Big Fitz
User Quit *****
- Nov 23, 2009
- 16,917
- 2,522
- 48
And we do not know for sure this was hacked by someone who DID have legal access. The person who posted this data is unknown. They very well may have had legal permission to access this. They knew enough to know where to look for it.Remember that the next time the libs get a 'Whistleblower' into something they find dangerous. We can count on you demanding their prosecution while the crime goes by unchallenged? Good to know.The end does NOT justify the means.
That is one fundamental difference between the right and left.
I agree the hackers should be prosecuted under appropriate laws and jurisdictions.
Thanks for speaking out for the hypocrites.
Apples and oranges.
whistleblowers typically have legal accessto the information they report on.
Hackers do not.
What is known is that it is too large a chunk of data to have been done through an external source, or someone's computer security was SERIOUSLY delinquent. 75% of a Terabyte??? Yeah, I don't see that being downloaded through a modem any time soon without getting caught.
Regardless. You're demanding that we focus on the hacker's crime and ignore the real BIG crime of global fraud it had uncovered. This smacks of ohhhh I dunno.... stupidity. Like busting a drug dealer for speeding and ignoring the bales of pot in the back seat in plain sight.