Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Over the last two years since President Obama has taken office, the federal government has added 200,000 new federal jobs," Boehner said. "And if some of those jobs are lost in this, so be it. We're broke. It's time for us to get serious about how we're spending the nation's money."
As it should be. When a private company has a revenue shortfall, they have to layoff workers. The government should be no different.
As it should be. When a private company has a revenue shortfall, they have to layoff workers. The government should be no different.
Understood. I wonder how many of our GIs will get laid off? So, where is that Jobs Bill?
As it should be. When a private company has a revenue shortfall, they have to layoff workers. The government should be no different.
Understood. I wonder how many of our GIs will get laid off? So, where is that Jobs Bill?
As it should be. When a private company has a revenue shortfall, they have to layoff workers. The government should be no different.
Understood. I wonder how many of our GIs will get laid off? So, where is that Jobs Bill?
As it should be. When a private company has a revenue shortfall, they have to layoff workers. The government should be no different.
Understood. I wonder how many of our GIs will get laid off? So, where is that Jobs Bill?
None. Sorry to disappoint you.
As it should be. When a private company has a revenue shortfall, they have to layoff workers. The government should be no different.
As it should be. When a private company has a revenue shortfall, they have to layoff workers. The government should be no different.
Understood. I wonder how many of our GIs will get laid off? So, where is that Jobs Bill?
Probably none. Defense has usually been exempt.
Whenever the government puts together a 'jobs bill', I always get a little nervous since the government cannot directly create jobs (except for government jobs which defeats the purpose since the private sector has to pay a high price for a government job). I would prefer they not do that. Instead, they should spend within their means and pay off the debt.
why is that yank think the government is the only means of creating jobs in a jobs bill?
Understood. I wonder how many of our GIs will get laid off? So, where is that Jobs Bill?
Probably none. Defense has usually been exempt.
Whenever the government puts together a 'jobs bill', I always get a little nervous since the government cannot directly create jobs (except for government jobs which defeats the purpose since the private sector has to pay a high price for a government job). I would prefer they not do that. Instead, they should spend within their means and pay off the debt.
I'm confused. During the run up to the 2010 elections, Boehner's mantra about Obama was "where's the jobs"? Are you saying that now that the GOP has control of the House, government can't create jobs?
As it should be. When a private company has a revenue shortfall, they have to layoff workers. The government should be no different.
Private companies have been laying off lately during times of crazy profits.
Which in turn caused much of the cyclical collapse in employment we've seen in recent years.
Off-shoring, Near Shoring, international conglomerates, reduction through removal of redundancy...in essence..De Facto Monopolies.
And the consolidation of wealth.
The march toward the Conservative goal of a Third World America continues! Good job boys!
I read somewhere this morning that Obama wants the IRS to hire around 1000 employees to start implenting the first stages of Obamacare. More government jobs!
I have little sympathy for government workers who may be laid off. All those perks and hefty paychecks ... awwwwww. Maybe they'll be picked up by the IRS.
Anywho ... good to see you VaYank! It's been awhile. If you haven't noticed, Madeline has been giving you a run for your money when it comes to starting Palin threads. Are you going to let her out-do you? *wink*
Regardless of what the wet brained orange guy from Ohio said, any kind of serious deficit reduction plan is going to involve job losses in both the public and private-ish sector. I don't see any reason why I should care any more for the federal employee losing their job than I do the person who builds fighter jets.
Regardless of what the wet brained orange guy from Ohio said, any kind of serious deficit reduction plan is going to involve job losses in both the public and private-ish sector. I don't see any reason why I should care any more for the federal employee losing their job than I do the person who builds fighter jets.
Because the pilot of said fighter jet could get laid off......
Regardless of what the wet brained orange guy from Ohio said, any kind of serious deficit reduction plan is going to involve job losses in both the public and private-ish sector. I don't see any reason why I should care any more for the federal employee losing their job than I do the person who builds fighter jets.
Because the pilot of said fighter jet could get laid off......
Not really.
