Brewer has fund to defend SB 1070

Discussion in 'Immigration/Illegal Immigration' started by Angelhair, May 27, 2010.

  1. Angelhair
    Offline

    Angelhair Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,597
    Thanks Received:
    150
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +153
    PHOENIX - With pollsters finding most Arizona voters back SB 1070, Gov. Jan Brewer is offering those folks a chance to let their wallets speak for them.

    The new immigration enforcement law is under siege, facing at least five federal lawsuits. So Brewer has started a legal defense fund to pay a private lawyer, given what her spokesman described as Attorney General Terry Goddard's half-hearted commitment to defend the bill and his refusal to defend Brewer, who is named in the lawsuits, at all.

    On Wednesday Brewer issued an executive order establishing a special defense fund to accept private donations to pay the legal costs in fighting challenges to SB 1070.

    Gubernatorial press aide Paul Senseman said the idea has been percolating for several weeks, since the state began getting unsolicited checks from individuals who want Arizona to win the legal dispute playing out in federal court.

    The tally so far, he said, is about $10,000 from close to 300 individuals from more than 40 states.

    There is no single large donor, he said. Although some are $250, "They are averaging fairly small size, some as small as $20, $10."

    The timing comes just days after Goddard said that while his office will fight the lawsuits, it will not defend Brewer.

    On Tuesday Brewer hired John Bouma, chairman of the Phoenix law firm of Snell & Wilmer, to represent her in federal court, after Goddard declined to represent her, Senseman said.

    Goddard - the lone Demo-crat running for governor, with a good chance he will face Republican Brewer in the November general election - acknowledged turning the governor down.

    "I am counsel for the state, I am counsel for almost all the state boards and commissions," he said. "But I am not counsel for the governor by law."

    Anyway, Goddard pointed out two of the five lawsuits name both Brewer and him as individual defendants.

    "In order to avoid any possibility that we might have divergent opinions about how best to enter a defense, it was probably best to start with separate counsel," Goddard said. "So it wasn't a rejection."

    Senseman said Brewer is just as happy not to have Goddard representing her.

    "Given his various statements that have, at times, favored the legislation and at other times opposed it, the governor's much more confident that she will provide the most vigorous defense available," he said.

    The key part of the law requires police to ask those they have stopped for other reasons about their immigration status if they reasonably suspect the person is an illegal immigrant. The lawsuits charge this is an illegal intrusion by the state into federal immigration policy and say the law will result in racial profiling.

    Brewer has fund to defend SB 1070
     
  2. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    48,710
    Thanks Received:
    7,230
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +20,764
    SB 1070 is the most un-American piece of legislation since the Patriot Act.

    I just hope that irrational fear of Mexicans isn't as powerful as irrational fear of terrorists.
     
  3. LilOlLady
    Offline

    LilOlLady Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,841
    Thanks Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Ratings:
    +761
    "Will" can be defeated. "May", "could", "might" lead to racial profiling is not a legal challenge.
    I could kill my neighbor because I have a gun is not a legal challenge. My neighbor is a white supremist and hate non-whites could lead to him killing me is not a legal challenge.
     

Share This Page