Bill O'reilly, fired for sexual harassment is defending a self-admitted sexual predator, both of whom are over 70 years old.
Conservatism, it is what it is.
This thread makes me hungry for falafel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bill O'reilly, fired for sexual harassment is defending a self-admitted sexual predator, both of whom are over 70 years old.
Conservatism, it is what it is.
WHAT "real stories" ? You mean fairy tales ?Ah Bull O'Liarly, there's a credible source.
The glaring flaw here of course is the law of supply and demand. It's not necessary to offer money, let alone $200k, to make up a story. Real stories already abound. Unpaid ones. Only in a world where Rump was a celibate monk would it be anywhere near necessary to fabricate something.
O'Liarly be all like
Has O'Reilly provided that tape yet?
Who would believe Bill O'Reilly. Seriously. How many people have accused trump? How many people have accused moore? Yet they are not to be believed, but O'Reilly is? With his history?
Oreilley isnt credible. But more credible than you, pogo..unpaid? how do you know?Ah Bull O'Liarly, there's a credible source.
The glaring flaw here of course is the law of supply and demand. It's not necessary to offer money, let alone $200k, to make up a story. Real stories already abound. Unpaid ones. Only in a world where Rump was a celibate monk would it be anywhere near necessary to fabricate something.
O'Liarly be all like
I pulled a 4.0 in Economics, that's how.
True story too. I got extra credit when the prof asked us to "spell entrepreneur" and I spelt it in both male and female versions. The advantages of being a cunning linguist.
Oreilley isnt credible. But more credible than you, pogo..unpaid? how do you know?Ah Bull O'Liarly, there's a credible source.
The glaring flaw here of course is the law of supply and demand. It's not necessary to offer money, let alone $200k, to make up a story. Real stories already abound. Unpaid ones. Only in a world where Rump was a celibate monk would it be anywhere near necessary to fabricate something.
O'Liarly be all like
I pulled a 4.0 in Economics, that's how.
True story too. I got extra credit when the prof asked us to "spell entrepreneur" and I spelt it in both male and female versions. The advantages of being a cunning linguist.
Oreilley isnt credible. But more credible than you, pogo..unpaid? how do you know?Ah Bull O'Liarly, there's a credible source.
The glaring flaw here of course is the law of supply and demand. It's not necessary to offer money, let alone $200k, to make up a story. Real stories already abound. Unpaid ones. Only in a world where Rump was a celibate monk would it be anywhere near necessary to fabricate something.
O'Liarly be all like
I pulled a 4.0 in Economics, that's how.
True story too. I got extra credit when the prof asked us to "spell entrepreneur" and I spelt it in both male and female versions. The advantages of being a cunning linguist.
You ever seen me claiming I have a tape of somebody paid $200k to make up something that's already readily available?
Ever seen me order a "loofa" in a Middle Eastern restaurant?
OK then.
Has that tape shown up yet?Are you? Where is the proof of Russian collusion?Oh dear....are you panicking?Up your ass, how should I know?Where's the tape?Why would anyone need to make false claims?
There are so many real ones to choose from
You don't know what is true or not. It is just a lot easier to attack the person than debate what they think. Lazy bum.
Has proof of collusion showed up yet?Has that tape shown up yet?Are you? Where is the proof of Russian collusion?Oh dear....are you panicking?Up your ass, how should I know?Where's the tape?You don't know what is true or not. It is just a lot easier to attack the person than debate what they think. Lazy bum.
Not quite enough, tho.
then by all means the lying serial sex harasser should produce it. let's go!
So...everyone is guilty until proven innocent according to you? I bet that even if he does produce that tape you will claim it's false.
Since when is a political campaign a criminal trial? Only to trumptards.
Notice that neither the sexual predator in the White House or the child molester have done what they said .... which is sue for defamation.
Again keep supporting the child molester.
Unproven. What he will vote for is not unproven, and that is why he will get the vote.
The NUMBER of accusers is irrelevant. All that matters is EVIDENCE.Who would believe Bill O'Reilly. Seriously. How many people have accused trump? How many people have accused moore? Yet they are not to be believed, but O'Reilly is? With his history?
They should be SUING YOU for defamation.Since when is a political campaign a criminal trial? Only to trumptards.
Notice that neither the sexual predator in the White House or the child molester have done what they said .... which is sue for defamation.
Again keep supporting the child molester.
YOU are who is "creepy"Where should it be "proven". There is nothing not credible about this. The creep had the hots for his own wife when she was 15.
Or creepy Roy could have sued for defamation like he said he would. But why do that when you have dukes who believe every bit of lying lunacy that comes out of his mouth.
That said he's already been proven to be incapable of upholding the constitution by twice getting tossed from the bench for his failure to abide by orders of superior courts.
And if that part confuses you, you might want to go look up what our common law system of law is.
A lot. Against both.The NUMBER of accusers is irrelevant. All that matters is EVIDENCE.Who would believe Bill O'Reilly. Seriously. How many people have accused trump? How many people have accused moore? Yet they are not to be believed, but O'Reilly is? With his history?
Evidence against Trump >> ZERO.
Evidence against Moore >> ZERO.