California considering unprecedented law restricting police from fire arm use

[MindWars]

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.




Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...

Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================


It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/so-you-want-to-federalize-local-cops/

 

[Anathema]

And watch the exodus of LEOs from the state like rats fleeing a sinking ship.

 

[MindWars]

And watch the exodus of LEOs from the state like rats fleeing a sinking ship.

The bad thing is they are trying to push it Nationwide ever since Obama was in office.
I can't see Trump allowing this but anything is possible.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.




Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...

Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================


It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?

Right.

"Let them shoot you first."

 

[skye]

GOD Bless President Trump~

Two full terms for him and his political agenda!

The more the communist left restricts, the better chances for him!

 

[MindWars]

And for those who think my Obama statement is so fkn FUNNY take NOTICE of the article 2011 what asshole was in office in 2011 " OBAMA" ..

The federalization of local law enforcement

 

[MindWars]

The worst part is most people are clueless about the laws and how severely they differentiate compared to state..... They can do what the hell they want.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Is it possible to put a state into a mental institution?

 

[Montrovant]

This article gives a bit more detail about what the proposed legislation might mean in practical terms: California lawmakers propose legislation restricting when officers can open fire

I'm not sure what the president would have to do with this proposed state law.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

In the real world decent and competent people won't take the job with that kind of risk. Criminals will. Those who have skated by without arrests. They will use their positions as police to threaten and shake down citizens. They will take their real business off the clock and investigate the murders they committed. You want to see corruption blossom. Take the ability of these men and women to defend themselves away. During their shifts they will be hiding under the bed. Then make up for it off hours.

And California wants to disarm citizens too! It will be Colombia in no time.

 

[skookerasbil]

Only in California s0ns....

 

[toobfreak]

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.

Well, I'll be shocked if a single democrat or leftist opposes this! Because after all, they are the ones always screaming for "gun control!"

 

[BULLDOG]

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.




Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...

Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================


It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?

Why is everything you post a lie? Changing the rules to allow cops to shoot people only when necessary is a good thing. Why do all these nut bags think anyone is taking guns away from cops?

 

[skookerasbil]

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.




Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...

Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================


It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?

Why is everything you post a lie? Changing the rules to allow cops to shoot people only when necessary is a good thing. Why do all these nut bags think anyone is taking guns away from cops?

Dang...... talk about connect the dots issues....

One thing you can always be sure of in life.... when progressive ideas are put into practice more people end up dead. One only need to look at Baltimore after the riots a couple of years ago..... all these engagement restrictions placed on cops by the idiot progressive mayor. The ghetto areas in Baltimore became shooting galleries for bad guys.....who knew no cops were coming to help their victims.

Duh...... no elaboration necessary s0ns....

 

[Two Thumbs]

so CA is passing a law to fuck over their own police.


you can't write that on paper and get it published.

 

[skookerasbil]

I would say that if you have never visited California and want to see it you better go soon.... within 5 years it will be far safer to vacation in Pakistan.

 

[BULLDOG]

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.




Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...

Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================


It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?

Why is everything you post a lie? Changing the rules to allow cops to shoot people only when necessary is a good thing. Why do all these nut bags think anyone is taking guns away from cops?

Dang...... talk about connect the dots issues....

One thing you can always be sure of in life.... when progressive ideas are put into practice more people end up dead. One only need to look at Baltimore after the riots a couple of years ago..... all these engagement restrictions placed on cops by the idiot progressive mayor. The ghetto areas in Baltimore became shooting galleries for bad guys.....who knew no cops were coming to help their victims.

Duh...... no elaboration necessary s0ns....

So you are good with cops shooting people when it isn't necessary? That's all the proposal is. Don't shoot unless necessary.

 

[Two Thumbs]

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.




Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...

Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================


It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?

Why is everything you post a lie? Changing the rules to allow cops to shoot people only when necessary is a good thing. Why do all these nut bags think anyone is taking guns away from cops?

Dang...... talk about connect the dots issues....

One thing you can always be sure of in life.... when progressive ideas are put into practice more people end up dead. One only need to look at Baltimore after the riots a couple of years ago..... all these engagement restrictions placed on cops by the idiot progressive mayor. The ghetto areas in Baltimore became shooting galleries for bad guys.....who knew no cops were coming to help their victims.

Duh...... no elaboration necessary s0ns....

So you are good with cops shooting people when it isn't necessary? That's all the proposal is. Don't shoot unless necessary.

It's funny that you think cops do that now.

 

[BULLDOG]

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.




Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...

Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================


It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?

Why is everything you post a lie? Changing the rules to allow cops to shoot people only when necessary is a good thing. Why do all these nut bags think anyone is taking guns away from cops?

Dang...... talk about connect the dots issues....

One thing you can always be sure of in life.... when progressive ideas are put into practice more people end up dead. One only need to look at Baltimore after the riots a couple of years ago..... all these engagement restrictions placed on cops by the idiot progressive mayor. The ghetto areas in Baltimore became shooting galleries for bad guys.....who knew no cops were coming to help their victims.

Duh...... no elaboration necessary s0ns....

So you are good with cops shooting people when it isn't necessary? That's all the proposal is. Don't shoot unless necessary.

It's funny that you think cops do that now.

No, they don't have to. The rules now require that any shooting only needs to be reasonable, and he only has to justify that he thought his personal definition of reasonable was met. The proposal will change "reasonable" to "necessary", and he will have to justify why he thought it was necessary. What part of that is not better?

 

[Two Thumbs]

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.




Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...

Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================


It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?

Why is everything you post a lie? Changing the rules to allow cops to shoot people only when necessary is a good thing. Why do all these nut bags think anyone is taking guns away from cops?

Dang...... talk about connect the dots issues....

One thing you can always be sure of in life.... when progressive ideas are put into practice more people end up dead. One only need to look at Baltimore after the riots a couple of years ago..... all these engagement restrictions placed on cops by the idiot progressive mayor. The ghetto areas in Baltimore became shooting galleries for bad guys.....who knew no cops were coming to help their victims.

Duh...... no elaboration necessary s0ns....

So you are good with cops shooting people when it isn't necessary? That's all the proposal is. Don't shoot unless necessary.

It's funny that you think cops do that now.

No, they don't have to. The rules now require that any shooting only needs to be reasonable, and he only has to justify that he thought his personal definition of reasonable was met. The proposal will change "reasonable" to "necessary", and he will have to justify why he thought it was necessary. What part of that is not better?

the part where the cop chooses to not risk his life b/c he doesn't have time to determine weather or not he's going to be killed.