Breaking. Prop 8.... struck down.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by syrenn, Feb 7, 2012.

  1. syrenn
    Offline

    syrenn BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    47,839
    Thanks Received:
    10,388
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +10,404
    I have no links yet.... but same sex marriage is a go in California again.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  2. g5000
    Offline

    g5000 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    55,976
    Thanks Received:
    9,333
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +24,525
    Yep. The federal appeals court has just ruled Proposition 8, which banned same sex marriage in California, is unconstitutional.

    I will post a link to the decision as soon as it becomes publicly available.

    This is sure to move on to the US Supreme Court.
     
  3. syrenn
    Offline

    syrenn BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    47,839
    Thanks Received:
    10,388
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +10,404
    California gay marriage ban struck down by federal appeals court - San Jose Mercury News


     
  4. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Online

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,579
    Thanks Received:
    6,677
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +17,438
    I have no problem with gay marriage, but the people of California voted not to have it in their state. If judges are just going to overturn the will of the people then why vote at all?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  5. TruthSeeker56
    Offline

    TruthSeeker56 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,899
    Thanks Received:
    482
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Ratings:
    +496
    What a SHOCK. The extremely leftist 9th Circuit Court has ruled in favor of another leftist agenda. I just can't believe it!
     
  6. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,211
    Thanks Received:
    19,811
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,287
    It will all come down to can you vote on what rights others are allowed to have
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  7. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,211
    Thanks Received:
    19,811
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,287
    Basically, people who are not homosexual and who squirm at the very idea of homosexual sex got to vote on what rights should be extended to homosexuals
     
  8. xotoxi
    Offline

    xotoxi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    30,322
    Thanks Received:
    5,203
    Trophy Points:
    1,110
    Location:
    your mother
    Ratings:
    +5,492
    I am neither gay nor do I live in California.

    So I don't really care.
     
  9. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Online

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,579
    Thanks Received:
    6,677
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +17,438
    Homosexuals didn't get to vote?
     
  10. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,513
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,922
    It will come down to "does the State have a compelling interest in legislating the activities of people in the bedroom" and the answer is yes. Unless you think Polygamy and Incest between consenting adults is ok.

    But this issue is not even about sex it is about the ability of the abnormal to marry. And the decision will also hinge on the concept of " what defines marriage". And do the States have a compelling interest in regulating the institution of Marriage. The simple answer is YES the State DOES have a compelling interest. The follow on question being does the State have a compelling interest to define what is and is not marriage. And again the answer is yes they do.


    The final decision will be nearly unanimous though, due to the political climate and the cowardice of many the Supreme Court will most likely vote 7-2 or 9-0 to agree with the 9th.
     

Share This Page