Blacks Plan to Riot When Zimmerman Walks

No riots yet that I have heard of.

What is irritating is that I turned on CNBC yesterday morning, they were reporting riots in Oakland, but when they showed film is was just fires in the middle of the street, no buildings or cars.

It was almost as if they were trying to INCITE riots.

Nah, not NBC... :eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:

628x471.jpg
 
Last edited:
No riots yet that I have heard of.

What is irritating is that I turned on CNBC yesterday morning, they were reporting riots in Oakland, but when they showed film is was just fires in the middle of the street, no buildings or cars.

It was almost as if they were trying to INCITE riots.

Nah, not NBC... :eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:

628x471.jpg

The only thing I seen was a protest in sanford, but not the mass looting and rioting people had hoped for.
 
Yesterday on the news the reporter who had been covering the protests all day said that she had spotted the same group of people who were going to different parts of the city agitating for violence. She saw them in Leimert Park, she saw them in Hollywood and again in the Crenshaw district. They agitate and disappear when the police show up.

I suspect this group are paid government activists.
 
The charge was 2nd degree murder, wasn't it? That makes it a murder case.

Zimmerman was found 'Not Guilty' so there was no murder committed. .. :cool:

"Not guilty" doesn't mean a murder wasn't committed, it only means the jury failed to find evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. When Zimmerman is sued in civil court where the standard is preponderance of evidence, he will lose. He'll probably lose everything he owns.
 
The charge was 2nd degree murder, wasn't it? That makes it a murder case.

Zimmerman was found 'Not Guilty' so there was no murder committed. .. :cool:

"Not guilty" doesn't mean a murder wasn't committed, it only means the jury failed to find evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. When Zimmerman is sued in civil court where the standard is preponderance of evidence, he will lose. He'll probably lose everything he owns.

He is immune from civil suits!!! He also can't face civil rights charges because neither he or TM was a state actor, and the place where it happened isn't state grounds. Hate crimes are very unlikely because they can't prove that he ultimately shot TM simply because he was black. Sorry bud, GZ is in the clear.
 
[youtube]zpMB2lK847o[/youtube]

4 more blacks just begged to go to jail or be shot. Gee I wonder why more blacks are in jail? Not only did they attack someone who was no threat to them. But these wannabe gangsta thugs continued beating the man when he was down, after he retreated & was yelling stop just like the self described "Gangster" Trayvon Martin did to GZ. This is some kinda hood justice code these idiots picked up being raised on gangster rap & the brainwashing effects is clear as day. It is contrary to over 600 years of self defense law in most countries of the world. Lethal force from a gun was justified to kill all 4 of those attackers.
 
He was tried for murder.

Since the case is officially over it really doesn't matter
 
The charge was 2nd degree murder, wasn't it? That makes it a murder case.

Zimmerman was found 'Not Guilty' so there was no murder committed. .. :cool:

"Not guilty" doesn't mean a murder wasn't committed, it only means the jury failed to find evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. When Zimmerman is sued in civil court where the standard is preponderance of evidence, he will lose. He'll probably lose everything he owns.

He is immune from civil suits!!! He also can't face civil rights charges because neither he or TM was a state actor, and the place where it happened isn't state grounds. Hate crimes are very unlikely because they can't prove that he ultimately shot TM simply because he was black. Sorry bud, GZ is in the clear.

He is not immune from civil suits.

A Wrongful death civil suit and a murder verdict have nothing to do with each other.

Remember OJ? He was found not guilty but he lost the civil suit.
 
By the media still referring to it as the Trayvon 'murder'.

They are just fanning the flames for racial division and civil unrest.

But I guess it's a way for the media to create more news for them to cover. .. :cool:
 
The charge was 2nd degree murder, wasn't it? That makes it a murder case.



"Not guilty" doesn't mean a murder wasn't committed, it only means the jury failed to find evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. When Zimmerman is sued in civil court where the standard is preponderance of evidence, he will lose. He'll probably lose everything he owns.

He is immune from civil suits!!! He also can't face civil rights charges because neither he or TM was a state actor, and the place where it happened isn't state grounds. Hate crimes are very unlikely because they can't prove that he ultimately shot TM simply because he was black. Sorry bud, GZ is in the clear.

He is not immune from civil suits.

A Wrongful death civil suit and a murder verdict have nothing to do with each other.

Remember OJ? He was found not guilty but he lost the civil suit.

He is immune in Florida after granting a not guilty verdict on self defense. Hold on I will post the law that says so.
 
The charge was 2nd degree murder, wasn't it? That makes it a murder case.



"Not guilty" doesn't mean a murder wasn't committed, it only means the jury failed to find evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. When Zimmerman is sued in civil court where the standard is preponderance of evidence, he will lose. He'll probably lose everything he owns.

He is immune from civil suits!!! He also can't face civil rights charges because neither he or TM was a state actor, and the place where it happened isn't state grounds. Hate crimes are very unlikely because they can't prove that he ultimately shot TM simply because he was black. Sorry bud, GZ is in the clear.

He is not immune from civil suits.

A Wrongful death civil suit and a murder verdict have nothing to do with each other.

Remember OJ? He was found not guilty but he lost the civil suit.

Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine

776.032 Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force.—
(1) A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012, s. 776.013, or s. 776.031 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, the term “criminal prosecution” includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting the defendant.
(2) A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use of force as described in subsection (1), but the agency may not arrest the person for using force unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used was unlawful.
(3) The court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses incurred by the defendant in defense of any civil action brought by a plaintiff if the court finds that the defendant is immune from prosecution as provided in subsection (1).
 
Many people mistakenly think the Zimmerman trial was about Florida's 'Stand your ground law'.

When in fact, it was a 'Self Defense' case. .. :cool:

True, but he can still have this hearing in a civil claim. When he does that he will have in his pocket a not guilty verdict on self defense. If he is granted this immunity, TM's family will be responsible for his attorney's fees as well. Filing a civil suit would be foolish on that ground alone, but also that GZ has no money.
 

Forum List

Back
Top