BREAKING: Jewish students at NY college locked in library as Pali supporters pound on doors

He is Pakistani and not a real Canadian. He likes to vomit foth his bile CLAIMING he is representing all of Canada, but his value system comes from an Islamic hell hole.

Canadians love Islamic nutjobs, especially for cheap farm labor. Mexicans and other latinos just used Canada as way to get into the U.S., so they import slugs from Muslim shitholes, especially if they speak French.

It isn't called The Great White North because of the snow.
 
Last edited:
We are witnessing the historical course of the process of international delegitimization of the state of Israel unfolding before our eyes.
I agree but I also think that the media that is driving this hate, should be held fully accountable for instances like this - especially if students are harmed. The global Jew haters have convinced themselves Israel can be destroyed and Jews pushed off the land. Boy, do they have a nasty shock coming.
 
Some of the Jewish kids were protesting with hamas lol
I guess maybe they think that when the pogroms come to America, they'll be safe. It amazes me that such a huge majority of Jews in America vote for the party that created these violent nut cases. I'm sorry, but if I was in control, not a single Jew who voted mindlessly for Democrats for decades, would be allowed to make Aliyah. If they agree with those who hate Israel, here, they'll work to destroy it THERE.
 
Our DC Snowplow brigades are now offering escorting services. We are helping two bar mitzvahs and a wedding this weekend.
 
I guess maybe they think that when the pogroms come to America, they'll be safe. It amazes me that such a huge majority of Jews in America vote for the party that created these violent nut cases. I'm sorry, but if I was in control, not a single Jew who voted mindlessly for Democrats for decades, would be allowed to make Aliyah. If they agree with those who hate Israel, here, they'll work to destroy it THERE.

Most of American JEWS are far more committed to their Marxist ideology and have little concern about ISR
 

Jewish Review: You've said that for the religious right, and I suppose you are also speaking, for example,about the Gush Emunim in Israel, that gentiles are seen as largely a means whereby God punishes, tests or protects the Jews. The gentile's personal destiny is not only secondary to ours, but in some sense, part of our own destiny. Is this a philosophy that is clearly articulated?


Rabbi Schiller: Yes, definitely.Any standard Yeshivah or Chasidische place, or your West Bank Zionists would all say that quite clearly.


Jewish Review: Yet you also argue that Jewish commitments on the left are an extension of a philosophy which places little or no value on the gentile, and are actually self serving commitments. How is this so?


Rabbi Schiller: Not always, just sometimes. Take, for example, Jewish involvement in the civil rights movements.Ask a Jew why he was in favor of civil rights and very often he'll come up with something like the following rationale: ?We could be next!? In fact recently there was a press report on Le Pen's movement in France which reported that French Jews are opposing Le Pen because they are afraid that after the Arabs they'll be next. Now this feeling is often subconscious and I'm not saying that there weren't also many Jews who were idealistic about their politics, but the question is did the Jew really feel that a white Protestant southerner should have an integrated society? Or did the Jew really feel that for our own political agenda their ought to be an integrated society. Would the Jews have wanted integration with the blacks if the southern whites were Jewish Orthodox?


Jewish Review: Perhaps the liberal Jews were sincere?


Rabbi Schiller: Many were, and the insincerity of others was largely subconscious. But as far as liberal Jews are concerned I think that we're seeing a split on that issue today. The sincere liberals are continuing on with Tikkun and things like that, but those who were full of baloney now support Commentary and Public Interest. Let's take the Tikkun people. Are they really serious? I can't believe that they really want the demographic/racial extinction of European man. Demographic trends seem to show that within the next century America will essentially be a third world nation. Does the Jewish liberal really welcome that? I think they may say they welcome that because they live in suburbia. Do they really believe that all nations, peoples and cultures should be obliterated in an egalitarian world? I don't know what they want. They're stuck because they took the notions of democracy and human rights so seriously.

Jewish Review: Do you feel that we as Orthodox Jews cannot take such notions seriously in this country?


Rabbi Schiller: The only way you can take these ideas seriously is something along the lines of a certain segment of Orthodox Catholic thinking that has evolved since Vatican II, and the ?Declaration on Religious Liberty?. John Paul II was a good illustration of this kind of thinking. I'm talking about John Courtney Murray's famous book We Hold These Truths and the National Review‑type Catholic. Somehow they feel that God gave man dignity and that dignity means that he must have the rights of the French Revolution. Now, of course, Catholic traditionalists have opposed this, but I think this is the only way we can put liberalism and traditional religion together: The dignity of man entitles him to certain rights and even if these rights subvert the Orthodoxy of others they must somehow be respected. It's an ?iffy? proposition.


Jewish Review: Even if these rights subvert Jewish Orthodoxy?


Rabbi Schiller: That's the only way you could possibly do it. You'd have to say that the freedom of speech, the freedom of assembly, etc. are so intrinsically linked to the dignity of man that no coercive force should ever be allowed to interfere with them in anyway. I think many Modern Orthodox Jewish thinkers who don't think too critically, would say something like this: that the Bill of Rights is one of the greatest things on the earth. If you asked a Rabbi Rackman or a Sol Roth about what their metaphysical (or theological) underpinning for their view on this is I don't know what they would say. It's rather nice. It's a friendly sort of thing. But can you really defend it in the end? I've studied at great length this controversy in the Catholic church for the past 25 years.I've been obsessed with it and I think the anti‑Vatican II traditionalists are on very sound ground on this ?freedom? question. They're the ones who can maintain a consistency in their Catholic faith (and I'm afraid it seems true in a Jewish context as well). But I must say that I am far more concerned with uncovering the tension between liberal democratic thought and Orthodox religion than I am in resolving it.


Jewish Review: It may be that this is one of the antinomies that we have in this life that we simply can't resolve?

Rabbi Schiller: The problem is this. If the Jew understood this contradiction would he then have the chutzpah to continue to do what he does in Western society? Maybe it's better that he doesn't grasp it because than he would lose his easy assent to these things and feel less at home in gentile society. If the assumption is correct that these rights are what protect us from the wrath of the goyim then maybe it's better that we continue to fool ourselves; for to be consciously manipulative (in backing liberal causes for selfish reasons) would be far harder than to be subconsciously manipulative (consciously thinking you are backing these causes from pure motives), which is the way the Jew operates now.
 
Most of American JEWS are far more committed to their Marxist ideology and have little concern about ISR

Reformed Jews outnumber Conservative Jews about 2 to 1 in the U.S., almost the same for atheist and non-denominational versus Conservative. Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox are a much smaller percentage here than in Israel. Not sure about Europe's make up.
 

Jewish Review: You've said that for the religious right, and I suppose you are also speaking, for example,about the Gush Emunim in Israel, that gentiles are seen as largely a means whereby God punishes, tests or protects the Jews. The gentile's personal destiny is not only secondary to ours, but in some sense, part of our own destiny. Is this a philosophy that is clearly articulated?


Rabbi Schiller: Yes, definitely.Any standard Yeshivah or Chasidische place, or your West Bank Zionists would all say that quite clearly.


Jewish Review: Yet you also argue that Jewish commitments on the left are an extension of a philosophy which places little or no value on the gentile, and are actually self serving commitments. How is this so?


Rabbi Schiller: Not always, just sometimes. Take, for example, Jewish involvement in the civil rights movements.Ask a Jew why he was in favor of civil rights and very often he'll come up with something like the following rationale: ?We could be next!? In fact recently there was a press report on Le Pen's movement in France which reported that French Jews are opposing Le Pen because they are afraid that after the Arabs they'll be next. Now this feeling is often subconscious and I'm not saying that there weren't also many Jews who were idealistic about their politics, but the question is did the Jew really feel that a white Protestant southerner should have an integrated society? Or did the Jew really feel that for our own political agenda their ought to be an integrated society. Would the Jews have wanted integration with the blacks if the southern whites were Jewish Orthodox?


Jewish Review: Perhaps the liberal Jews were sincere?


Rabbi Schiller: Many were, and the insincerity of others was largely subconscious. But as far as liberal Jews are concerned I think that we're seeing a split on that issue today. The sincere liberals are continuing on with Tikkun and things like that, but those who were full of baloney now support Commentary and Public Interest. Let's take the Tikkun people. Are they really serious? I can't believe that they really want the demographic/racial extinction of European man. Demographic trends seem to show that within the next century America will essentially be a third world nation. Does the Jewish liberal really welcome that? I think they may say they welcome that because they live in suburbia. Do they really believe that all nations, peoples and cultures should be obliterated in an egalitarian world? I don't know what they want. They're stuck because they took the notions of democracy and human rights so seriously.

Jewish Review: Do you feel that we as Orthodox Jews cannot take such notions seriously in this country?


Rabbi Schiller: The only way you can take these ideas seriously is something along the lines of a certain segment of Orthodox Catholic thinking that has evolved since Vatican II, and the ?Declaration on Religious Liberty?. John Paul II was a good illustration of this kind of thinking. I'm talking about John Courtney Murray's famous book We Hold These Truths and the National Review‑type Catholic. Somehow they feel that God gave man dignity and that dignity means that he must have the rights of the French Revolution. Now, of course, Catholic traditionalists have opposed this, but I think this is the only way we can put liberalism and traditional religion together: The dignity of man entitles him to certain rights and even if these rights subvert the Orthodoxy of others they must somehow be respected. It's an ?iffy? proposition.


Jewish Review: Even if these rights subvert Jewish Orthodoxy?


Rabbi Schiller: That's the only way you could possibly do it. You'd have to say that the freedom of speech, the freedom of assembly, etc. are so intrinsically linked to the dignity of man that no coercive force should ever be allowed to interfere with them in anyway. I think many Modern Orthodox Jewish thinkers who don't think too critically, would say something like this: that the Bill of Rights is one of the greatest things on the earth. If you asked a Rabbi Rackman or a Sol Roth about what their metaphysical (or theological) underpinning for their view on this is I don't know what they would say. It's rather nice. It's a friendly sort of thing. But can you really defend it in the end? I've studied at great length this controversy in the Catholic church for the past 25 years.I've been obsessed with it and I think the anti‑Vatican II traditionalists are on very sound ground on this ?freedom? question. They're the ones who can maintain a consistency in their Catholic faith (and I'm afraid it seems true in a Jewish context as well). But I must say that I am far more concerned with uncovering the tension between liberal democratic thought and Orthodox religion than I am in resolving it.


Jewish Review: It may be that this is one of the antinomies that we have in this life that we simply can't resolve?

Rabbi Schiller: The problem is this. If the Jew understood this contradiction would he then have the chutzpah to continue to do what he does in Western society? Maybe it's better that he doesn't grasp it because than he would lose his easy assent to these things and feel less at home in gentile society. If the assumption is correct that these rights are what protect us from the wrath of the goyim then maybe it's better that we continue to fool ourselves; for to be consciously manipulative (in backing liberal causes for selfish reasons) would be far harder than to be subconsciously manipulative (consciously thinking you are backing these causes from pure motives), which is the way the Jew operates now.
What I got from that is that even the Jews know you cuck whites are allowing yourselves to be replaced. 😄
 



"They need room to destroy".

Campus cops, even if they meant well, know who has power and what side the administration will take.

Sucks for the jewish students and any campus cops who'd like to do the right thing. That lynch mob took years of indoctrination to form, and isn't going away for a while.

Cooper union is famous it was started if I remember correctly in the 1850s ...

I'm sure it's completely corrupted by leftardedness


They were ahead of thier time race, creed, color ,male ,female ,,,,nothing mattered ...the only thing that mattered was performance and the pursuit of excellence
 
There are no phobias about Hamas or Islam
There are fact recognitions and identifications that lib loons and terrorists don’t want. So they label “phobes”
 
Does this mean that many Americans are turning sour on Zionists? If so then imagine what the rest of the world is thinking!
If America turns it's back on Israel, then it will definitely show the decline America is going through, and this is all due to the inward struggles that are going on in order to gain back control from the deplorable Democrat's who are responsible for the serious decline in America these days.
 

Forum List

Back
Top