Black Privilege

[William Joyce]

Whites feel guilty because they believe they caused blacks to have a low IQ and a violent nature.

I am a black man. I am retired Navy and a home owner. I am college educated and have never been on welfare. I am married and my daughter is in college now.

You honestly think you are higher on the evolutionary scale than I am?

You think you have a higher IQ than I do? Do you think you are less prone to violence than I am? If so, why?

I applaud your achievements and salute your service. You might, in fact, have an IQ higher than the average white. Statistics show that 10 percent of black people do.

However, Zona, that leaves the other 90 percent.

Who don't.

We are talking about group averages here.

The ice-cold, earth-shattering fact is that blacks as a group are less intelligent than whites as a group. Inherently so. The difference is about 15 points in IQ. This fact has been true since it was measured during WWI and remains so today.

The bottom line is that blacks are a huge drag on whites. We pay through the ass for welfare and crime and low productivity. My point is not to bash blacks. They are who they are. But we as whites have been saddled with your eternal care. I'm not into it. I think the crime of slavery has been paid for a hundred times over. It is time to move on.

Whites need to separate themselves from you, Hispanics, even Asians... we need to do our own thing. You do your own thing.

 

[Si modo]

Another inferior-feeling-white-guy-afraid-of-blacks thread?

If not, let me know and I will read the rest of it.

Otherwise, I don't want to lose IQ points by reading drivel.

The thread has the usual suspects.

The link in the OP is fairly interesting.

Assuming that there are such meetings as were described.

Thanks. I'll read the link and see what I think.

ETA: Yes, the link in the OP seems like common sense.

 

[Ravi]

I doubt this ever happened.

A blog by an anonymous person on perhaps the lamest website of all time.

 

[Patrick2]

Your boyfriend?

No - your ancestors. Near ancestors.

Oh your sister?

No, some fellow named ugga-bugga-boo, or something.

 

[Patrick2]

Not to defend him.

Shaka Zulu had one thing in common with Vlad Dracul.

They bothed shoved picks up peoples asses and hoisted them up.

He stopped that after the British army sorted them out.

His own people killed him.

They tired of his tryanny. The Brits mopped up what was left.

The Battle of Ulundi was "mopping up"? Er......OK..........

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Another inferior-feeling-white-guy-afraid-of-blacks thread?

If not, let me know and I will read the rest of it.

Otherwise, I don't want to lose IQ points by reading drivel.

Actually it's not. It's a renunciation of it if I understand you correctly.

 

[Two Thumbs]

He stopped that after the British army sorted them out.

His own people killed him.

They tired of his tryanny. The Brits mopped up what was left.

The Battle of Ulundi was "mopping up"? Er......OK..........

People with rifles vs. people with spears.


That much of a vast difference in tech = slaughter. Even though the Zulu had numbers.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Re the idiotic turn of this thread: whites' wars have been more deadly because of their technological superiority, not because blacks have a tender regard for their fellow men. If you're in the african jungle just running around spearing people in the butt, there's a limit to how many people you can kill.

Spearing people in the butt? yeah I bet you'd like that you fucking retard.

No, I think the revolving finger is pointing at you. Ya sort of missed the point there . . . by several light years.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

No - your ancestors. Near ancestors.

Oh your sister?

No, some fellow named ugga-bugga-boo, or something.

 

[Patrick2]

His own people killed him.

They tired of his tryanny. The Brits mopped up what was left.

The Battle of Ulundi was "mopping up"? Er......OK..........

People with rifles vs. people with spears.


That much of a vast difference in tech = slaughter. Even though the Zulu had numbers.

No actually, the zulus were armed with rifles for that battle.

 

[High_Gravity]

Re the idiotic turn of this thread: whites' wars have been more deadly because of their technological superiority, not because blacks have a tender regard for their fellow men. If you're in the african jungle just running around spearing people in the butt, there's a limit to how many people you can kill.

Spearing people in the butt? yeah I bet you'd like that you fucking retard.

No, I think the revolving finger is pointing at you. Ya sort of missed the point there . . . by several light years.

Go fuck yourself.

 

[High_Gravity]

No - your ancestors. Near ancestors.

Oh your sister?

No, some fellow named ugga-bugga-boo, or something.

Oh your mother, got it.

 

[Two Thumbs]

The Battle of Ulundi was "mopping up"? Er......OK..........

People with rifles vs. people with spears.


That much of a vast difference in tech = slaughter. Even though the Zulu had numbers.

No actually, the zulus were armed with rifles for that battle.

oh yeah,

Captured rifles they had almost no idea how to use.

 

[Patrick2]

People with rifles vs. people with spears.


That much of a vast difference in tech = slaughter. Even though the Zulu had numbers.

No actually, the zulus were armed with rifles for that battle.

oh yeah,

Captured rifles they had almost no idea how to use.

Actually rolleyes they had been using them at least since the Battle of Roarke's Drift, knew how to use them, and had adopted British mass firing for effect techniques, and even had sharpshooters picking off British soldiers from a distance at Ulundi. As well as captured rifles, they'd purchased some from the Boers.

 

[Lars]

Whites feel guilty because they believe they caused blacks to have a low IQ and a violent nature.

I think your ancestors should feel guilty for giving you a bad case of the dumbs. When genes were getting handed out, you definitely got shorted.

Exactly, because everyone knows of the 700,000 or so interracial crimes, 90% are committed by Whites and 10% by Blacks. And Whites have an average IQ of 85 while Blacks have an average IQ of 100. Oh wait...
Larry Elder
Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

 

[Salt Jones]

Whites feel guilty because they believe they caused blacks to have a low IQ and a violent nature.

I think your ancestors should feel guilty for giving you a bad case of the dumbs. When genes were getting handed out, you definitely got shorted.

Exactly, because everyone knows of the 700,000 or so interracial crimes, 90% are committed by Whites and 10% by Blacks. And Whites have an average IQ of 85 while Blacks have an average IQ of 100. Oh wait...
Larry Elder
Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

Yet whites were dumb enough to vote for a racist, black, socialist, nazi, communist, marxist for president.
P.S. How'd you get back from Norway so fast?

 

[Patrick2]

I think your ancestors should feel guilty for giving you a bad case of the dumbs. When genes were getting handed out, you definitely got shorted.

Exactly, because everyone knows of the 700,000 or so interracial crimes, 90% are committed by Whites and 10% by Blacks. And Whites have an average IQ of 85 while Blacks have an average IQ of 100. Oh wait...
Larry Elder
Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

Yet whites were dumb enough to vote for a racist, black, socialist, nazi, communist, marxist for president.
P.S. How'd you get back from Norway so fast?

Actually, a minority of whites did - the special interests he'd bought off like unions and government "workers", plus the 18 year olds who attended his koolaid parties.

 

[Salt Jones]

Exactly, because everyone knows of the 700,000 or so interracial crimes, 90% are committed by Whites and 10% by Blacks. And Whites have an average IQ of 85 while Blacks have an average IQ of 100. Oh wait...
Larry Elder
Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

Yet whites were dumb enough to vote for a racist, black, socialist, nazi, communist, marxist for president.
P.S. How'd you get back from Norway so fast?

Actually, a minority of whites did - the special interests he'd bought off like unions and government "workers", plus the 18 year olds who attended his koolaid parties.

So 43% of whites are union, government worker or 18 year olds?

 

[Patrick2]

Yet whites were dumb enough to vote for a racist, black, socialist, nazi, communist, marxist for president.
P.S. How'd you get back from Norway so fast?

Actually, a minority of whites did - the special interests he'd bought off like unions and government "workers", plus the 18 year olds who attended his koolaid parties.

So 43% of whites are union, government worker or 18 year olds?

Those are the main ones - of course there are other fragments which add up. Another group is brainwashed young never-to-be-married white women, who look at the government as their "husband", and will vote for the candidate who proposes a huge expansion of government.

Another is the group of people who bought the round-the-clock lib media propaganda that laid the leftwing-caused financial meltdown at the GOP doorstep.

 

[Lars]

I think your ancestors should feel guilty for giving you a bad case of the dumbs. When genes were getting handed out, you definitely got shorted.

Exactly, because everyone knows of the 700,000 or so interracial crimes, 90% are committed by Whites and 10% by Blacks. And Whites have an average IQ of 85 while Blacks have an average IQ of 100. Oh wait...
Larry Elder
Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

Yet whites were dumb enough to vote for a racist, black, socialist, nazi, communist, marxist for president.
P.S. How'd you get back from Norway so fast?

Yes, there are many dumb whites, you ever heard of a bell curve? And you can still have a high IQ and be politically retarded.

"racist, black, socialist, nazi, communist, marxist for president."
See, this kind of talk proves my point about dumb people and the bell curve.

"P.S. How'd you get back from Norway so fast?"
I am not from Norway.