What you're mistaken about is thinking the SCOTUS job is to write legislation and invent reasons to add people of other groups to a lawsuit. The people that filed the grievance were gays... not bigamists. You can't force the gays to invite bigamists into their grievance ... nor can you force bigamists to join the homosexuals.
View attachment 50134
The argument used in court by the SSM crowd was that mature willing adults should be allowed to marry as they choose.....
Are you now saying that bigamists are not mature willing companions?
*****SMILE*****
No i said the opposite. Accusing me of saying the opposite of what I said makes you look like a moron.
Isn't that the argument that they used to justify the ruling that they are mature willing adults in this thread and during the court ruling?
Yes I do believe it was.
So instead of calling me a moron just answer the question instead of displaying your discrimination for all to see.
*****CHUCKLE*****
I answered the question twice. I have no idea why you feel you need to keep asking me the same question. Short term memory loss?
Then you agree that the bigamists and any other mature willing companions should be able to pick up their marriage licenses without bother because if they can't then the 14th Amendment is being violated.
Otherwise any minority group that isn't black has received minority benefits when they shouldn't have since the 14th Amendment and Civil Rights Act was only enacted for the blacks and their court cases.
*****CHUCKLE*****
There have been multiple civil rights acts. It's not just for blacks.. Look it up. Are you used to being wrong all the time?