Big win for President Trump

[Cellblock2429]

This is HUUUUGE. Judge pauses Trump trial await USSC decision.

 

[Moonglow]

Yes, we found that out three days ago. Yet, Trump did not put forth the motion it was the DOJ and what's his name that is the prosecutor character.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes, we found that out three days ago. Yet, Trump did not put forth the motion it was the DOJ and what's his name that is the prosecutor character.

Basically defining the extent of Presidential immunity

I don’t think Trump will be too happy

 

[elektra]

The rule of law has been destroyed by the Democrats and some Republicans. A true justice is if all these court cases get thrown out.

 

[Moonglow]

The rule of law has been destroyed by the Democrats and some Republicans. A true justice is if all these court cases get thrown out.

There is no rule of law, law is the art of argument using rhetoric.

 

[two_iron]

Legal scholars are predicting a decision upholding the Constitution, obviously in favor of President Trump, and the likes of this pathetic shitstain will be banished back to the hague again because nobody likes a congenital loser.

 

[Marener]

This is HUUUUGE. Judge pauses Trump trial await USSC decision.

It’s not really that huge. This is just the process and the judge is just following the rules.

Trump is merely abusing the system with frivolous arguments that will fail solely to delay the trial as long as he can.

 

[DudleySmith]

The rule of law has been destroyed by the Democrats and some Republicans. A true justice is if all these court cases get thrown out.

they're just using govt. money to bankrupt private citizens into submission for their own party's benefit. They're gangsters. Only dopers, commies, and deviants support them, and they know they're going to lose in 2024 in a big way and face RICO charges, from Obama to the FBI to the IRS, to the CIA and every Federal Court that has been corrupted by the scum.

 

[Marener]

Legal scholars are predicting a decision upholding the Constitution, obviously in favor of President Trump, and the likes of this pathetic shitstain will be banished back to the hague again because nobody likes a congenital loser.

View attachment 874004

Do you know anything about the last “witch hunt” you’re describing?

A republican was literally selling influence to the government. The supreme court agreed that selling influence isn’t illegal.

 

[Moonglow]

It is a legitimate question for some looking to not get into trouble for being a dork. But, it is under the fast track lane and Trump's attorney had to deliver an answer to the question posted so I can see an answer by February.

 

[Marener]

they're just using govt. money to bankrupt private citizens into submission for their own party's benefit. They're gangsters. Only dopers, commies, and deviants support them, and they know they're going to lose in 2024 in a big way and face RICO charges, from Obama to the FBI to the IRS, to the CIA and every Federal Court that has been corrupted by the scum.

You’re thinking of John Durham baselessly going after Democrats

 

[okfine]

Legal scholars are predicting a decision upholding the Constitution, obviously in favor of President Trump, and the likes of this pathetic shitstain will be banished back to the hague again because nobody likes a congenital loser.

View attachment 874004

I think you're going to be disappointed when it's an 8 to 1 decision.

 

[two_iron]

Do you know anything about the last “witch hunt” you’re describing?

A republican was literally selling influence to the government. The supreme court agreed that selling influence isn’t illegal.

What part of the McDonnell v. United States 8-0 decision are you vapor-locking on?

As usual, shitlibs are "don't believe your lying eyes!!" stupid.

Don't look now, but your girlfriend is wiping her dick on your curtains and posting it on TikTok. Just trying to help.

 

[two_iron]

SCOTUS almost NEVER overturns criminal convictions.

But they did with this piece of shit.... unanimously.

What an honor.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. The supreme court has to defend the Presidency or gets lost in the shuffle.
2. Democrats will lose.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Moonglow]

What part of the McDonnell v. United States 8-0 decision are you vapor-locking on?

As usual, shitlibs are "don't believe your lying eyes!!" stupid.

Don't look now, but your girlfriend is wiping her dick on your curtains and posting it on TikTok. Just trying to help.

https://www.brainyquote.com/photos_tr/en/t/theodoreroosevelt/380703/theodoreroosevelt1-2x.jpg

 

[Marener]

What part of the McDonnell v. United States 8-0 decision are you vapor-locking on?

As usual, shitlibs are "don't believe your lying eyes!!" stupid.

Don't look now, but your girlfriend is wiping her dick on your curtains and posting it on TikTok. Just trying to help.

So you guys think it’s ridiculous to prosecute someone for selling access to the government.

Right?

 

[BackAgain]

There is no rule of law, law is the art of argument using rhetoric.

The claim of the ignorant and tragically dishonest.

 

[Moonglow]

The claim of the ignorant and tragically dishonest.

Spoken like a true ignorant bastard alone in the woods.

Rhetoric: The Art of Legal ArgumentAn art in its third millennium, legal rhetoric combines theory, skill, and practice as advocates craft arguments for a particular audience brought together to determine a specific matter that demands resolution.

The Art of Legal Argument - Minnesota CLE​

 

[BackAgain]

Spoken like a true ignorant bastard alone in the woods.

Rhetoric: The Art of Legal ArgumentAn art in its third millennium, legal rhetoric combines theory, skill, and practice as advocates craft arguments for a particular audience brought together to determine a specific matter that demands resolution.

The Art of Legal Argument - Minnesota CLE​

Notice the unsubtle change in Goonblow’s “argument.”

Nobody disputes that legal advocacy requires the use of rhetoric, you moron

But that’s not what you had claimed. Just noting your persistent use of dishonesty.