12-18_at_12.55.57_PM.png
100% of Donald Trump supporters now know as a matter of fact that this system is an absolute sham. There is nothing that the media can do to change that understanding, because the media is part of the sham.
This was a massive mistake on the part of the ruling elite: they thought that they could win the election with their mail-in ballot hoax. Then, when they saw that it was going to fail, they openly engaged in mass fraud for the whole world to witness.
Under normal circumstances, when the fix failed, they would have let Trump win, rather than pull the mask off. This entire “democracy” swindle is based on faith in the system.
The faith is all dried up. Forever.
Also, your recommending that the pundits and pollsters you don't like be shot is comparable to the call by radical Trumper Bannon that the nation's respected Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Anthony Fauci, and the nation's FBI Director, Christopher Wray, should be executed in a manner befitting al Qaeda:

Stephen K. Bannon, the former adviser to President Trump who is known for his right-wing extremism, suggested on Thursday that the F.B.I. director and Dr. Anthony S. Fauci should be beheaded...
Please consider your alignment with pernicious elements and indicted felons (accused of swindling naïve Trumpsters by deluding them into pretending they are Mexico and paying for a wall) and temper your febrile effusions.

They are singularly unAmerican.
 
If I understand it correctly, state governments across the nation, led by both Republican and Democratic secretaries-of-state and other election officials, coordinated bogus vote counts in multiple states, and the hundreds of individuals, both Republican and Democrat, who counted the votes, as well as the hundreds of individuals, both Republican and Democrat, charged with verifying and confirming those totals, were all complicit in the air-tight deception in which not one of those thousands of public servants, both Republican and Democrat, leaked a hint concerning the vast deceit they had planned and brilliantly engineered.

After nearly four years of national polls, in both private and public surveys, had attested, consistently, to Trump's relentless unpopularity with most Americans, this legion of bumptious bamboozlers made it appear that more folks would vote against him than for him. Go figure!

Curiously, all those thousands of wily and incredibly-secretive naughty people, both Republican and Democrat, in compiling their fraudulent tallies, orchestrated an increase of Republican seats in the House, and Senate results that favored Republicans keeping control of McConnell's upper chamber pot.

For such a monumental, masterful caper, one would imagine that such hyper-partisan masterminds would not be so egregiously negligent.

View attachment 412506
"ME! It's all about ME!"

View attachment 412507
"Stop making sense! It's all about
TRUMP!"


Suspects?

View attachment 412516

Step 1: dems cheat
Step 2: Go to Step 1
 
Step 1: dems cheat
Step 2: Go to Step 1
Simple-minded prejudice does not get very far under America's system of jurisprudence where actual, credible evidence is required.

How, exactly, were so many of the diverse state elections subverted to favor House and Senate Republicans, and by whom?
 
I would not call democrat election fraud an organized conspiracy with secret meetings and notes written in disappearing ink

Rather, do ants “conspire” to build the ant colony?

or is that just what ants do?
 
Last edited:
I would not call democrat election fraud an organized conspiracy with secret meetings and notes written in disappearing ink

Rather, do ants “conspire” to build the ant colony?

or is that just what ants do?
Your noting the transparent nature of the disorganized conspiracy perpetrated by 74+ million American voters is unimpeachable.

It's just what they did.
 
Your noting the transparent nature of the disorganized conspiracy perpetrated by 74+ million American voters is unimpeachable.
I wonder how many of those alleged voters never saw the ballot that was filled out by some democrat rodent poll worker
 
Step 1: dems cheat
Step 2: Go to Step 1
Simple-minded prejudice does not get very far under America's system of jurisprudence where actual, credible evidence is required.

How, exactly, were so many of the diverse state elections subverted to favor House and Senate Republicans, and by whom?

Q. How, exactly, were so many of the diverse state elections subverted to favor House and Senate Republicans, and by whom?
  1. All of the ones where Biden only votes turned up in the dead of night
  2. democrats
Oh you white Liberals fucked over John James like pre-Ike sending in 82nd Airborne days
 
If I understand it correctly, state governments across the nation, led by both Republican and Democratic secretaries-of-state and other election officials, coordinated bogus vote counts in multiple states, and the hundreds of individuals, both Republican and Democrat, who counted the votes, as well as the hundreds of individuals, both Republican and Democrat, charged with verifying and confirming those totals, were all complicit in the air-tight deception in which not one of those thousands of public servants, both Republican and Democrat, leaked a hint concerning the vast deceit they had planned and brilliantly engineered.

After nearly four years of national polls, in both private and public surveys, had attested, consistently, to Trump's relentless unpopularity with most Americans, this legion of bumptious bamboozlers made it appear that more folks would vote against him than for him. Go figure!

Curiously, all those thousands of wily and incredibly-secretive naughty people, both Republican and Democrat, in compiling their fraudulent tallies, orchestrated an increase of Republican seats in the House, and Senate results that favored Republicans keeping control of McConnell's upper chamber pot.

For such a monumental, masterful caper, one would imagine that such hyper-partisan masterminds would not be so egregiously negligent.

View attachment 412506
"ME! It's all about ME!"

View attachment 412507
"Stop making sense! It's all about
TRUMP!"


Suspects?

View attachment 412516
And, after all that planning - they totally forgot about the Senate. Doh!
 
I wonder how many of those alleged voters never saw the ballot that was filled out by some democrat rodent poll worker
I suppose you could fantasize all 74 million+ if that makes you happy.

You might akso muse that delusional Trump's 3-5 million illegal voters who all cast bogus ballots against him in 2016 were out in force as well, if you wish to entirely dispense with actual evidence.


C_9N3O5V0AEO3Io_0.jpg

Just because he can't find even one shouldn't impact
your blind faith in my baseless ravings!
 
I suppose you could fantasize all 74 million+ if that makes you happy.
I have said since 1 year ago it will be a close election that could go either way

so most of the votes for biden were legit

but not all of them
 
If I understand it correctly, state governments across the nation, led by both Republican and Democratic secretaries-of-state and other election officials, coordinated bogus vote counts in multiple states, and the hundreds of individuals, both Republican and Democrat, who counted the votes, as well as the hundreds of individuals, both Republican and Democrat, charged with verifying and confirming those totals, were all complicit in the air-tight deception in which not one of those thousands of public servants, both Republican and Democrat, leaked a hint concerning the vast deceit they had planned and brilliantly engineered.

After nearly four years of national polls, in both private and public surveys, had attested, consistently, to Trump's relentless unpopularity with most Americans, this legion of bumptious bamboozlers made it appear that more folks would vote against him than for him. Go figure!

Curiously, all those thousands of wily and incredibly-secretive naughty people, both Republican and Democrat, in compiling their fraudulent tallies, orchestrated an increase of Republican seats in the House, and Senate results that favored Republicans keeping control of McConnell's upper chamber pot.

For such a monumental, masterful caper, one would imagine that such hyper-partisan masterminds would not be so egregiously negligent.

View attachment 412506
"ME! It's all about ME!"

View attachment 412507
"Stop making sense! It's all about
TRUMP!"


Suspects?

View attachment 412516
Simple...with or without secretary of state approval or knowledge--the dems cheated any way and any where that they could by various means----------

The dems have never had any morals----
 
... so most of the votes for biden were legit

but not all of them
Since you are dispensing with credible evidence, you can indulge in baseless speculation that the same applies equally to Trump.
 
Simple...with or without secretary of state approval or knowledge--the dems cheated any way and any where that they could by various means----------
Without resorting to actual evidence, it is every bit as probable that Trumpers did precisely the same, of course, but with less competence. They only succeeded in perverting the senate tallies.
 
If I understand it correctly, state governments across the nation, led by both Republican and Democratic secretaries-of-state and other election officials, coordinated bogus vote counts in multiple states, and the hundreds of individuals, both Republican and Democrat, who counted the votes, as well as the hundreds of individuals, both Republican and Democrat, charged with verifying and confirming those totals, were all complicit in the air-tight deception in which not one of those thousands of public servants, both Republican and Democrat, leaked a hint concerning the vast deceit they had planned and brilliantly engineered.

After nearly four years of national polls, in both private and public surveys, had attested, consistently, to Trump's relentless unpopularity with most Americans, this legion of bumptious bamboozlers made it appear that more folks would vote against him than for him. Go figure!

Curiously, all those thousands of wily and incredibly-secretive naughty people, both Republican and Democrat, in compiling their fraudulent tallies, orchestrated an increase of Republican seats in the House, and Senate results that favored Republicans keeping control of McConnell's upper chamber pot.

For such a monumental, masterful caper, one would imagine that such hyper-partisan masterminds would not be so egregiously negligent.

View attachment 412506
"ME! It's all about ME!"

View attachment 412507
"Stop making sense! It's all about
TRUMP!"


Suspects?

View attachment 412516
:uhoh3: :uhoh3: :uhoh3:
 
Assuming you are serious, the story is as follows:

Mail-in voting is fraught with opportunities for fraud. Generic ballots (ballots with no unique identifier) are mailed out to every name and address that the voting machine can locate. This includes people who have died, people who have moved, people who have not voted in many, many years. Usually mail in ballots number much more than the voting population. And of course the political parties are ALSO sending out mail-in ballots to their constituents.

Contrast this with "Absentee Ballots," where an individual, registered voter formally requests a ballot from the election authorities because for one reason or another they will not be able to vote in person (working out of state, can't get off work, etc.). These ballots only go out to legally registered voters, and they are uniquely identified with that voter. Usually a witness and a signature are on the Absentee Ballot, so there is little room for fraud.

So what could happen with Mail-in Ballots? People could just fill them out and mail them in with the names of random other people. Political operatives can determine which voters rarely vote, and submit Mail-ins for those people. If it turns out to be a duplicate, who cares? The sender cannot be identified. The election authorities in most cases are told that irregular signatures are NOT a reason to disqualify a ballot, which makes it even easier to commit fraud.

So the question is, if there were some political party or organization that WANTED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE of the much-too-loose controls on Mail-in voting, would they be able to do that? The answer is manifestly, yes.

Then you look at precincts in large inner cities (e.g., Philadelphia) where 100% of the Mail-in ballots are straight-ticket Democrat votes, and unless you are either stupid or compromised yourself, you think, There's something fishy going on here. Black males are voting Republican nationally at a rate of 15-20%, and yet in Philadelphia it is ZERO PERCENT? What. The. Fuck?
Amusing.

You need to pretend that elections in Utah and several other states that have conducted mail-in voting for years must be "fraught with opportunities for fraud" despite their records indicating the contrary, whereas flashing an easily-obtained fake ID at a poll nanny is a guarantee of legitimacy.

When Trump whined that millions of illegitimate voters cost him the popular vote in 2016, and his bogus ballot czar Kris K Kobach could find nary a one, how many of those magic, fraudulent votes were by mail?

No, a vast conspiracy that succeeded brilliantly in perverting the will of the electorate concerning your Trump (despite the results being entirely consistent with polling over the years) would not be so slipshod as to enhance the lot of Senate and House Republicans.

Accept reality, even if it is antithetical to your desires. The cult of trumpery has contrived no rational case for crapping on the democratic process. It has conjured up no credible evidence for its delusion.
What has one election got to do with the next one??????
 
to Trump's relentless unpopularity with most Americans
'''' in both private and public surveys, had attested,''''...'''' to Trump's relentless unpopularity with most Americans''''
right there your OP is total bullshit
...he is NOT unpopular with most Americans--the election proves it!!!!!
not ALL Americans voted

....they HATED him and tried everything in the book to get rid of him for 4 years!!!!!!! OF course they would try election fraud
Trump's fanatical bum kissers can mewl that there is some vast conspiracy to dethrone their failed casino operator and faded reality-tv performer while enhancing the power of Republicans in the House and Senate, but it makes them appear very, very silly.

In desperately trying to sell their vast conspiracy confection, they have yet to contrive any credible evidence.

They scream that their deity's political opponents should all be "locked up!", but they ignore the need for evidence under America's system of justice.


“If this stuff is going on that the president is talking about … it would undercut everything that we believe in in our system. But as a prosecutor, that’s like asking me to indict someone without showing me any evidence,” Christie continued. “If you’re gonna say those things from behind the podium at the White House, it’s his right to do it, it’s his right to pursue legal action, but show us the evidence.”

Christie said “we heard nothing today about any evidence” of the president’s claims.


You don't want the truth,
 

Forum List

Back
Top