BOMBSHELL: Germany; Assad did not use chemical weapons!

There's no question that Martin Luther King Jr. was not a supporter of the Soviets.

There's equally no question that Martin Luther King Jr. was incredibly far-left.

Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that you guys would call him a communist, if he was alive today.

No I wouldn't. You can't just sit there and make assumptions about me like that Doc. I never thought he was a communist to begin with! So are we changing our story now? First "he is a communist for all intents and purposes" becomes "well you guys would call him a communist, if he was alive today." I cannot stand when someone paints with such an overly broad brush, or when he moves the goalposts.

You're right, I shouldn't assign values and opinions to you. I apologize.

I'll re-word.

I feel that if he was alive today, MLK Jr. would be considered a "communist" using the same criteria that Obama is considered a "communist".

Because there's no question that MLK Jr. was miles to the left of Obama.

Apology accepted. All is forgiven.

But please do explain in detail what you mean by "he is miles to the left of Obama."
 
Because being against military intervention in Syria doesn't somehow justify not using critical thinking when it comes to sources.
And does it matter that WE are the laughing stock all over the EU?

THAT is the point. Sorry YOU cannot see it...you really like being the butt of jokes at YOUR expense because WE have an inept leader?

WAKE UP.
Why? Youve never give a shit about europes opinion on us...you have repeatly told people we should leave the UN and kick them out of the usa.

Oh this is one of those " I can use it to bash obama" so fuck my own past statements, ill just contradict myself.
How's it feel to be the BUTT of jokes courtesy of your leader? How's it feel to be on your way to being a member of a Third-World Country that used to lead?

But then YOU are suckling at the Gubmint tit...what do YOU care anyway? YOU must thinks it's grand.

LOSER.
 
The only thing that gives the story credence is that it came from a RU source. There have been sketchy reports of an intercept that caught a high level commander calling a lower level commander of a unit that had control of chem weapons. The story has been that the high level commander was demanding to know what happened and what was going on under his command. This has been thrown out as a suggestion that "if" Syrian gov't forces were responsible for an attack, it would have been a mistake and not the direct result of orders from the high command. These reports of an intercept have come from US and Israel sources with no connections being made to the source. The German's did in fact have an intel gathering vessel off the Syrian coast, so there is some plausibility to the story. Why would the German gov't leak this story? It would be SOP to leak to a paper of the sort that first published the story. A more reputable paper might demand more proof and data about the strory. A crappy little scandal sheet would publish it without much more than an anonymous phone call. Give the story time to simmer until the believable media demands real answers. The question is, why has the RU picked up on it ? Do they know the truth as to whether the report is true of false ? The world is demanding proof. Could this be the proof ? Is RU attempting to set the west up for failure and embarassment because they know the story is fasle, or are they back peddling and preparing to accept that the story is true, but that it actually clears Assad and the high command ? How and would this effect US response and support or non-support for the US response ?
 
Actually, I don't really give a shit about this story, or whether it's true or false.

I don't support military action either way, and the chemical weapons nonsense is nothing more than nonsense. This is about gas pipelines, not chemical weapons.

Whatever the case may be... if you don't give a shit, why are you feeling compulsed to comment on it?

Because being against military intervention in Syria doesn't somehow justify not using critical thinking when it comes to sources.

So then why isn't the Obama administration using critical thinking skills when it comes to less than reliable intelligence? Somehow just the very existence of CW warrants military action. How impulsive.
 
No I wouldn't. You can't just sit there and make assumptions about me like that Doc. I never thought he was a communist to begin with! So are we changing our story now? First "he is a communist for all intents and purposes" becomes "well you guys would call him a communist, if he was alive today." I cannot stand when someone paints with such an overly broad brush, or when he moves the goalposts.

You're right, I shouldn't assign values and opinions to you. I apologize.

I'll re-word.

I feel that if he was alive today, MLK Jr. would be considered a "communist" using the same criteria that Obama is considered a "communist".

Because there's no question that MLK Jr. was miles to the left of Obama.

Apology accepted. All is forgiven.

But please do explain in detail what you mean by "he is miles to the left of Obama."

I mean that he supported a guaranteed minimum income, reparations for slavery and other injustice, was a great friend of organized labor, and surrounded himself with socialists, communists, and radical leftys.
 
Whatever the case may be... if you don't give a shit, why are you feeling compulsed to comment on it?

Because being against military intervention in Syria doesn't somehow justify not using critical thinking when it comes to sources.

So then why isn't the Obama administration using critical thinking skills when it comes to less than reliable intelligence? Somehow just the very existence of CW warrants military action. How impulsive.

"Chemical weapons" are a smokescreen, and have nothing to do with why we may (or may not) attack.
 
Remember September 11 of last year Obama's intelligence sources blamed the Benghazi attack on a youtube video...

Hey remember how that didnt happen? Because I do.


You remember wrong.

Here is Hillary still lying about the youtube video as the bodies of those killed in Benghazi are loaded into hearses.

Obama stands right beside her as she tells these lies.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSooz2wXpes]Obama and Hillary Blame Youtube Video for Benghazi Terrorist Attack as Coffins Arrive - YouTube[/ame]
 
You're right, I shouldn't assign values and opinions to you. I apologize.

I'll re-word.

I feel that if he was alive today, MLK Jr. would be considered a "communist" using the same criteria that Obama is considered a "communist".

Because there's no question that MLK Jr. was miles to the left of Obama.

Apology accepted. All is forgiven.

But please do explain in detail what you mean by "he is miles to the left of Obama."

I mean that he supported a guaranteed minimum income, reparations for slavery and other injustice, was a great friend of organized labor, and surrounded himself with socialists, communists, and radical leftys.

So how does that make him a radical leftist?
 
Because being against military intervention in Syria doesn't somehow justify not using critical thinking when it comes to sources.

So then why isn't the Obama administration using critical thinking skills when it comes to less than reliable intelligence? Somehow just the very existence of CW warrants military action. How impulsive.

"Chemical weapons" are a smokescreen, and have nothing to do with why we may (or may not) attack.

Sure could have fooled me.
 
Whatever the case may be... if you don't give a shit, why are you feeling compulsed to comment on it?

Because being against military intervention in Syria doesn't somehow justify not using critical thinking when it comes to sources.

So then why isn't the Obama administration using critical thinking skills when it comes to less than reliable intelligence? Somehow just the very existence of CW warrants military action. How impulsive.
And especially when he's had over a year and how many "RED LINE" crossings before now to deal with this?

Oh? He was too busy campaigning...and now must put on his big boy pants and save his ass. Just wait for Tuesday night. Only the extremely gullible will buy what he is selling.
 
So then why isn't the Obama administration using critical thinking skills when it comes to less than reliable intelligence? Somehow just the very existence of CW warrants military action. How impulsive.

"Chemical weapons" are a smokescreen, and have nothing to do with why we may (or may not) attack.

Sure could have fooled me.

It's about gas pipelines and doing favors for allies, not about chemical weapons.
 
Apology accepted. All is forgiven.

But please do explain in detail what you mean by "he is miles to the left of Obama."

I mean that he supported a guaranteed minimum income, reparations for slavery and other injustice, was a great friend of organized labor, and surrounded himself with socialists, communists, and radical leftys.

So how does that make him a radical leftist?

You don't think that reparations and a federally-mandated guaranteed minimum income are radically left wing?
 
And does it matter that WE are the laughing stock all over the EU?

THAT is the point. Sorry YOU cannot see it...you really like being the butt of jokes at YOUR expense because WE have an inept leader?

WAKE UP.
Why? Youve never give a shit about europes opinion on us...you have repeatly told people we should leave the UN and kick them out of the usa.

Oh this is one of those " I can use it to bash obama" so fuck my own past statements, ill just contradict myself.
How's it feel to be the BUTT of jokes courtesy of your leader? How's it feel to be on your way to being a member of a Third-World Country that used to lead?

But then YOU are suckling at the Gubmint tit...what do YOU care anyway? YOU must thinks it's grand.

LOSER.

Hey a deflection...who didnt see that coming from you.
 
Remember September 11 of last year Obama's intelligence sources blamed the Benghazi attack on a youtube video...

Hey remember how that didnt happen? Because I do.


You remember wrong.

Here is Hillary still lying about the youtube video as the bodies of those killed in Benghazi are loaded into hearses.

Obama stands right beside her as she tells these lies.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSooz2wXpes]Obama and Hillary Blame Youtube Video for Benghazi Terrorist Attack as Coffins Arrive - YouTube[/ame]

Nope...they didnt say the evidence was clear it was about a video. Just the evidence at the time showed it may be that but until further investigation had happened. They didnt know the root cause.
 
Hey remember how that didnt happen? Because I do.


You remember wrong.

Here is Hillary still lying about the youtube video as the bodies of those killed in Benghazi are loaded into hearses.

Obama stands right beside her as she tells these lies.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSooz2wXpes"]Obama and Hillary Blame Youtube Video for Benghazi Terrorist Attack as Coffins Arrive - YouTube[/ame]

Nope...they didnt say the evidence was clear it was about a video. Just the evidence at the time showed it may be that but until further investigation had happened. They didnt know the root cause.

The artful dodge...

Did you hear Hillary say "the root cause is not clear"?

I sure as fuck didn't.

When you don't know the root cause, you keep your fucking lying ass mouth the fuck shut when they are loading the bodies of the dead into hearses.

You know when you don't keep your lying ass fucking mouth shut when you don't know "the root cause".

When you know you fucked up and got people killed, but your election is at stake so you lie through your fucking teeth over the bodies of men whose lives YOU were responsible for...
 
Last edited:
You remember wrong.

Here is Hillary still lying about the youtube video as the bodies of those killed in Benghazi are loaded into hearses.

Obama stands right beside her as she tells these lies.

Obama and Hillary Blame Youtube Video for Benghazi Terrorist Attack as Coffins Arrive - YouTube

Nope...they didnt say the evidence was clear it was about a video. Just the evidence at the time showed it may be that but until further investigation had happened. They didnt know the root cause.

The artful dodge...

Did you hear Hillary say "the root cause is not clear"?

I sure as fuck didn't.

When you don't know the root cause, you keep your fucking lying ass mouth the fuck shut when they are loading the bodies of the dead into hearses.

You know when you don't keep your lying ass fucking mouth shut when you don't know "the root cause".

When you know you fucked up and got people killed, but your election is at stake so you lie through your fucking teeth over the bodies of men whose lives YOU were responsible for...

Yawn you cry a lot....fact remains what I said is the case. Regardless if they messed up or not.
 
I mean that he supported a guaranteed minimum income, reparations for slavery and other injustice, was a great friend of organized labor, and surrounded himself with socialists, communists, and radical leftys.

So how does that make him a radical leftist?

You don't think that reparations and a federally-mandated guaranteed minimum income are radically left wing?

Even Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson dabbled in pre-Marxism (it can be found in Common Sense itself at the beginning of the second chapter).

Does that make them radical Commies by modern standards?

Were reparations the focus of MLK's career? Or just a feeble side note?
 
So how does that make him a radical leftist?

You don't think that reparations and a federally-mandated guaranteed minimum income are radically left wing?

Even Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson dabbled in pre-Marxism (it can be found in Common Sense itself at the beginning of the second chapter).

Does that make them radical Commies by modern standards?

Were reparations the focus of MLK's career? Or just a feeble side note?

According to conservative's "modern standards", Ronald Reagan would be a "radical commie".

The focus of Martin Luther King's career was what we'd call nowadays "social justice". His opinions on reparations was as much a part of that as anything else.
 
Nope...they didnt say the evidence was clear it was about a video. Just the evidence at the time showed it may be that but until further investigation had happened. They didnt know the root cause.

The artful dodge...

Did you hear Hillary say "the root cause is not clear"?

I sure as fuck didn't.

When you don't know the root cause, you keep your fucking lying ass mouth the fuck shut when they are loading the bodies of the dead into hearses.

You know when you don't keep your lying ass fucking mouth shut when you don't know "the root cause".

When you know you fucked up and got people killed, but your election is at stake so you lie through your fucking teeth over the bodies of men whose lives YOU were responsible for...

Yawn you cry a lot....fact remains what I said is the case. Regardless if they messed up or not.

In your own mind, all evidence to the contrary.

You have present not a lick of evidence.

Other that you said so.

You are wrong.

And you are fooling no one.

Move the goalpost wherever you wish.
The mother of diplomat Sean Smith, who was killed in the Benghazi terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2012, said that at her son’s memorial service President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Ambassador Susan Rice told her that the attack occurred because of an anti-Muslim video, although evidence now shows the White House was told by the CIA “that Islamic extremists with ties to al Qaeda participated in the attack” and that the agency never mentioned a “video.”

- See more at: Slain Benghazi Officer's Mom: Obama, Clinton, Rice All Blamed the Video As 'They Were Hugging Me' | CNS News
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top