By EO: Obama bans import select firearms

[g5000]

Mad World NewsObama Administration Bans Import of Select Firearms by Executive Order


King Obama has spoken.

Reagan Renews Limited Sanctions on South Africa





King Reagan spoke.


The Lengthening List of Iran Sanctions

The Iran-Iraq Arms Nonproliferation Act (October 23, 1992) calls for sanctioning any person or entity that assists Tehran in weapons development or acquisition of "chemical, biological, nuclear, or destabilizing numbers and types of advanced conventional weapons." Subsequent nonproliferation orders include the Iran-Syria-North Korea Non-Proliferation Act, and Executive Order 13382 (PDF), signed by President Bush in June 2005.

Trade and investment. On April 30, 1995, President Bill Clinton announced a comprehensive ban on U.S. trade and investment in Iran, a move codified by Executive Order 12959 (PDF). In March 2010, President Barack Obama, like George W. Bush, renewed Clinton's executive order banning U.S. trade and investment with Iran.

Kings Clinton and Bush spoke.

Typical leftist drool^^^ Whenever their boy king is shown to be a war mongerer or all around fucking idiot, throw up someone else.

Typical idiot^^^ posted without understanding the legal or historical context of EOs and sanctions. Sorry to make your butt hurt.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Reagan Renews Limited Sanctions on South Africa





King Reagan spoke.


The Lengthening List of Iran Sanctions



Kings Clinton and Bush spoke.

Typical leftist drool^^^ Whenever their boy king is shown to be a war mongerer or all around fucking idiot, throw up someone else.

Typical idiot^^^ posted without understanding the legal or historical context of EOs and sanctions. Sorry to make your butt hurt.

Aren't you the same fucking moron who claimed OVER AND OVER in threads that the majority of Americans wanted the illegal kids to stay? I guess that ranks up there with your call for the Benghazi filmmaker to be put to death, right? If anyone's asshole is sore, it's yours.. We all know GWB abused the powers of the Presidency.. but your boy king takes it even further and yet all you do is suck is his nuts..Why is that?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Mad World NewsObama Administration Bans Import of Select Firearms by Executive Order
King Obama has spoken.

by your 'king obama' comment it would seem you don't believe he has the authority to do this - is that correct?

Seems that way.
From where does The Obama derive the authority to issue this order?
Existing legislation?
Powers granted to him by Article II of the Constitution?
Because he has a pen and is willing to use it?

 

[Avorysuds]

Sanctions is an act of war, plain and simple.

Refusing to buy or sell someone stuff is not an act of war, idiot.

Not all sanctions work like that, idiot. Sticking your dick into the economic affairs other countries do with Russia is in fact an act of war you dumb ****. If Russia told China to stop selling to the US "or else." That would be in contradiction to the well being and interests of the USA, thus a war appears on the horizon.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Mad World NewsObama Administration Bans Import of Select Firearms by Executive Order


King Obama has spoken.

So, we are doing sanctions on Russia, and now that includes guns. And you have your tail in a knot. Guess you want to support Putin by purchasing these guns and putting more money in the Russian treasury. You definition of patriotism is noted.

Sanctions is an act of war, plain and simple. Why is Obama trying to spark a war with Russia, why do you seem to support this?

Blockades are an act of war.
Refusing to trade is not.

 

[Avorysuds]

Reagan Renews Limited Sanctions on South Africa





King Reagan spoke.


The Lengthening List of Iran Sanctions



Kings Clinton and Bush spoke.

Typical leftist drool^^^ Whenever their boy king is shown to be a war mongerer or all around fucking idiot, throw up someone else.

Typical idiot^^^ posted without understanding the legal or historical context of EOs and sanctions. Sorry to make your butt hurt.

No actually you got nailed to the wall. You're intention was to use Reagan as a double standard, without ever discussing if LGS agreed with what Reagan did.

Basically, stick to the topic on hand and you won;t seem like a guy trying to hard to corner people.

 

[Avorysuds]

So, we are doing sanctions on Russia, and now that includes guns. And you have your tail in a knot. Guess you want to support Putin by purchasing these guns and putting more money in the Russian treasury. You definition of patriotism is noted.

Sanctions is an act of war, plain and simple. Why is Obama trying to spark a war with Russia, why do you seem to support this?

Blockades are an act of war.
Refusing to trade is not.

The US (Obama) forces others to not trade with Russia. That is an act of war.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Sanctions is an act of war, plain and simple. Why is Obama trying to spark a war with Russia, why do you seem to support this?

Blockades are an act of war.
Refusing to trade is not.

The US (Obama) forces others to not trade with Russia. That is an act of war.

Forces? I don't think so.

Sanctions are when you and your friends refuse to buy at a certain store store.
Blockades are when you and your friends refuse to let others buy at that certain store.

One is an act of war, the other is not.

 

[BlindBoo]

They were, they were overwhelmingly opposed to red lines and "action." The vast majority wanted Obama to stay out of it, just like they oppose him going back into Iraq. But Obama is a war president, more so than Bush so it's not shocking to me that he would just do what he wants.

The man who once claimed to be against the war powers act now loves the chit outa it.

How many invasions and occupation has President Obama proposed and led?

The war powers act limits the Presidents war making power.

Syria, Egypt, Pakistan, going back into Iraq, expanding Afghanistan and now creating conflict with Russia.

See, Obama, and the moronic fanbois on the left found that if they avoid "boot's on the ground" that it's not a war. They can supply people with weapons and intel, they can do air strikes and drones... But if you just avoid "boots on the ground" all that killing, all that money spent somehow magically does not count.

You will be remembered as the idiot generation of Democrats, Sorry, just how things are working out for you.

Pretty hard to invade and occupy a country without boot on the ground. He did endorse a round of escalations in Afghanistan, but that hardly qualifies him as being on par with President Bush, the failed war president.

You'll be remembered for thinking the war powers act gave the president war powers, so you have no business calling anyone generational idiots.

 

[Avorysuds]

Blockades are an act of war.
Refusing to trade is not.

The US (Obama) forces others to not trade with Russia. That is an act of war.

Forces? I don't think so.

Sanctions are when you and your friends refuse to buy at a certain store store.
Blockades are when you and your friends refuse to let others buy at that certain store.

One is an act of war, the other is not.

Lol, we have no friends. They do what we ask because we pay them and they fear loosing that deposit of funds. Thus we force them to not trade with Russia. You can see it how you like, you're wrong but that does not matter. If Russia's economy takes a hit and they decide to retaliate you can stand by it was not an act of war all you like, but you will still be wrong.

If the Us does not want to do business with Russia fine, but when we start asking (demanding) others to stop then we are attacking Russia's economy.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The US (Obama) forces others to not trade with Russia. That is an act of war.

Forces? I don't think so.

Sanctions are when you and your friends refuse to buy at a certain store store.
Blockades are when you and your friends refuse to let others buy at that certain store.

One is an act of war, the other is not.

Lol, we have no friends. They do what we ask because we pay them and they fear loosing that deposit of funds. Thus we force them to not trade with Russia. You can see it how you like, you're wrong but that does not matter. If Russia's economy takes a hit and they decide to retaliate you can stand by it was not an act of war all you like, but you will still be wrong.

If the Us does not want to do business with Russia fine, but when we start asking (demanding) others to stop then we are attacking Russia's economy.

Uh.... yeah.

 

[Avorysuds]

How many invasions and occupation has President Obama proposed and led?

The war powers act limits the Presidents war making power.

Syria, Egypt, Pakistan, going back into Iraq, expanding Afghanistan and now creating conflict with Russia.

See, Obama, and the moronic fanbois on the left found that if they avoid "boot's on the ground" that it's not a war. They can supply people with weapons and intel, they can do air strikes and drones... But if you just avoid "boots on the ground" all that killing, all that money spent somehow magically does not count.

You will be remembered as the idiot generation of Democrats, Sorry, just how things are working out for you.

Pretty hard to invade and occupy a country without boot on the ground. He did endorse a round of escalations in Afghanistan, but that hardly qualifies him as being on par with President Bush, the failed war president.

You'll be remembered for thinking the war powers act gave the president war powers, so you have no business calling anyone generational idiots.

The war powers allowed for quasi bullshit wars. Basically to get in there.

Obama expanded Afghanistan and Iraq, Obama claimed he would end Iraq as the "first thing he will do" once in office... he waited 3 years and ended it on the contract Bush set with Iraq, and now we're headed back in.... So yes, Obama had boots on the ground and was part of an occupation he said he would end directly after being elected.

We are literally coming up to the point where the wars will be going longer under Obama than they did Bush, so deal with being a war party.

 

[ogibillm]

Mad World NewsObama Administration Bans Import of Select Firearms by Executive Order
King Obama has spoken.

by your 'king obama' comment it would seem you don't believe he has the authority to do this - is that correct?

Seems that way.
From where does The Obama derive the authority to issue this order?
Existing legislation?
Powers granted to him by Article II of the Constitution?
Because he has a pen and is willing to use it?

those questions are answered in the actual executive order.

 

[Avorysuds]

Forces? I don't think so.

Sanctions are when you and your friends refuse to buy at a certain store store.
Blockades are when you and your friends refuse to let others buy at that certain store.

One is an act of war, the other is not.

Lol, we have no friends. They do what we ask because we pay them and they fear loosing that deposit of funds. Thus we force them to not trade with Russia. You can see it how you like, you're wrong but that does not matter. If Russia's economy takes a hit and they decide to retaliate you can stand by it was not an act of war all you like, but you will still be wrong.

If the Us does not want to do business with Russia fine, but when we start asking (demanding) others to stop then we are attacking Russia's economy.

Uh.... yeah.

That's what I thought. Keep painting red lines and see where that gets you.

 

[BlindBoo]

Always a pattern with liberals.. First deny, question the source.. once it's proven, create a strawman- once that has been shot down, use the extreme side of the position to paint your adversary...

LIBERALISM is a house of mirrors. It cannot stand on anything thus the continuous propaganda.. from one lie to the next. Just as we saw with the many posters here claiming that Americans want these illegal children to stay here.. We know that's a lie.

So are you opposed to sanctions against Russia overall or just the ones against importing those specific weapons?

 

[BlindBoo]

Syria, Egypt, Pakistan, going back into Iraq, expanding Afghanistan and now creating conflict with Russia.

See, Obama, and the moronic fanbois on the left found that if they avoid "boot's on the ground" that it's not a war. They can supply people with weapons and intel, they can do air strikes and drones... But if you just avoid "boots on the ground" all that killing, all that money spent somehow magically does not count.

You will be remembered as the idiot generation of Democrats, Sorry, just how things are working out for you.

Pretty hard to invade and occupy a country without boot on the ground. He did endorse a round of escalations in Afghanistan, but that hardly qualifies him as being on par with President Bush, the failed war president.

You'll be remembered for thinking the war powers act gave the president war powers, so you have no business calling anyone generational idiots.

The war powers allowed for quasi bullshit wars. Basically to get in there.

Obama expanded Afghanistan and Iraq, Obama claimed he would end Iraq as the "first thing he will do" once in office... he waited 3 years and ended it on the contract Bush set with Iraq, and now we're headed back in.... So yes, Obama had boots on the ground and was part of an occupation he said he would end directly after being elected.

We are literally coming up to the point where the wars will be going longer under Obama than they did Bush, so deal with being a war party.

Your understanding of that act is contrary to known reality.

President Obama tried to leave a residual force in Iraq, just like Bush did. He did follow what President Bush agree to. It was the Iraqis call to have us leave, not those presidents. The Iraqis asked for help and as of yet I don't think we have committed any troops to fight for Maliki. Democrats have always been a war party. Until the SDS in the 60's.........Obama doesn't follow the ideology of the so called domestic terrorist Bill Ayers.