BREAKING NEWS: Whistle-blower is registered DEMOCRAT, new leak reveals - and that was basis...

[The Purge]

The unidentified whistle-blower who filed a complaint against Donald Trump is a registered Democrat, a new leak in the case has revealed.

CNN's Jake Tapper reported Thursday afternoon that voter registration records formed the basis for an inspector general's claim that the person may have had an 'arguable political bias' against the sitting Republican president.

Tapper said an attorney for the whistle-blower - whose identity remains anonymous - declined to comment on the claim. Already, the person had been revealed to a male, CIA operative, likely with a deep knowledge of Ukrainian political affairs.

The IG suggested the whistle-blower was either a Democrat or a Republican who supported one of Trump's primary campaign opponents.

A preliminary review found ‘some indica of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate.' However the intelligence community inspector general also 'complaint’s allegations nonetheless appeared credible,' the report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

------------

Yep, a setup right from the start. All those conspiring in this sedition/treason should be tried and given the sentence reserved for all traitors. Next we need to check donor records and videos of Hildebeastys rallies to see if he was one of the hundred attendees of her typical crowd.

 

[lantern2814]

And it's now coming out that Schiff and his people were meeting with this person weeks ago to set this up. This is all backfiring on the Dems. As expected. Funny how all these investigations have revealed is Democrat corruption.

 

[MarathonMike]

This reminds me of that singer show where they wear the big masks. Let's go whistleblower, off with the mask you are going to outed anyway.

 

[DustyInfinity]

And it's now coming out that Schiff and his people were meeting with this person weeks ago to set this up. This is all backfiring on the Dems. As expected. Funny how all these investigations have revealed is Democrat corruption.

It really is as bad as Smollet in Chicago. Worst attack ever.

 

[Skylar]

The unidentified whistle-blower who filed a complaint against Donald Trump is a registered Democrat, a new leak in the case has revealed.

CNN's Jake Tapper reported Thursday afternoon that voter registration records formed the basis for an inspector general's claim that the person may have had an 'arguable political bias' against the sitting Republican president.

Tapper said an attorney for the whistle-blower - whose identity remains anonymous - declined to comment on the claim. Already, the person had been revealed to a male, CIA operative, likely with a deep knowledge of Ukrainian political affairs.

The IG suggested the whistle-blower was either a Democrat or a Republican who supported one of Trump's primary campaign opponents.

A preliminary review found ‘some indica of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate.' However the intelligence community inspector general also 'complaint’s allegations nonetheless appeared credible,' the report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

------------

Yep, a setup right from the start. All those conspiring in this sedition/treason should be tried and given the sentence reserved for all traitors. Next we need to check donor records and videos of Hildebeastys rallies to see if he was one of the hundred attendees of her typical crowd.

And? Remember, the Intel IG found the claims of the whistleblower to be credible.

 

[The Purge]

The unidentified whistle-blower who filed a complaint against Donald Trump is a registered Democrat, a new leak in the case has revealed.

CNN's Jake Tapper reported Thursday afternoon that voter registration records formed the basis for an inspector general's claim that the person may have had an 'arguable political bias' against the sitting Republican president.

Tapper said an attorney for the whistle-blower - whose identity remains anonymous - declined to comment on the claim. Already, the person had been revealed to a male, CIA operative, likely with a deep knowledge of Ukrainian political affairs.

The IG suggested the whistle-blower was either a Democrat or a Republican who supported one of Trump's primary campaign opponents.

A preliminary review found ‘some indica of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate.' However the intelligence community inspector general also 'complaint’s allegations nonetheless appeared credible,' the report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

------------

Yep, a setup right from the start. All those conspiring in this sedition/treason should be tried and given the sentence reserved for all traitors. Next we need to check donor records and videos of Hildebeastys rallies to see if he was one of the hundred attendees of her typical crowd.

And? Remember, the Intel IG found the claims of the whistleblower to be credible.

Isnt he also a DemonRAT?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Whistle-blower is registered DEMOCRAT


Oh god not Cindy again.

 

[Skylar]

And it's now coming out that Schiff and his people were meeting with this person weeks ago to set this up. This is all backfiring on the Dems. As expected. Funny how all these investigations have revealed is Democrat corruption.

It really is as bad as Smollet in Chicago. Worst attack ever.

Save of course that the call outlined in the Whistleblowers complaint has been verified to exist, includes the numerous citations of Biden or his son, exactly as the whistleblower described.

With Trump holding up funding for the Ukraine, exactly as the whistleblower described

And Trump instructed the President of Ukraine to talk to Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Gulliani exactly as the whistleblower described

Trump also tried to include William Barr, exactly as the whistleblower described

The Ukrainian's did summarize the phone call as follows:

"Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States."

.....exactly as the whistle blower described.

Trump discussed no other corruption cases the 2016 election and Biden were discussed in the call, exactly as the whistleblower described

State department officials listened in on the call, exactly as the whistleblower described

The transcripts of the call were moved to secure severs, designed to handle classified information of an especially sensitive nature exactly as the whistleblower described

Notice a pattern yet? In fact, to save time, here's the whistleblower complaint. Show us what the Whistleblower got wrong.

Read the unclassified version of the whistleblower complaint against Trump

As we'll be here all night if we list what was accurate in the Whistleblower complaint

 

[RealDave]

But the whistleblower had the conversation right. Everything in his report has been shown to be true.
I

 

[Skylar]

But the whistleblower had the conversation right. Everything in his report has been shown to be true.
I

Yeah, I'm still waiting for anyone to point out a detail that the whistleblower got wrong.

For example, the whistleblower said that Rudy met with Zelensky's chief of staff. But Rudy won't answer if he actually met with Zelensky's chief of staff or not. He avoids the question like it was on fire.

 

[DGS49]

Are you people really this stupid or what?

There is no question about WHAT WAS SAID in the telephone call in question.

There was no quid pro quo. There was no indication whatsoever of any connection between the delaying of funds and the investigation into Bidens' corruption. In fact, the Ukrainians DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THE FUNDS WERE DELAYED until several weeks AFTER the call. And of course the funds were presently released. Is that how extortion works, exactly? YOU DON'T TELL THE PERSON WHAT THE DOWNSIDE IS? Fucking ridiculous.

If Biden weren't running for President, would there be any question about the propriety of inquiring about WHAT DEFINITELY APPEARS TO BE family members cashing in on the VP's position? No. So Biden't campaign is the difference between a legitimate request and an ILLEGAL ACT.

Stupid idiots.

Go the fuck forward with the Impeachment. You will look even MORE idiotic and shallow than you do now. If that's even possible.

 

[DustyInfinity]

Don't look at what was said in the actual call, it is inconvenient right.

 

[Skylar]

Are you people really this stupid or what?

There is no question about WHAT WAS SAID in the telephone call in question.

There was no quid pro quo. There was no indication whatsoever of any connection between the delaying of funds and the investigation into Bidens' corruption. In fact, the Ukrainians DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THE FUNDS WERE DELAYED until several weeks AFTER the call. And of course the funds were presently released. Is that how extortion works, exactly? YOU DON'T TELL THE PERSON WHAT THE DOWNSIDE IS? Fucking ridiculous.

If Biden weren't running for President, would there be any question about the propriety of inquiring about WHAT DEFINITELY APPEARS TO BE family members cashing in on the VP's position? No. So Biden't campaign is the difference between a legitimate request and an ILLEGAL ACT.

Stupid idiots.

Go the fuck forward with the Impeachment. You will look even MORE idiotic and shallow than you do now. If that's even possible.

Yeah, we can read the transcripts. And they bury Trump:

President Zelinksy:....We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost. ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.
President Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though.....

Trump explicitly connects further aid to the Ukraine with his 'favor'; the corruption investigations into Crowdstrike and Joe Biden.

And of couse, the Ukrainians were made to understand that the US cooperation was being held back until the 'corruption investigations' into Biden and Crowdstrike were complete. This is the Ukrainian summary of the call BEFORE the whistleblower complaint became known.

"Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine’s image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between the Ukraine and the United States."

There were only two 'corruption cases' mentioned in the entire call: Crowdstrike once. And Joe Biden and son, 3 times.

With Trump *personally* holding back aid to Ukraine before the call with the Ukrainian president to ask him for a favor.

And of course, if this was an official request.....why did he ask the Zelensky to work with his personal lawyers and send Rudy with an off the books legal team? Why not go through official channels?

 

[theHawk]

Of course it was a deep state operative of the Hussein regime.

 

[DustyInfinity]

Are you people really this stupid or what?

There is no question about WHAT WAS SAID in the telephone call in question.

There was no quid pro quo. There was no indication whatsoever of any connection between the delaying of funds and the investigation into Bidens' corruption. In fact, the Ukrainians DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THE FUNDS WERE DELAYED until several weeks AFTER the call. And of course the funds were presently released. Is that how extortion works, exactly? YOU DON'T TELL THE PERSON WHAT THE DOWNSIDE IS? Fucking ridiculous.

If Biden weren't running for President, would there be any question about the propriety of inquiring about WHAT DEFINITELY APPEARS TO BE family members cashing in on the VP's position? No. So Biden't campaign is the difference between a legitimate request and an ILLEGAL ACT.

Stupid idiots.

Go the fuck forward with the Impeachment. You will look even MORE idiotic and shallow than you do now. If that's even possible.

Yeah, we can read the transcripts. And they bury Trump:

President Zelinksy:....We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost. ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.
President Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though.....

Trump explicitly connects further aid to the Ukraine with his 'favor'; the corruption investigations into Crowdstrike and Joe Biden.

And of couse, the Ukrainians were made to understand that the US cooperation was being held back until the 'corruption investigations' into Biden and Crowdstrike were complete. This is the Ukrainian summary of the call BEFORE the whistleblower complaint became known.

"Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine’s image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between the Ukraine and the United States."

There were only two 'corruption cases' mentioned in the entire call: Crowdstrike once. And Joe Biden and son, 3 times.

With Trump *personally* holding back aid to Ukraine before the call with the Ukrainian president to ask him for a favor.

And of course, if this was an official request.....why did he ask the Zelensky to work with his personal lawyers and send Rudy with an off the books legal team? Why not go through official channels?

Here is a few things your media is not telling you. Mainly, Zelensky had no idea that any military aid was being delayed. How do you threaten somebody who doesn't even know about any funding delays? I understand bias is difficult to control, but it is obvious that Trump is not threatening to withhold Javelins. They were separate subjects.

Is looking into corruption interfering in an election? Is it not possible question any of the Biden's past dealings?

 

[pyetro]

The unidentified whistle-blower who filed a complaint against Donald Trump is a registered Democrat, a new leak in the case has revealed.

CNN's Jake Tapper reported Thursday afternoon that voter registration records formed the basis for an inspector general's claim that the person may have had an 'arguable political bias' against the sitting Republican president.

Tapper said an attorney for the whistle-blower - whose identity remains anonymous - declined to comment on the claim. Already, the person had been revealed to a male, CIA operative, likely with a deep knowledge of Ukrainian political affairs.

The IG suggested the whistle-blower was either a Democrat or a Republican who supported one of Trump's primary campaign opponents.

A preliminary review found ‘some indica of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate.' However the intelligence community inspector general also 'complaint’s allegations nonetheless appeared credible,' the report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

------------

Yep, a setup right from the start. All those conspiring in this sedition/treason should be tried and given the sentence reserved for all traitors. Next we need to check donor records and videos of Hildebeastys rallies to see if he was one of the hundred attendees of her typical crowd.

Fake news.

 

[The Purge]

But the whistleblower had the conversation right. Everything in his report has been shown to be true.
I

7 or 8 times!!!!! ROTFLMFAO@!!!

 

[The Purge]

The unidentified whistle-blower who filed a complaint against Donald Trump is a registered Democrat, a new leak in the case has revealed.

CNN's Jake Tapper reported Thursday afternoon that voter registration records formed the basis for an inspector general's claim that the person may have had an 'arguable political bias' against the sitting Republican president.

Tapper said an attorney for the whistle-blower - whose identity remains anonymous - declined to comment on the claim. Already, the person had been revealed to a male, CIA operative, likely with a deep knowledge of Ukrainian political affairs.

The IG suggested the whistle-blower was either a Democrat or a Republican who supported one of Trump's primary campaign opponents.

A preliminary review found ‘some indica of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate.' However the intelligence community inspector general also 'complaint’s allegations nonetheless appeared credible,' the report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

------------

Yep, a setup right from the start. All those conspiring in this sedition/treason should be tried and given the sentence reserved for all traitors. Next we need to check donor records and videos of Hildebeastys rallies to see if he was one of the hundred attendees of her typical crowd.

Fake news.

FAKE HUMAN^^^^^

 

[RealDave]

Are you people really this stupid or what?

There is no question about WHAT WAS SAID in the telephone call in question.

There was no quid pro quo. There was no indication whatsoever of any connection between the delaying of funds and the investigation into Bidens' corruption. In fact, the Ukrainians DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THE FUNDS WERE DELAYED until several weeks AFTER the call. And of course the funds were presently released. Is that how extortion works, exactly? YOU DON'T TELL THE PERSON WHAT THE DOWNSIDE IS? Fucking ridiculous.

If Biden weren't running for President, would there be any question about the propriety of inquiring about WHAT DEFINITELY APPEARS TO BE family members cashing in on the VP's position? No. So Biden't campaign is the difference between a legitimate request and an ILLEGAL ACT.

Stupid idiots.

Go the fuck forward with the Impeachment. You will look even MORE idiotic and shallow than you do now. If that's even possible.

Yeah, we can read the transcripts. And they bury Trump:

President Zelinksy:....We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost. ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.
President Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though.....

Trump explicitly connects further aid to the Ukraine with his 'favor'; the corruption investigations into Crowdstrike and Joe Biden.

And of couse, the Ukrainians were made to understand that the US cooperation was being held back until the 'corruption investigations' into Biden and Crowdstrike were complete. This is the Ukrainian summary of the call BEFORE the whistleblower complaint became known.

"Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine’s image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between the Ukraine and the United States."

There were only two 'corruption cases' mentioned in the entire call: Crowdstrike once. And Joe Biden and son, 3 times.

With Trump *personally* holding back aid to Ukraine before the call with the Ukrainian president to ask him for a favor.

And of course, if this was an official request.....why did he ask the Zelensky to work with his personal lawyers and send Rudy with an off the books legal team? Why not go through official channels?

Here is a few things your media is not telling you. Mainly, Zelensky had no idea that any military aid was being delayed. How do you threaten somebody who doesn't even know about any funding delays? I understand bias is difficult to control, but it is obvious that Trump is not threatening to withhold Javelins. They were separate subjects.

Is looking into corruption interfering in an election? Is it not possible question any of the Biden's past dealings?

Yesterdays testimony has texts proving it was being withheld based on Ukraine's investigating. And we know Ukraine as beung told to do it or no phone call with Trump.

Trump is dead meat. All that is left is adding to the list of who goes with him : Guiliani, Barr, Pompeo, Pence so far

 

[Billiejeens]

And it's now coming out that Schiff and his people were meeting with this person weeks ago to set this up. This is all backfiring on the Dems. As expected. Funny how all these investigations have revealed is Democrat corruption.

It really is as bad as Smollet in Chicago. Worst attack ever.

Save of course that the call outlined in the Whistleblowers complaint has been verified to exist, includes the numerous citations of Biden or his son, exactly as the whistleblower described.

With Trump holding up funding for the Ukraine, exactly as the whistleblower described

And Trump instructed the President of Ukraine to talk to Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Gulliani exactly as the whistleblower described

Trump also tried to include William Barr, exactly as the whistleblower described

The Ukrainian's did summarize the phone call as follows:

"Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States."

.....exactly as the whistle blower described.

Trump discussed no other corruption cases the 2016 election and Biden were discussed in the call, exactly as the whistleblower described

State department officials listened in on the call, exactly as the whistleblower described

The transcripts of the call were moved to secure severs, designed to handle classified information of an especially sensitive nature exactly as the whistleblower described

Notice a pattern yet? In fact, to save time, here's the whistleblower complaint. Show us what the Whistleblower got wrong.

Read the unclassified version of the whistleblower complaint against Trump

As we'll be here all night if we list what was accurate in the Whistleblower complaint

Literally every sentence of that nonsense is false.