Books The Left Doesen't Want You To Read

[Publius1787]

Books The Left Doesen't Want You To Read

1. The Founders Constitution

2. The 5000 Year Leap
3. James Masions Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

4. The Federalist Papers
5. John Lockes Two Treatises of Government

6. Adam Smith's Wealth Of Nations

7. Milton Freidmans Free to Choose

8. Thomas Sowell's Basic Economics

9. Thomas Sowells's Applied Economics
10. F. A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom
11. Isiah Berlin's The Proper Study of Mankind

12. The Black Book of Communism

13. The Venona Secrets Exposing Soviet Espionage and America's Traitors

14. Blacklisted From History

15. New Deal or Raw Deal
16. The Forgotten Man
16. Woodrow Wilson and the Roots of Modern Liberalism

17. The Declaration of Independance, The U.S. Constitution, The Bill of Rights

18. The Fraiming of the 14th Amendment

19. The Ratification of the 14th Amendment

20. Government by Judiciary

21. Thomas Sowell's The Housing Boom and Bust

22. To Provide for the General Welfare:A History of the Federal Spending Power

23. Liberty and Tyranny

24. Milton Freidman's A Monetary History of the United States

25. Alexis de Tocqueville's Democracy in America

26. Cicero's De Legibus and De Republica

27. Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged

28. Liberal Fascism

29. The Real George Washington

30. The Real Thomas Jefferson
31. The Real Benjamin Franklin

33. American Progressivism

34. Setting the Record Straight: American History in Black & White

35. Thomas Paines Common Sence

36. Lennin, Stalin, Hitler: The Age of Social Catastrophe

37. Mao The Unknown Story

38. Black Americans and Organized Labor: A New History

39. The Economics of the Colour Bar

40. The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison


Please feel free to add to the list!

Amazon Links Removed - Modbert

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I read the "The Forgotten Man" and wanted to punch every one of my lying Progressive history professors in the face.

 

[Publius1787]

I read the "The Forgotten Man" and wanted to punch every one of my lying Progressive history professors in the face.

Oh, I hear ya! Amity Shlaes does a excellent job of setting the record straight!

 

[Mr. Peepers]

Actually, "the Left" wants people to read as many books as possible. You obviously don't know anyone on the left. Do you only read books from which you can interpret your strict partisan hackery, or do you also read books that you think go against your ideology?

 

[rikules]

I read the "The Forgotten Man" and wanted to punch every one of my lying Progressive history professors in the face.

and none of you scumbag liberals had better misinterpret my wanting to punch EVERY ONE of MY PROFESSORS in the face as VIOLENCE....

 

[rikules]

Actually, "the Left" wants people to read as many books as possible. You obviously don't know anyone on the left. Do you only read books from which you can interpret your strict partisan hackery, or do you read what you think are against your ideology?

It is my impression that they only read conservative authors who demonize liberals

 

[Mr. Peepers]

I wonder if they've also read "The Shock Doctrine" or "Failed States". I would bet not.

 

[Publius1787]

Actually, "the Left" wants people to read as many books as possible. You obviously don't know anyone on the left. Do you only read books from which you can interpret your strict partisan hackery, or do you also read books that you think go against your ideology?

Wich ones are you refering to as strict partisan hackery? Im sorry but the Communist Manefesto, Rules for Radicals, The Coming Insurection, A Peoples History of the United States, Rousseau's Social Contract, and anything done by advocates of socialist style government in the name of "social justice" like Naomi Klein or Noam Chomsky are not exactly classical liberalism/conservative material.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I read the "The Forgotten Man" and wanted to punch every one of my lying Progressive history professors in the face.

and none of you scumbag liberals had better misinterpret my wanting to punch EVERY ONE of MY PROFESSORS in the face as VIOLENCE....

Progressives are fucking liars and the loss of the media monopoly has exposed the damage they've done.

FDR: Miserable Failure

Joe McCarthy: Anti Communist America Hero

And if Progressives can't stop lying, they need to get the fuck out of the class rooms

 

[Mr. Peepers]

Revisionist history of the Great Depression told from the view of a monaterist? Good lord. No wonder.

 

[Mr. Peepers]

Wich ones are you refering to as strict partisan hackery?

Um, every post you put up? You can make interpretations from any text to fit your point of view if you try hard enough.

 

[MarcATL]

It is my impression that they only read conservative authors who demonize liberals

I've come to that same conclusion.

 

[Publius1787]

I read the "The Forgotten Man" and wanted to punch every one of my lying Progressive history professors in the face.

and none of you scumbag liberals had better misinterpret my wanting to punch EVERY ONE of MY PROFESSORS in the face as VIOLENCE....

I read the "The Forgotten Man" and wanted to punch every one of my lying Progressive history professors in the face.

Yeah! They do such an excellent job!

 

[PoliticalChic]

I read the "The Forgotten Man" and wanted to punch every one of my lying Progressive history professors in the face.

Frankie...where is your sense of political correctness1

I'm sure you mean 'lightly tap'...the cheeks.

Surely you don't want to be accused of 'blood libel'???

 

[PoliticalChic]

Revisionist history of the Great Depression told from the view of a monaterist? Good lord. No wonder.

Here, from two left of center sources:

1. Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…” He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term. “The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .


2. In 1935, the Brookings Institution (left-leaning) delivered a 900-page report on the New Deal and the National Recovery Administration, concluding that “ on the whole it retarded recovery.”

 

[California Girl]

I read the "The Forgotten Man" and wanted to punch every one of my lying Progressive history professors in the face.

and none of you scumbag liberals had better misinterpret my wanting to punch EVERY ONE of MY PROFESSORS in the face as VIOLENCE....

What is violent about wanting to punch someone?

It would be violent if one acted on the feeling.

Maybe that's the difference between the and the left. We don't misunderstand shit so much. The left see violence everywhere.... y'all must live in fear. The left feel the need to 'blame' others for things outside their control - somebody has to be responsible. The right feel we are all responsible for our own actions..... note, actions not feelings. (Example: see Juan Williams).

 

[Publius1787]

Revisionist history of the Great Depression told from the view of a monaterist? Good lord. No wonder.

Here, from two left of center sources:

1. Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…” He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term. “The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .


2. In 1935, the Brookings Institution (left-leaning) delivered a 900-page report on the New Deal and the National Recovery Administration, concluding that “ on the whole it retarded recovery.”

Can you provide a link to that study so I save it to my computer?

 

[Sheldon]

I don't care what political books anyone reads.

My hope is that people use them as windows instead of mirrors, but I just filled my hand with crap.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is my impression that they only read conservative authors who demonize liberals

I've come to that same conclusion.

Your premise is so obviously flawed: it is not conservative tomes one is forced to swallow if one attends college or universities.

No, it is the self educated who have found the truth after suffering through the indoctrinations of liberal educational establishments.

You on the left, on the other hand, have grown up in an echo chamber...

"Today’s college liberals ape the beliefs of 99 percent of their professors and then pretend they’re on-the-edge radicals. " Coulter

 

[PoliticalChic]

Revisionist history of the Great Depression told from the view of a monaterist? Good lord. No wonder.

Here, from two left of center sources:

1. Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., liberal New Deal historian wrote in The National Experience, in 1963, “Though the policies of the Hundred Days had ended despair, they had not produce recovery…” He also wrote honestly about the devastating crash of 1937- in the midst of the “second New Deal” and Roosevelt’s second term. “The collapse in the months after September 1937 was actually more severe than it had been in the first nine months of the depression: national income fell 13 %, payrolls 35 %, durable goods production 50 %, profits 78% .


2. In 1935, the Brookings Institution (left-leaning) delivered a 900-page report on the New Deal and the National Recovery Administration, concluding that “ on the whole it retarded recovery.”

Can you provide a link to that study so I save it to my computer?

Articles & Commentary