2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,976
- 52,249
- 2,290
This is the problem...and it isn't guns. The democrats seem to need violent criminals back in the inner cities....they murder people, they drive up demand for tax dollars to fight them......which the democrats then take and use for everything except for locking up violent criminals....
Tell us anti-gunners....why in the world would California be lowering the prison time of violent gun offenders?
Can you explain that to normal people, please?
Hey.....anti-gunners....guess what...the NRA is actively fighting against this stupidity.....
California Democrats hate the gun, not the gunman – Orange County Register
Now that Democrats have supermajorities in the California state Legislature, they’ve rolled into Sacramento with a zest for lowering the state’s prison population and have interpreted St. Augustine’s words of wisdom to mean, “Hate the gun, not the gunman.”
I say this because, once they finally took a break from preaching about the benefits of stricter gun control, the state Senate voted to loosen sentencing guidelines for criminals convicted of gun crimes.
Currently, California law requires anyone who uses a gun while committing a felony to have their sentence increased by 10 years or more in prison — on top of the normal criminal penalty. If enacted, Senate Bill 620 would eliminate that mandate.
The bill, which passed on a 22-14 party-line vote, with support only from Democrats, now heads to the state Assembly for consideration.
Republicans and the National Rifle Association have vowed to campaign against it.
Why have Democrats suddenly developed a soft spot for criminals convicted of gun crimes? The bill’s author, state Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, says that he was motivated to write the bill after a 17-year-old riding in a car involved in a drive-by shooting was sentenced to 25 years in prison, even though he claims that he wasn’t the one who pulled the trigger.
and for all those anti-gunners who want to know where criminals get guns....well...this law lowers the prison time for those who give guns to criminals.....
Why is that?
Prop. 57, for example, very deceptively and fundamentally changed the definition of what constitutes a “non-violent” offense.
Now criminals convicted of the following crimes are eligible to be released from prison early: rape by intoxication, rape of an unconscious person, human trafficking involving sex acts with minors, drive-by shooting, assault with a deadly weapon, taking a hostage, domestic violence involving trauma,
supplying a firearm to a gang member,
lewd acts upon a child, hate crime causing physical injury, failing to register as a sex offender, arson causing great bodily injury,
felon obtaining a firearm,
discharging a firearm on school grounds
and false imprisonment of an elder. Just to name a few.
So...anti-gunners.........you have no leg to stand on when it comes to solving the gun problem......you don't care about gun crime....you hate gun owners....
Tell us anti-gunners....why in the world would California be lowering the prison time of violent gun offenders?
Can you explain that to normal people, please?
Hey.....anti-gunners....guess what...the NRA is actively fighting against this stupidity.....
California Democrats hate the gun, not the gunman – Orange County Register
Now that Democrats have supermajorities in the California state Legislature, they’ve rolled into Sacramento with a zest for lowering the state’s prison population and have interpreted St. Augustine’s words of wisdom to mean, “Hate the gun, not the gunman.”
I say this because, once they finally took a break from preaching about the benefits of stricter gun control, the state Senate voted to loosen sentencing guidelines for criminals convicted of gun crimes.
Currently, California law requires anyone who uses a gun while committing a felony to have their sentence increased by 10 years or more in prison — on top of the normal criminal penalty. If enacted, Senate Bill 620 would eliminate that mandate.
The bill, which passed on a 22-14 party-line vote, with support only from Democrats, now heads to the state Assembly for consideration.
Republicans and the National Rifle Association have vowed to campaign against it.
Why have Democrats suddenly developed a soft spot for criminals convicted of gun crimes? The bill’s author, state Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, says that he was motivated to write the bill after a 17-year-old riding in a car involved in a drive-by shooting was sentenced to 25 years in prison, even though he claims that he wasn’t the one who pulled the trigger.
and for all those anti-gunners who want to know where criminals get guns....well...this law lowers the prison time for those who give guns to criminals.....
Why is that?
Prop. 57, for example, very deceptively and fundamentally changed the definition of what constitutes a “non-violent” offense.
Now criminals convicted of the following crimes are eligible to be released from prison early: rape by intoxication, rape of an unconscious person, human trafficking involving sex acts with minors, drive-by shooting, assault with a deadly weapon, taking a hostage, domestic violence involving trauma,
supplying a firearm to a gang member,
lewd acts upon a child, hate crime causing physical injury, failing to register as a sex offender, arson causing great bodily injury,
felon obtaining a firearm,
discharging a firearm on school grounds
and false imprisonment of an elder. Just to name a few.
So...anti-gunners.........you have no leg to stand on when it comes to solving the gun problem......you don't care about gun crime....you hate gun owners....
Last edited:
