For anyone who likes to read this article is informative. So many people have know idea what they are talking about but are sure there is a Democrat to blame around here somewhere and that is all that matters to them.
NYT: Benghazi attacks had no private security backup - The New York Times - TODAY.com
Many diplomats rankle at the constraints imposed on them by security officials, who demand that they travel around foreign capitals in heavily armored convoys that local civilians find insulting and that make it nearly impossible for the envoys to meet discreetly with foreign officials. Many American diplomats have also grown deeply frustrated by the constraints imposed on them by working in the new, highly secure embassies that have been constructed around the world over the past decade.
How do you think anything in that article excuses this administration?
Don't take this personally or anything but you're a dumb ass, actually you should probably take that personally.
So you couldn't find anything in that article that excused the administration either huh? Look. You can reduce yourself to a grade school mentality and name call all you like but that doesn't lessen Obama's and his administrations failure in this. Libya was supposed to be a foreign policy achievement for Obama and he was so busy playing celebrity that he failed to keep up with what was going on. The article you posted is another effort by media to try to mitigate the damage to this administration from this.