Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,101
- 245
CaféAuLait;6609381 said:CaféAuLait;6609343 said:( empahasis added)
I am hardly angry at you, I am unsure why you believe such.
Please show where it stated in the law the proscutor charged him with (PENAL CODE
SECTION 261-269) that he had to pretend to be her husband, there were many definitions there.
This is the code he was charged under as stated in the appeal:
CA Codes (pen:261-269)
Did you read the decision? The prosecutor argued that he pretended to be her husband during the trial, that made that a requirement of the crime. He was wrong, and the conviction was overturned.
No, I did not see that he argued such, can you point me to where it says that in the decision? I see a lot of legal and previous case jargon mentioning husband, but I do not see where it said he argued such. Maybe I am blind tonight?
Page 6.