P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 79,766
- 4,414
- 1,815
Instead of just blabbering on about Israel's BS talking points, how about a critique by an international law professor who actively works in that field?This wholesale exodus was due partly to the belief of the Arabs, blah, blah, blah. Israel constantly pounds on this issue but it is really meaningless. The reason people leave a conflict zone is irrelevant to the right to return. They could have just gone to Jordan for coffee and still have the right to return.
Conveniently "meaningless" to you but no country is required to resettle hostile "refugees" who may (or may not) have resided in that country at some previous time. As already mentioned, the UN relief agency had only minimal eligibility requirements and even they may have been ignored in the rush to sign up Arab "refugees" for 3-hots-&-a-cot. Hell, even Arafat was an Egyptian.
The above is the same canned, infomercial you have cut and pasted numerous times.
Without the benefit of an opportunity to have an opposing view being expressed or the opportunity to challenge the canned questions and prepared answers, what point is there in repeatedly cutting and pasting this infomercial? Does anyone get a free vegetable chopper for watching?
OK, but it is new to you because you have not seen it yet.
BTW, this is an open forum. You can post an opposing view any time.
This is an open forum. Within this venue, comments are subject to critique and refutation unlike your YouTube video which was a canned infomercial.
There's an obvious reason why such YouTube informercials appeal to a narrow audience.
You can pull out passages that you do not agree with noted by the time on the video. Or you can post a video rebuttal.
You don't have to just whine about my video.