When I said, outsiders are needed to change Washington but not outsiders in government, I meant insiders in state and local government, outsiders in federal government. The ideal background of a presidential candidate would be an education in political science and or law, experience in local and state government, limited experience at the federal level and the military coupled with experience in the private sector and community service.I agree outsiders are needed to change Washington but not outsiders to politics and government.
Non sequitur. How can they be outsiders but still be insiders to politics and government?
When I have a problem with my car and the dealership can't solve the problem, I look for an outsider but not a plumber, businessman, or teacher but a mechanic with experience and knowledge of car repair.
Not only are you comparing apples to oranges, but just don't seem to get it! Is it really that hard? No politician comes to office experienced, nor should they or were desired by the Founders (for the third time); there is no school, what makes a successful politician is both leadership, managerial and diplomatic skills, largely born with; you either have it or not. How many presidents have we had that had tons of "experience" but were miserable failures because they lacked the leadership and management skills? So experience is not the central thing.
And someone like Donald applied it to business for many years, and is now applying it to running the nation. No one makes split-second decisions, that is why they have all these positions around them, czars, etc., to consult with, get information, guide them. Donald has far, far more going for him than the so-called "experience" that Barry had after sitting on his hands for two years in the senate. In recent weeks, over the healthcare Bill, Donald has met and made friends with every single person in the Congress. It isn't just what you know and your experience, but how quickly you learn and what you intend to do with it. All the experience in the world is of no help if your head is wrong. Whitehouse staff have already said that there was more going on in the WH during the first four days with Trump than all of Barry's 8 years! Unlike most presidents, Trump is busy every minute of every day. Every single minute. The guy never stops. The guy is probably conducting business while on the commode.
The second thing needed to change Washington is insiders. An outsider may have the general idea as to what's needs to be done but it takes insiders to do it.
Can you say Mike Pence.
Lastly, there needs to be overwhelming support for the leadership because there are both winners and losers when you make major changes. Without a strong mandate from the people, change that is lasting change is impossible.
Well, now you are venturing into pure idealism. You better be a realist if you want to run the country. You have to go with what you have rather than what would be ideal. Or maybe you'd rather have Hillary and her picks for Supreme Court, energy, jobs, foreign relations, and yes, FBI Director. She would have fired Comey too. And would probably be dealing all of the favors out right now that her many secret contributors paid for . . . .
You like so many people seem to think politics and government is so simple that no knowledge or experience is needed. If you wheeled and dealed your way to billions in real estate, then you have all you need.
The idea that because the founders did not see any reason for experience in government is just a bit ridiculous today. Things have changed. In Jefferson's day, the federal government was a relatively simple organization, much smaller than many of our businesses, 4 departments in the executive branch, 15 today, a budget of 22 billion versus 3 trillion. Anyone who wanted to see the president just dropped in and waited. Being a congressmen was a part time job. Today, the less knowledgeable and experienced a president or congressmen is the more he will be influenced by insiders because without knowledge he has to depend on them.
No one can have all the knowledge and experience they need as president but that does not mean knowing nothing is enough. Trump is a wonderful example of this. His handling of the media is a disaster because he doesn't know how to use the media to his advantage. His executive orders are blocked by the courts because he doesn't know what passes as constitutional. He insults people in his own party that he will need as president. He hires people that are not well qualified because he doesn't understand the function of job. He hires based on what he understands, loyalty, and pleasing his supporters. His dealings with Congress has yielded nothing unless you consider having his key campaign promise, the Wall blocked.
Military leaders as president rarely need much help understanding military or foreign policy. Presidents with a background in economics, need little help formulating their economic policy. Experienced leaders in congress need little help in putting together legislation and piloting a path leading to passage. Presidents with background in law have little problem understanding legislation or writing executive orders. Presidents with extensive experience in handling the media need little help here. However, when a president has none of the above, he needs help with everything or he does as Trump often does. He just guesses and wings his way through with often disastrous results.
Last edited: