British cop asks... is it okay in your culture for a man to date a 12 year old?

[Tilly]

This is a great example of fake news.

A policeman doing his job and making enquiries. It gets picked up and twisted to make him look like an enabler. Theen a dickhead like the OP tries to give it some traction amongst the low information.

Lol. If the policeman was actually doing his job instead of being worried about being ‘culturally insensitive’ he would have arrested the paedo without having to phone a charity.
That you think this is OK is not surprising though, as you also don’t seem to have a problem with the authorities turning a blind eye to the muslim paedo gangs operating with impugnity.

Do you think the PC would have phoned a charity if the paedo was a white English Male???

It is precisely this PC crap that has resulted in thousands upon thousands of British children being drugged, trafficked, beaten, prostituted and gang raped by the muslim paedo filth gangs for the last four decades.

If you actually read the story you will see that the officer had already arrested the suspect.

Which kind of invalidates the rest of your rant.

But I will point out the following to you.

If a case is going to court the police have to present a file to the CPS who then make a decision on whether to proceed or not. As part of that the Police have to make as strong a case as possible. The officers research in this instance destroyed the pervs defence and made the case for prosecution stronger.

Wouldnt you agree that this officer was diligent and did a very good job ?

No, YOU seem to be missing the point, Tammy.

The officer phoned a charity to find out if it was the norm for Iraqi men to have relationships with children as he didn’t want to be ‘culturally insensitive’ FFS.

This is the U.K. - it is not OK for a man of whatever origin or belief to have a relationship of that nature with a child, and it is of no relevance to the officer wether the suspected paedo BELIEVES otherwise or not.

BTW, most paedos think there’s nothing wrong with their perversion either, and that is irrelevant too.

Do police officers treat white British paedos with kid gloves for fear of offending them since they believe there is nothing wrong with their proclivities? NO. And that’s how it should be REGARDLESS OF WHO THE PERP IS.

Our behaviour and attitudes should not change because the man allegedly believes it’s all fine for WHATEVER REASON,- yet the police officer was more concerned about cultural sensitivity than anything else.

This is the attitude that led to the disgusting abuse of thousands of young girls all across the nation. But I’m not at all surprised you are OK with it, as you’ve done nothing but obfuscate and make excuses since Rotherham was exposed, and you’ve never even expressed sympathy for the children raped.

The officer SHOULD NOT have had to phone anyone to check if it was a cultural norm for a grown man to be with a child in this way as it is irrelevant and not something a police officer - of all people - should be concerned about on the basis of perhaps hurting the suspected paedophiles feewings!

Wether the officer treated the man with extra sensitivity or not is also totally irrelevant to whether the CPS believes they can pursue a prosecution or not, you creepy tard, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY the charity pointed out the obvious when it advised “deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator”.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Maybe he should have called Roy Moore

Well, that sure makes it o.k., I guess.

Thanks for weighing in on the subject.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

This is a great example of fake news.

A policeman doing his job and making enquiries. It gets picked up and twisted to make him look like an enabler. Theen a dickhead like the OP tries to give it some traction amongst the low information.

Death......Taxes...… Tammy displaying cultural sensitivity whenever Muslims fuck children.

 

[Tilly]

This is a great example of fake news.

A policeman doing his job and making enquiries. It gets picked up and twisted to make him look like an enabler. Theen a dickhead like the OP tries to give it some traction amongst the low information.

How is it fake news? It happened. A police officer thought it important to not hurt the feelings of a suspected child raper if it turned out the child raper believed he was entitled to rape a child.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

This is a great example of fake news.

A policeman doing his job and making enquiries. It gets picked up and twisted to make him look like an enabler. Theen a dickhead like the OP tries to give it some traction amongst the low information.

Lol. If the policeman was actually doing his job instead of being worried about being ‘culturally insensitive’ he would have arrested the paedo without having to phone a charity.
That you think this is OK is not surprising though, as you also don’t seem to have a problem with the authorities turning a blind eye to the muslim paedo gangs operating with impugnity.

Do you think the PC would have phoned a charity if the paedo was a white English Male???

It is precisely this PC crap that has resulted in thousands upon thousands of British children being drugged, trafficked, beaten, prostituted and gang raped by the muslim paedo filth gangs for the last four decades.

If you actually read the story you will see that the officer had already arrested the suspect.

Which kind of invalidates the rest of your rant.

But I will point out the following to you.

If a case is going to court the police have to present a file to the CPS who then make a decision on whether to proceed or not. As part of that the Police have to make as strong a case as possible. The officers research in this instance destroyed the pervs defence and made the case for prosecution stronger.

Wouldnt you agree that this officer was diligent and did a very good job ?

No, YOU seem to be missing the point, Tammy.

The officer phoned a charity to find out if it was the norm for Iraqi men to have relationships with children as he didn’t want to be ‘culturally insensitive’ FFS.

This is the U.K. - it is not OK for a man of whatever origin or belief to have a relationship of that nature with a child, and it is of no relevance to the officer wether the suspected paedo BELIEVES otherwise or not.

BTW, most paedos think there’s nothing wrong with their perversion either, and that is irrelevant too.

Do police officers treat white British paedos with kid gloves for fear of offending them since they believe there is nothing wrong with their proclivities? NO. And that’s how it should be REGARDLESS OF WHO THE PERP IS.

Our behaviour and attitudes should not change because the man allegedly believes it’s all fine for WHATEVER REASON,- yet the police officer was more concerned about cultural sensitivity than anything else.

This is the attitude that led to the disgusting abuse of thousands of young girls all across the nation. But I’m not at all surprised you are OK with it, as you’ve done nothing but obfuscate and make excuses since Rotherham was exposed, and you’ve never even expressed sympathy for the children raped.

The officer SHOULD NOT have had to phone anyone to check if it was a cultural norm for a grown man to be with a child in this way as it is irrelevant and not something a police officer - of all people - should be concerned about on the basis of perhaps hurting the suspected paedophiles feewings!

Wether the officer treated the man with extra sensitivity or not is also totally irrelevant to whether the CPS believes they can pursue a prosecution or not, you creepy tard, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY the charity pointed out the obvious when it advised “deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator”.

Sigh .

Maybe if you had read the story you would have understood that the Officer had arrested the Perv and was doing some checks which ensured that the perv will get a longer sentence.
Those of us who want to see kids protected applaud that.
Those of you who just want to hang muslims are so blinded by hatred that you will never get it.
Just to repeat - the officer had already arrested the perv. Its not difficult hun.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

"NAMBLA? Oh, yes, this is officer Jones calling. I just wanted to show some cultural sensitivity here by asking your opinion on fucking 12 year old boys. Is it ok? It is? We'll, thanks so much. I'm feeling more culturally sensitive already!"

 

[rightwinger]

Republican culture supports trolling the malls looking for 14 year olds

 

[2aguy]

The lies about Roy Moore reached their half life and died.

Evidently not

He liked to date young teens just like that Muslim guy

The OP condemns Muslim culture for allowing older men to date young girls

Yet, Republican culture encourages the same thing

Republicans? You mean the democrats who run Hollywood, who allow convicted child molestors to continue to work in the industry, and give them awards and honor them, and the democrat controlled public schools where sex offenders are protected by the democrat unions...

You can lie about republicans, but the truth about democrats is there for all to see...

Who are the child molesters working in the "Hollywood" industry? Which ones received awards and what were the awards? I do not follow Hollywood news.

Roman Polanski for one, he got an academy award and a standing ovation as he hid in Europe after raping a 13 year old girl.....

Also, the guy who made Clown House and Jeepers Creeper....... child molestation is covered up by the hollywood establishment and that establishment is democrat.....

There is also this...

What Happened To The Hollywood Men Accused Of Child Sexual Abuse In 'An Open Secret' Documentary

Is Hollywood's next scandal an alleged pedophilia ring?

The Next Big Hollywood Sex Scandal is Already Breaking...at Nickelodeon

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Yep..... Britain is dying.... they can no longer defend their western values against 3rd world immigrant culture...

'Culturally Sensitive': Officer Asked if Iraqi Paedo Can Date 12-Year-Old

A British police officer called a charity to ask if it were acceptable for an Iraqi man to date a 12-year-old girl because he wanted to be “culturally sensitive” when dealing with a suspected paedophile.
An unnamed police detective called the charity Karma Nirvana, which tackles forced marriage and other forms of ‘honour-based’ abuse, after he had arrested a 26-year-old Iraqi man who said that in his culture, it was acceptable for him to be in a relationship with a child, according to the charity’s call logs seen by The Times.

According to the call log, the policeman said “the accused is stating that it is ‘completely acceptable in my culture to be with a 12-year-old’.”

The record added that the officer “‘just wished to know if it is accepted in Iraqi culture to be with a 12-year-old girl’ as he wished to be ‘culturally sensitive’”.

The charity advised that he deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator.

...........but the left wingers told everyone that diversity would be great
.......bride auction

 

[Dogmaphobe]

This is a great example of fake news.

A policeman doing his job and making enquiries. It gets picked up and twisted to make him look like an enabler. Theen a dickhead like the OP tries to give it some traction amongst the low information.

Lol. If the policeman was actually doing his job instead of being worried about being ‘culturally insensitive’ he would have arrested the paedo without having to phone a charity.
That you think this is OK is not surprising though, as you also don’t seem to have a problem with the authorities turning a blind eye to the muslim paedo gangs operating with impugnity.

Do you think the PC would have phoned a charity if the paedo was a white English Male???

It is precisely this PC crap that has resulted in thousands upon thousands of British children being drugged, trafficked, beaten, prostituted and gang raped by the muslim paedo filth gangs for the last four decades.

If you actually read the story you will see that the officer had already arrested the suspect.

Which kind of invalidates the rest of your rant.

But I will point out the following to you.

If a case is going to court the police have to present a file to the CPS who then make a decision on whether to proceed or not. As part of that the Police have to make as strong a case as possible. The officers research in this instance destroyed the pervs defence and made the case for prosecution stronger.

Wouldnt you agree that this officer was diligent and did a very good job ?

No, YOU seem to be missing the point, Tammy.

The officer phoned a charity to find out if it was the norm for Iraqi men to have relationships with children as he didn’t want to be ‘culturally insensitive’ FFS.

This is the U.K. - it is not OK for a man of whatever origin or belief to have a relationship of that nature with a child, and it is of no relevance to the officer wether the suspected paedo BELIEVES otherwise or not.

BTW, most paedos think there’s nothing wrong with their perversion either, and that is irrelevant too.

Do police officers treat white British paedos with kid gloves for fear of offending them since they believe there is nothing wrong with their proclivities? NO. And that’s how it should be REGARDLESS OF WHO THE PERP IS.

Our behaviour and attitudes should not change because the man allegedly believes it’s all fine for WHATEVER REASON,- yet the police officer was more concerned about cultural sensitivity than anything else.

This is the attitude that led to the disgusting abuse of thousands of young girls all across the nation. But I’m not at all surprised you are OK with it, as you’ve done nothing but obfuscate and make excuses since Rotherham was exposed, and you’ve never even expressed sympathy for the children raped.

The officer SHOULD NOT have had to phone anyone to check if it was a cultural norm for a grown man to be with a child in this way as it is irrelevant and not something a police officer - of all people - should be concerned about on the basis of perhaps hurting the suspected paedophiles feewings!

Wether the officer treated the man with extra sensitivity or not is also totally irrelevant to whether the CPS believes they can pursue a prosecution or not, you creepy tard, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY the charity pointed out the obvious when it advised “deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator”.

Sigh .

Maybe if you had read the story you would have understood that the Officer had arrested the Perv and was doing some checks which ensured that the perv will get a longer sentence.
Those of us who want to see kids protected applaud that.
Those of you who just want to hang muslims are so blinded by hatred that you will never get it.
Just to repeat - the officer had already arrested the perv. Its not difficult hun.

The article said nothing of

Republican culture supports trolling the malls looking for 14 year olds

you should look up the term tu quoque. .

I realize your goal is to defend Muslims having sex with children, but this is a particularly stupid way to go about it.

 

[2aguy]

This is a great example of fake news.

A policeman doing his job and making enquiries. It gets picked up and twisted to make him look like an enabler. Theen a dickhead like the OP tries to give it some traction amongst the low information.

Lol. If the policeman was actually doing his job instead of being worried about being ‘culturally insensitive’ he would have arrested the paedo without having to phone a charity.
That you think this is OK is not surprising though, as you also don’t seem to have a problem with the authorities turning a blind eye to the muslim paedo gangs operating with impugnity.

Do you think the PC would have phoned a charity if the paedo was a white English Male???

It is precisely this PC crap that has resulted in thousands upon thousands of British children being drugged, trafficked, beaten, prostituted and gang raped by the muslim paedo filth gangs for the last four decades.

If you actually read the story you will see that the officer had already arrested the suspect.

Which kind of invalidates the rest of your rant.

But I will point out the following to you.

If a case is going to court the police have to present a file to the CPS who then make a decision on whether to proceed or not. As part of that the Police have to make as strong a case as possible. The officers research in this instance destroyed the pervs defence and made the case for prosecution stronger.

Wouldnt you agree that this officer was diligent and did a very good job ?

No, YOU seem to be missing the point, Tammy.

The officer phoned a charity to find out if it was the norm for Iraqi men to have relationships with children as he didn’t want to be ‘culturally insensitive’ FFS.

This is the U.K. - it is not OK for a man of whatever origin or belief to have a relationship of that nature with a child, and it is of no relevance to the officer wether the suspected paedo BELIEVES otherwise or not.

BTW, most paedos think there’s nothing wrong with their perversion either, and that is irrelevant too.

Do police officers treat white British paedos with kid gloves for fear of offending them since they believe there is nothing wrong with their proclivities? NO. And that’s how it should be REGARDLESS OF WHO THE PERP IS.

Our behaviour and attitudes should not change because the man allegedly believes it’s all fine for WHATEVER REASON,- yet the police officer was more concerned about cultural sensitivity than anything else.

This is the attitude that led to the disgusting abuse of thousands of young girls all across the nation. But I’m not at all surprised you are OK with it, as you’ve done nothing but obfuscate and make excuses since Rotherham was exposed, and you’ve never even expressed sympathy for the children raped.

The officer SHOULD NOT have had to phone anyone to check if it was a cultural norm for a grown man to be with a child in this way as it is irrelevant and not something a police officer - of all people - should be concerned about on the basis of perhaps hurting the suspected paedophiles feewings!

Wether the officer treated the man with extra sensitivity or not is also totally irrelevant to whether the CPS believes they can pursue a prosecution or not, you creepy tard, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY the charity pointed out the obvious when it advised “deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator”.

Sigh .

Maybe if you had read the story you would have understood that the Officer had arrested the Perv and was doing some checks which ensured that the perv will get a longer sentence.
Those of us who want to see kids protected applaud that.
Those of you who just want to hang muslims are so blinded by hatred that you will never get it.
Just to repeat - the officer had already arrested the perv. Its not difficult hun.

Moron..... the Rotherham scandal shows you are wrong if not lying.....

this happened because the police and other government agents didn't want to be tagged as islamaphobic...

Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal - Wikipedia

From January 2011 Andrew Norfolk of The Times pressed the issue, reporting in 2012 that the abuse in the town was widespread, and that the police and council had known about it for over ten years.[a]
-----

The failure to address the abuse was attributed to a combination of factors revolving around race, class and gender—contemptuous and sexist attitudes toward the mostly working-class victims; fear that the perpetrators' ethnicity would trigger allegations of racism and damage community relations; the Labour council's reluctance to challenge a Labour-voting ethnic minority; lack of a child-centred focus; a desire to protect the town's reputation; and lack of training and resources.[32][33][16]

Rotherham Council's chief executive, its director of children's services, and the Police and Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire Police all resigned.[34]

 

[Dogmaphobe]

This is a great example of fake news.

A policeman doing his job and making enquiries. It gets picked up and twisted to make him look like an enabler. Theen a dickhead like the OP tries to give it some traction amongst the low information.

Lol. If the policeman was actually doing his job instead of being worried about being ‘culturally insensitive’ he would have arrested the paedo without having to phone a charity.
That you think this is OK is not surprising though, as you also don’t seem to have a problem with the authorities turning a blind eye to the muslim paedo gangs operating with impugnity.

Do you think the PC would have phoned a charity if the paedo was a white English Male???

It is precisely this PC crap that has resulted in thousands upon thousands of British children being drugged, trafficked, beaten, prostituted and gang raped by the muslim paedo filth gangs for the last four decades.

If you actually read the story you will see that the officer had already arrested the suspect.

Which kind of invalidates the rest of your rant.

But I will point out the following to you.

If a case is going to court the police have to present a file to the CPS who then make a decision on whether to proceed or not. As part of that the Police have to make as strong a case as possible. The officers research in this instance destroyed the pervs defence and made the case for prosecution stronger.

Wouldnt you agree that this officer was diligent and did a very good job ?

No, YOU seem to be missing the point, Tammy.

The officer phoned a charity to find out if it was the norm for Iraqi men to have relationships with children as he didn’t want to be ‘culturally insensitive’ FFS.

This is the U.K. - it is not OK for a man of whatever origin or belief to have a relationship of that nature with a child, and it is of no relevance to the officer wether the suspected paedo BELIEVES otherwise or not.

BTW, most paedos think there’s nothing wrong with their perversion either, and that is irrelevant too.

Do police officers treat white British paedos with kid gloves for fear of offending them since they believe there is nothing wrong with their proclivities? NO. And that’s how it should be REGARDLESS OF WHO THE PERP IS.

Our behaviour and attitudes should not change because the man allegedly believes it’s all fine for WHATEVER REASON,- yet the police officer was more concerned about cultural sensitivity than anything else.

This is the attitude that led to the disgusting abuse of thousands of young girls all across the nation. But I’m not at all surprised you are OK with it, as you’ve done nothing but obfuscate and make excuses since Rotherham was exposed, and you’ve never even expressed sympathy for the children raped.

The officer SHOULD NOT have had to phone anyone to check if it was a cultural norm for a grown man to be with a child in this way as it is irrelevant and not something a police officer - of all people - should be concerned about on the basis of perhaps hurting the suspected paedophiles feewings!

Wether the officer treated the man with extra sensitivity or not is also totally irrelevant to whether the CPS believes they can pursue a prosecution or not, you creepy tard, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY the charity pointed out the obvious when it advised “deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator”.

Sigh .

Maybe if you had read the story you would have understood that the Officer had arrested the Perv and was doing some checks which ensured that the perv will get a longer sentence.
Those of us who want to see kids protected applaud that.
Those of you who just want to hang muslims are so blinded by hatred that you will never get it.
Just to repeat - the officer had already arrested the perv. Its not difficult hun.

Moron..... the Rotherham scandal shows you are wrong if not lying.....

this happened because the police and other government agents didn't want to be tagged as islamaphobic...

Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal - Wikipedia

From January 2011 Andrew Norfolk of The Times pressed the issue, reporting in 2012 that the abuse in the town was widespread, and that the police and council had known about it for over ten years.[a]
-----

The failure to address the abuse was attributed to a combination of factors revolving around race, class and gender—contemptuous and sexist attitudes toward the mostly working-class victims; fear that the perpetrators' ethnicity would trigger allegations of racism and damage community relations; the Labour council's reluctance to challenge a Labour-voting ethnic minority; lack of a child-centred focus; a desire to protect the town's reputation; and lack of training and resources.[32][33][16]

Rotherham Council's chief executive, its director of children's services, and the Police and Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire Police all resigned.[34]

He is definitely lying

He tied to claim the officer was just trying to strengthen his case when the article said nothing of the sort.

 

[miketx]

Oh look at all the liberals defending pedophiles and then will later claim no one is defending it.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Oh look at all the liberals defending pedophiles and then claiming no one is defending it.

No liberals, just leftist useful idiots.

If they were liberal, their concern would be for the children. They most obviously have none.

 

[Tilly]

This is a great example of fake news.

A policeman doing his job and making enquiries. It gets picked up and twisted to make him look like an enabler. Theen a dickhead like the OP tries to give it some traction amongst the low information.

Lol. If the policeman was actually doing his job instead of being worried about being ‘culturally insensitive’ he would have arrested the paedo without having to phone a charity.
That you think this is OK is not surprising though, as you also don’t seem to have a problem with the authorities turning a blind eye to the muslim paedo gangs operating with impugnity.

Do you think the PC would have phoned a charity if the paedo was a white English Male???

It is precisely this PC crap that has resulted in thousands upon thousands of British children being drugged, trafficked, beaten, prostituted and gang raped by the muslim paedo filth gangs for the last four decades.

If you actually read the story you will see that the officer had already arrested the suspect.

Which kind of invalidates the rest of your rant.

But I will point out the following to you.

If a case is going to court the police have to present a file to the CPS who then make a decision on whether to proceed or not. As part of that the Police have to make as strong a case as possible. The officers research in this instance destroyed the pervs defence and made the case for prosecution stronger.

Wouldnt you agree that this officer was diligent and did a very good job ?

No, YOU seem to be missing the point, Tammy.

The officer phoned a charity to find out if it was the norm for Iraqi men to have relationships with children as he didn’t want to be ‘culturally insensitive’ FFS.

This is the U.K. - it is not OK for a man of whatever origin or belief to have a relationship of that nature with a child, and it is of no relevance to the officer wether the suspected paedo BELIEVES otherwise or not.

BTW, most paedos think there’s nothing wrong with their perversion either, and that is irrelevant too.

Do police officers treat white British paedos with kid gloves for fear of offending them since they believe there is nothing wrong with their proclivities? NO. And that’s how it should be REGARDLESS OF WHO THE PERP IS.

Our behaviour and attitudes should not change because the man allegedly believes it’s all fine for WHATEVER REASON,- yet the police officer was more concerned about cultural sensitivity than anything else.

This is the attitude that led to the disgusting abuse of thousands of young girls all across the nation. But I’m not at all surprised you are OK with it, as you’ve done nothing but obfuscate and make excuses since Rotherham was exposed, and you’ve never even expressed sympathy for the children raped.

The officer SHOULD NOT have had to phone anyone to check if it was a cultural norm for a grown man to be with a child in this way as it is irrelevant and not something a police officer - of all people - should be concerned about on the basis of perhaps hurting the suspected paedophiles feewings!

Wether the officer treated the man with extra sensitivity or not is also totally irrelevant to whether the CPS believes they can pursue a prosecution or not, you creepy tard, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY the charity pointed out the obvious when it advised “deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator”.

Sigh .

Maybe if you had read the story you would have understood that the Officer had arrested the Perv and was doing some checks which ensured that the perv will get a longer sentence.
Those of us who want to see kids protected applaud that.
Those of you who just want to hang muslims are so blinded by hatred that you will never get it.
Just to repeat - the officer had already arrested the perv. Its not difficult hun.

I know he had arrested the perv, you ****. But proceeding to contact a charity to confirm that it is culturally OK for them to rape little girls is NOT going to help the CPS prosecute him nor would it ensure he gets a longer sentence -as you well know.

In fact, such arguments have been used throughout European courts to effect the opposite outcome, as you also well know, which is why you approve of the authorities looking for ‘mitigating’ circumstances.

Who exactly do you think you are kidding with your taqyyia, Tammy?

 

[Tilly]

Lol. If the policeman was actually doing his job instead of being worried about being ‘culturally insensitive’ he would have arrested the paedo without having to phone a charity.
That you think this is OK is not surprising though, as you also don’t seem to have a problem with the authorities turning a blind eye to the muslim paedo gangs operating with impugnity.

Do you think the PC would have phoned a charity if the paedo was a white English Male???

It is precisely this PC crap that has resulted in thousands upon thousands of British children being drugged, trafficked, beaten, prostituted and gang raped by the muslim paedo filth gangs for the last four decades.

If you actually read the story you will see that the officer had already arrested the suspect.

Which kind of invalidates the rest of your rant.

But I will point out the following to you.

If a case is going to court the police have to present a file to the CPS who then make a decision on whether to proceed or not. As part of that the Police have to make as strong a case as possible. The officers research in this instance destroyed the pervs defence and made the case for prosecution stronger.

Wouldnt you agree that this officer was diligent and did a very good job ?

No, YOU seem to be missing the point, Tammy.

The officer phoned a charity to find out if it was the norm for Iraqi men to have relationships with children as he didn’t want to be ‘culturally insensitive’ FFS.

This is the U.K. - it is not OK for a man of whatever origin or belief to have a relationship of that nature with a child, and it is of no relevance to the officer wether the suspected paedo BELIEVES otherwise or not.

BTW, most paedos think there’s nothing wrong with their perversion either, and that is irrelevant too.

Do police officers treat white British paedos with kid gloves for fear of offending them since they believe there is nothing wrong with their proclivities? NO. And that’s how it should be REGARDLESS OF WHO THE PERP IS.

Our behaviour and attitudes should not change because the man allegedly believes it’s all fine for WHATEVER REASON,- yet the police officer was more concerned about cultural sensitivity than anything else.

This is the attitude that led to the disgusting abuse of thousands of young girls all across the nation. But I’m not at all surprised you are OK with it, as you’ve done nothing but obfuscate and make excuses since Rotherham was exposed, and you’ve never even expressed sympathy for the children raped.

The officer SHOULD NOT have had to phone anyone to check if it was a cultural norm for a grown man to be with a child in this way as it is irrelevant and not something a police officer - of all people - should be concerned about on the basis of perhaps hurting the suspected paedophiles feewings!

Wether the officer treated the man with extra sensitivity or not is also totally irrelevant to whether the CPS believes they can pursue a prosecution or not, you creepy tard, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY the charity pointed out the obvious when it advised “deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator”.

Sigh .

Maybe if you had read the story you would have understood that the Officer had arrested the Perv and was doing some checks which ensured that the perv will get a longer sentence.
Those of us who want to see kids protected applaud that.
Those of you who just want to hang muslims are so blinded by hatred that you will never get it.
Just to repeat - the officer had already arrested the perv. Its not difficult hun.

Moron..... the Rotherham scandal shows you are wrong if not lying.....

this happened because the police and other government agents didn't want to be tagged as islamaphobic...

Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal - Wikipedia

From January 2011 Andrew Norfolk of The Times pressed the issue, reporting in 2012 that the abuse in the town was widespread, and that the police and council had known about it for over ten years.[a]
-----

The failure to address the abuse was attributed to a combination of factors revolving around race, class and gender—contemptuous and sexist attitudes toward the mostly working-class victims; fear that the perpetrators' ethnicity would trigger allegations of racism and damage community relations; the Labour council's reluctance to challenge a Labour-voting ethnic minority; lack of a child-centred focus; a desire to protect the town's reputation; and lack of training and resources.[32][33][16]

Rotherham Council's chief executive, its director of children's services, and the Police and Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire Police all resigned.[34]

He is definitely lying

He tied to claim the officer was just trying to strengthen his case when the article said nothing of the sort.

Exactly. How on earth would it strengthen the case to mitigate it by saying the man knows no better as it is the norm in his culture??? Lol.
Tammy knows that the exact opposite is true, that’s why he’s applauding it.

 

[Tilly]

Oh look at all the liberals defending pedophiles and then will later claim no one is defending it.

Over and over again they defend the utterly filthy paedos and express absolutley no outrage-or even sympathy for the kids. It’s absolutley sickening.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

This is a great example of fake news.

A policeman doing his job and making enquiries. It gets picked up and twisted to make him look like an enabler. Theen a dickhead like the OP tries to give it some traction amongst the low information.

Lol. If the policeman was actually doing his job instead of being worried about being ‘culturally insensitive’ he would have arrested the paedo without having to phone a charity.
That you think this is OK is not surprising though, as you also don’t seem to have a problem with the authorities turning a blind eye to the muslim paedo gangs operating with impugnity.

Do you think the PC would have phoned a charity if the paedo was a white English Male???

It is precisely this PC crap that has resulted in thousands upon thousands of British children being drugged, trafficked, beaten, prostituted and gang raped by the muslim paedo filth gangs for the last four decades.

If you actually read the story you will see that the officer had already arrested the suspect.

Which kind of invalidates the rest of your rant.

But I will point out the following to you.

If a case is going to court the police have to present a file to the CPS who then make a decision on whether to proceed or not. As part of that the Police have to make as strong a case as possible. The officers research in this instance destroyed the pervs defence and made the case for prosecution stronger.

Wouldnt you agree that this officer was diligent and did a very good job ?

No, YOU seem to be missing the point, Tammy.

The officer phoned a charity to find out if it was the norm for Iraqi men to have relationships with children as he didn’t want to be ‘culturally insensitive’ FFS.

This is the U.K. - it is not OK for a man of whatever origin or belief to have a relationship of that nature with a child, and it is of no relevance to the officer wether the suspected paedo BELIEVES otherwise or not.

BTW, most paedos think there’s nothing wrong with their perversion either, and that is irrelevant too.

Do police officers treat white British paedos with kid gloves for fear of offending them since they believe there is nothing wrong with their proclivities? NO. And that’s how it should be REGARDLESS OF WHO THE PERP IS.

Our behaviour and attitudes should not change because the man allegedly believes it’s all fine for WHATEVER REASON,- yet the police officer was more concerned about cultural sensitivity than anything else.

This is the attitude that led to the disgusting abuse of thousands of young girls all across the nation. But I’m not at all surprised you are OK with it, as you’ve done nothing but obfuscate and make excuses since Rotherham was exposed, and you’ve never even expressed sympathy for the children raped.

The officer SHOULD NOT have had to phone anyone to check if it was a cultural norm for a grown man to be with a child in this way as it is irrelevant and not something a police officer - of all people - should be concerned about on the basis of perhaps hurting the suspected paedophiles feewings!

Wether the officer treated the man with extra sensitivity or not is also totally irrelevant to whether the CPS believes they can pursue a prosecution or not, you creepy tard, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY the charity pointed out the obvious when it advised “deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator”.

Sigh .

Maybe if you had read the story you would have understood that the Officer had arrested the Perv and was doing some checks which ensured that the perv will get a longer sentence.
Those of us who want to see kids protected applaud that.
Those of you who just want to hang muslims are so blinded by hatred that you will never get it.
Just to repeat - the officer had already arrested the perv. Its not difficult hun.

I know he had arrested the perv, you twat. But proceeding to contact a charity to confirm that it is culturally OK for them to rape little girls is NOT going to help the CPS prosecute him nor would it ensure he gets a longer sentence -as you well know.

In fact, such arguments have been used throughout European courts to effect the opposite outcome, as you also well know, which is why you approve of the authorities looking for ‘mitigating’ circumstances.

Who exactly do you think you are kidding with your taqyyia, Tammy?

So after arresting the perv he then looks for a way to let him off ?
What planet are you on ?
Whatever the culture is where this guy comes from doesnt mitigate what he has done here. But it may affect the sentencin once he is convicted. The officer, the arresting officer, has ticked that off the list.
It astounds me that you characters idolise Lennon and yet are so keen to attack a police officer who has removed a paedo from the streets.
Why does the right claim to love the police when they so plainly do not ?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Oh look at all the liberals defending pedophiles and then will later claim no one is defending it.

Over and over again they defend the utterly filthy paedos and express absolutley no outrage-or even sympathy for the kids. It’s absolutley sickening.

It wasn't anybody in this thread, but in reaction to the Rotherham rapes, a poster blamed the children, claimed the men were just "tapping" the girls, and said it was all consensual

The management of usmessageboard supported and defended such a statement.

Political correctness should be diagnosed as a mental disorder.

 

[Tilly]

Lol. If the policeman was actually doing his job instead of being worried about being ‘culturally insensitive’ he would have arrested the paedo without having to phone a charity.
That you think this is OK is not surprising though, as you also don’t seem to have a problem with the authorities turning a blind eye to the muslim paedo gangs operating with impugnity.

Do you think the PC would have phoned a charity if the paedo was a white English Male???

It is precisely this PC crap that has resulted in thousands upon thousands of British children being drugged, trafficked, beaten, prostituted and gang raped by the muslim paedo filth gangs for the last four decades.

If you actually read the story you will see that the officer had already arrested the suspect.

Which kind of invalidates the rest of your rant.

But I will point out the following to you.

If a case is going to court the police have to present a file to the CPS who then make a decision on whether to proceed or not. As part of that the Police have to make as strong a case as possible. The officers research in this instance destroyed the pervs defence and made the case for prosecution stronger.

Wouldnt you agree that this officer was diligent and did a very good job ?

No, YOU seem to be missing the point, Tammy.

The officer phoned a charity to find out if it was the norm for Iraqi men to have relationships with children as he didn’t want to be ‘culturally insensitive’ FFS.

This is the U.K. - it is not OK for a man of whatever origin or belief to have a relationship of that nature with a child, and it is of no relevance to the officer wether the suspected paedo BELIEVES otherwise or not.

BTW, most paedos think there’s nothing wrong with their perversion either, and that is irrelevant too.

Do police officers treat white British paedos with kid gloves for fear of offending them since they believe there is nothing wrong with their proclivities? NO. And that’s how it should be REGARDLESS OF WHO THE PERP IS.

Our behaviour and attitudes should not change because the man allegedly believes it’s all fine for WHATEVER REASON,- yet the police officer was more concerned about cultural sensitivity than anything else.

This is the attitude that led to the disgusting abuse of thousands of young girls all across the nation. But I’m not at all surprised you are OK with it, as you’ve done nothing but obfuscate and make excuses since Rotherham was exposed, and you’ve never even expressed sympathy for the children raped.

The officer SHOULD NOT have had to phone anyone to check if it was a cultural norm for a grown man to be with a child in this way as it is irrelevant and not something a police officer - of all people - should be concerned about on the basis of perhaps hurting the suspected paedophiles feewings!

Wether the officer treated the man with extra sensitivity or not is also totally irrelevant to whether the CPS believes they can pursue a prosecution or not, you creepy tard, WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY the charity pointed out the obvious when it advised “deal with the Iraqi in the same way they would deal with any other suspected child sex predator”.

Sigh .

Maybe if you had read the story you would have understood that the Officer had arrested the Perv and was doing some checks which ensured that the perv will get a longer sentence.
Those of us who want to see kids protected applaud that.
Those of you who just want to hang muslims are so blinded by hatred that you will never get it.
Just to repeat - the officer had already arrested the perv. Its not difficult hun.

I know he had arrested the perv, you twat. But proceeding to contact a charity to confirm that it is culturally OK for them to rape little girls is NOT going to help the CPS prosecute him nor would it ensure he gets a longer sentence -as you well know.

In fact, such arguments have been used throughout European courts to effect the opposite outcome, as you also well know, which is why you approve of the authorities looking for ‘mitigating’ circumstances.

Who exactly do you think you are kidding with your taqyyia, Tammy?

So after arresting the perv he then looks for a way to let him off ?
What planet are you on ?
Whatever the culture is where this guy comes from doesnt mitigate what he has done here. But it may affect the sentencin once he is convicted. The officer, the arresting officer, has ticked that off the list.
It astounds me that you characters idolise Lennon and yet are so keen to attack a police officer who has removed a paedo from the streets.
Why does the right claim to love the police when they so plainly do not ?

Quit with the taqiyya, Tammy, or show where in this case it is stated that the info was gathered with the intent of securing and extending a sentence, or better still find us a case where illustrating that paedophillia is a cultural norm has resulted in a longer sentence for the perp.

We both know the opposite is true, which is why you support the officer gathering info that is and has been successfully used in European courts as a mitigating factor. You are embarrassing yourself so I suggest you put up or shut up.