BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault

[WaitingFor2020]

Another hole in an accuser's story. This is getting predictable.

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION!

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION! An attorney for GOP Alabama Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore revealed Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelson lied when she said no contact had been made between the Judge and herself following the alleged sexual advancement in 1977.​

Very telling her stepson calls her a liar.

Oh, like stepchildren are always on the side of their stepmothers.
Goddamn, if it wasn't for spin you guys would have nothing at all.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Wow. Imagine being assigned a pedophile Judge that raped you as a child. Disgusting.

If she found it disgusting she could have requested another Judge. She didn't.

Maybe she did. You act like you've got all the facts and the fact is you ain't got shit except your opinion.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

...They cannot kick him out because of something he did 40 years before he was ever in the Senate...

Sure they can.

...You need to learn that rules do apply. Most libs think they don't!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

The ever liberal LA Times disagrees that no one will expel him because he did not violate Senate rules and was not facing a criminal charge.

Mitch McConnel's opinion counts within the walls of the Senate chambers just a wee bit more than your grasping-at-straws LA Times reference.

Really? Most of the Republicans in the Senate are calling for his head on a plate!

Bingo... so is McConnel... who promised, this very day, to haul him in front of the Senate Ethics Committee, very shortly after being sworn in.

McConnell is working very hard to get fired as majority leader. He know he stands no chance of getting reelected the next time as his primary challenger is now the governor. He is hanging on by his fingernails.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Wow. Imagine being assigned a pedophile Judge that raped you as a child. Disgusting.

Imagine not mentioning a huge conflict of interest with a judge deciding on your divorce

95% of divorces don't go to trial. Even if its true that her divorce was assigned to him, it's unlikely that they would have had any "contact".

Have you ever been divorced in Alabama?

Have you? Do all parties to a divorce action have to show up in court before they can proceed with filing their complaints and settlement requests? Do tell us Rocky, how they do it in Alabamy.

 

[paperview]

"Roy Moore signed an order in a divorce case involving Beverly Young Nelson in 1999, documents show, but they do not reflect whether Moore ever saw her in court during the proceeding.

Court records show Beverly Harris sought a divorce from Ervine Lee Harris III on May 25, 1999. The couple had three children, and District Judge W.D. Russell scheduled a child custody hearing for June 16, 1999.

The judge later delayed the hearing at the request of the woman. The next month, Moore signed an order dismissing the divorce case at the woman’s request; records do not indicate Moore or any other judge ever held a hearing where the woman might have seen Moore."

The Latest: Questions remain about Moore, accuser in court

 

[paperview]

Maybe bripattiecakes will go back to discussing length of phone cords in 1977.

 

[bripat9643]

Another hole in an accuser's story. This is getting predictable.

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION!

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION! An attorney for GOP Alabama Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore revealed Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelson lied when she said no contact had been made between the Judge and herself following the alleged sexual advancement in 1977.​

Sorry, but this doesn't mean jack.
1. When you're involved in any kind of civil action, you don't get to pick the judge who handles your case.
2. Neither do you necessarily ever appear in front of that judge, especially in a divorce action. That's the lawyer's jobs who are representing the plaintiff and defendant.
3. So read the article again, dimwit. There is nothing either from Moore's attorney today or the Gateway BLOG that says she appeared in court in front of Moore.
4. It says he dismissed her case.

If the judge has a conflict of interest, you can get a new judge, dumbass, and the judge's signasture would appear on the dismisall papers.

You're a moron.

 

[bripat9643]

Wow. Imagine being assigned a pedophile Judge that raped you as a child. Disgusting.

If she found it disgusting she could have requested another Judge. She didn't.

Maybe she did. You act like you've got all the facts and the fact is you ain't got shit except your opinion.

Ironic, considering all you douchebags think you have all the so-called "facts." It turns out they aren't facts, after all.

 

[bripat9643]

The ABA is just another leftwing propaganda organ. Their ratings don't mean jack shit.

Just like the NBER is a leftwing propaganda organ?

That's exactly what it is. Government bureaucracies are all biased in favor of govenrment.

 

[JoeMoma]

...They cannot kick him out because of something he did 40 years before he was ever in the Senate...

Sure they can.

...You need to learn that rules do apply. Most libs think they don't!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

We would have no senate if everyone with a fundamentally flawed character were kicked out!

 

[Lysistrata]

Why was Moore even tangled with this.? We already know that he is an advocate of an off-shoot of a protestant belief system that identifies itself as "Christian."

 

[IM2]

So I guess it's OK for a grown man to go after children. Especially if he is a republican. No law applies to republicans, the law only applies to democrats.

Fascism.

 

[Esmeralda]

Another hole in an accuser's story. This is getting predictable.

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION!

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION! An attorney for GOP Alabama Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore revealed Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelson lied when she said no contact had been made between the Judge and herself following the alleged sexual advancement in 1977.​

Gateway Pundit. Seriously! LMAO

 

[Esmeralda]

Wow. Imagine being assigned a pedophile Judge that raped you as a child. Disgusting.

Shit stain.....they didn't even say he raped her. Bill clinton did, in fact rape at least 3 women....you guys attacked those women....

In fact? Really? Where's the evidence?

 

[EverCurious]

RE Divorce Court

I find it interesting that folks don't have to go to the court room for a divorce. My ex husband and I filed for a dissolution in hmmm 2000 (Alaska) and we had to see the judge three times. Once to get ordered to watch a stupid ass counseling movie about staying together or not, then to talk about our fully open visitation schedule (he wanted shit on paper and apparently thought we were fighting or some shit so we'd not be able to figure it out ourselves,) then the third time where he kind of chided us for giving up on our marriage as he signed the dissolution paperwork

Ironically we went outside the court house and had a tearful hug. Not so much that we wanted to stay married, but idk fear/worry that we really were doing the wrong thing for our boys. Thankfully, it all worked out perfectly - better than if we'd stayed together. Mom 2 compliments all those things I cannot do, and Dad 2 complimented dad's flaws. Still... I'm not sure I'd recommend it to anyone heh

 

[hadit]

Wow. Imagine being assigned a pedophile Judge that raped you as a child. Disgusting.

Who is even alleging rape?

 

[Kondor3]

...They cannot kick him out because of something he did 40 years before he was ever in the Senate...

Sure they can.

...You need to learn that rules do apply. Most libs think they don't!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

We would have no senate if everyone with a fundamentally flawed character were kicked out!

There are flaws, and there are flaws.

Pedophilia is a Zero Tolerance flaw, in such a context.

Zero.

 

[Kondor3]

Sure they can.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

The ever liberal LA Times disagrees that no one will expel him because he did not violate Senate rules and was not facing a criminal charge.

Mitch McConnel's opinion counts within the walls of the Senate chambers just a wee bit more than your grasping-at-straws LA Times reference.

Really? Most of the Republicans in the Senate are calling for his head on a plate!

Bingo... so is McConnel... who promised, this very day, to haul him in front of the Senate Ethics Committee, very shortly after being sworn in.

McConnell is working very hard to get fired as majority leader. He know he stands no chance of getting reelected the next time as his primary challenger is now the governor. He is hanging on by his fingernails.

Doesn't matter... McConnel's driving the bus at the moment... and if Moore shows-up on the Senate steps, McConnel's gonna run him over...

Step 1: Moore gets sworn in
Step 2: Ten seconds later, Moore is referred to the Senate Ethics Committee
Step 3: The Senate Ethics Committee brings-in a half-dozen credible accusers.
Step 4: The Senate Ethics Committee recommends expelling Moore to the Senate at-large
Step 5: The Senate expels Moore
Step 6: Those who supported Moore are forevermore labeled as pedophilia sympathizers

You'd better hope that the People of Alabama have enough horse sense to prevent that from happening.

Either way, your boy is dog-meat...

You would do well consider that it is better to lose a seat than it is to be seen supporting a pedophile.

Losing a seat would be FAR less damaging, over the long haul.

FAR less.

But it is the fate of Man that partisanship oftentimes clouds the mind until it's too late.

Good luck trying to break free of that quagmire, while there is still time.

 

[JoeMoma]

...They cannot kick him out because of something he did 40 years before he was ever in the Senate...

Sure they can.

...You need to learn that rules do apply. Most libs think they don't!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

We would have no senate if everyone with a fundamentally flawed character were kicked out!

There are flaws, and there are flaws.

Pedophilia is a Zero Tolerance flaw, in such a context.

Zero.

I agree, if it's proven that he is a Pedophile, then he should be in jail, not the senate. That being said, I'm going to wait to see how things play out before I call him a pedophile. However, at minimum it does seem that he liked to date high school girls when he was in his thirties.....which is close enough to being a pedophile to some. It also opens him up to other allegations that may or may not be true.

 

[Mac1958]

I wonder if Moore's supporters have enough time between now and the election to effectively discredit the growing list of women who have come forward.

I guess that's the question of this election, huh?