- Thread starter
- #41
7. Let's flesh out the Franklin Roosevelt we have come to know.
Neither law nor business beckoned. But Roosevelt could influence men! That was his métier!
Oliver Wendell Holmes observed that Roosevelt had "a second class intellect. But a first-class temperament!"
It was all about smiles, handshakes, and speeches! And without a teleprompter, no less!
a. Later Woodrow Wilson found a certain simpatico with Roosevelt, and appointed him as Assistant Secretary of the Navy. And Roosevelt seemed to assimilate Wilson's view of what a politician should be.
a.In his 1890 essay, “Leaders of Men,” Wilson explained that a “true leader” uses the masses like “tools.” He must inflame their passions with little heed for the facts.
“Men are as clay in the hands of the consummate leader.” “No doubt a lot of nonsense has been talked about the inalienable rights of the individual, and a great deal that was mere sentiment and pleasing speculation has been put forward as fundamental principle,” wrote Wilson, attacking the very individual rights that have made America great.
He rejected the principles of “separation of powers” and “checks and balances” that are the foundation of American government:
“Government does now whatever experience permits or the times demand….” wrote Wilson in "The State."
Meaning, whatever the President/King decided.
Sounds a lot like the Franklin Roosevelt we know, doesn't it.
Neither law nor business beckoned. But Roosevelt could influence men! That was his métier!
Oliver Wendell Holmes observed that Roosevelt had "a second class intellect. But a first-class temperament!"
It was all about smiles, handshakes, and speeches! And without a teleprompter, no less!
a. Later Woodrow Wilson found a certain simpatico with Roosevelt, and appointed him as Assistant Secretary of the Navy. And Roosevelt seemed to assimilate Wilson's view of what a politician should be.
a.In his 1890 essay, “Leaders of Men,” Wilson explained that a “true leader” uses the masses like “tools.” He must inflame their passions with little heed for the facts.
“Men are as clay in the hands of the consummate leader.” “No doubt a lot of nonsense has been talked about the inalienable rights of the individual, and a great deal that was mere sentiment and pleasing speculation has been put forward as fundamental principle,” wrote Wilson, attacking the very individual rights that have made America great.
He rejected the principles of “separation of powers” and “checks and balances” that are the foundation of American government:
“Government does now whatever experience permits or the times demand….” wrote Wilson in "The State."
Meaning, whatever the President/King decided.
Sounds a lot like the Franklin Roosevelt we know, doesn't it.
Last edited: