Biden said him and Obama were clueless about Bengazi

Here. I did the leg work for you dumb ass republicans, AGAIN.

Is President Obama ‘Skipping’ Intelligence Briefings? - ABC News
While his predecessor might have preferred an oral daily briefing, Obama religiously reads a written version of the same prepared material, often on a secure iPad (as seen in this official White House PHOTO). He often receives an in-person briefing in addition, aides note, as well as real-time national security updates during the day, both in the office and on the road.

“He does both all the time, all the time,” White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters today. “And when he is here in Washington, he has briefings in person in the Oval Office with his national security team regularly. And when he is on the road, he has phone conversations that supplement and augment the briefings he receives on paper that are specific to the so-called PDB. I hardly think that is different from previous presidents.”

Aides say there is no evidence to suggest an in-person briefing is any more or less efficient or effective than the president’s consuming the material electronically or in print.

“The quarters from which that criticism comes are pretty clear, and who occupies those quarters is pretty clear,” Carney said of Obama’s critics on the right. “This president is absolutely responsible and voracious consumer of the presidential daily briefing and of the information provided to him by his national security team.

The only thing you did was find a favorable source, there are many that don't attempt to spin this and don't support your contentions.

Obama knew what was going on, he KNEW that mre security had been requested and he made a conscios decision to not give it to him.

He knew the same day and yet he sent his minions out for a week trying to spin a different tal.

So are you saying that since there was not a force large enough to repel the attack on the consulate it was a failure on Obama's fault?
 
Here. I did the leg work for you dumb ass republicans, AGAIN.

Is President Obama ‘Skipping’ Intelligence Briefings? - ABC News
While his predecessor might have preferred an oral daily briefing, Obama religiously reads a written version of the same prepared material, often on a secure iPad (as seen in this official White House PHOTO). He often receives an in-person briefing in addition, aides note, as well as real-time national security updates during the day, both in the office and on the road.

“He does both all the time, all the time,” White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters today. “And when he is here in Washington, he has briefings in person in the Oval Office with his national security team regularly. And when he is on the road, he has phone conversations that supplement and augment the briefings he receives on paper that are specific to the so-called PDB. I hardly think that is different from previous presidents.”

Aides say there is no evidence to suggest an in-person briefing is any more or less efficient or effective than the president’s consuming the material electronically or in print.

“The quarters from which that criticism comes are pretty clear, and who occupies those quarters is pretty clear,” Carney said of Obama’s critics on the right. “This president is absolutely responsible and voracious consumer of the presidential daily briefing and of the information provided to him by his national security team.

Bottom line, you take credit for the success, you take responsibility for the failures.

Time for this administration man up, it's time for someone to step up and be responsible. Since we know it won't be Obama and Biden, who is going to man up, who is the one with the kahunas?

What exactly was the failure here? Is it solely that you think the administration was trying to cover up a terrorist attack as a mob attack? For how long did they hope the 'cover up' to last? Past November 6th? Seriously?

Your concept of a deliberate 'cover up' is illogical. What purpose would it serve? Or is the 'failure' something else.

The only damage that has been caused since the attack is the republican committee outing a CIA team. Does that bother you at all?

Who have heard that they are going to get to the bottom of all this. Who is taking the fall?
 
Here. I did the leg work for you dumb ass republicans, AGAIN.

Is President Obama ‘Skipping’ Intelligence Briefings? - ABC News
While his predecessor might have preferred an oral daily briefing, Obama religiously reads a written version of the same prepared material, often on a secure iPad (as seen in this official White House PHOTO). He often receives an in-person briefing in addition, aides note, as well as real-time national security updates during the day, both in the office and on the road.

“He does both all the time, all the time,” White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters today. “And when he is here in Washington, he has briefings in person in the Oval Office with his national security team regularly. And when he is on the road, he has phone conversations that supplement and augment the briefings he receives on paper that are specific to the so-called PDB. I hardly think that is different from previous presidents.”

Aides say there is no evidence to suggest an in-person briefing is any more or less efficient or effective than the president’s consuming the material electronically or in print.

“The quarters from which that criticism comes are pretty clear, and who occupies those quarters is pretty clear,” Carney said of Obama’s critics on the right. “This president is absolutely responsible and voracious consumer of the presidential daily briefing and of the information provided to him by his national security team.

The only thing you did was find a favorable source, there are many that don't attempt to spin this and don't support your contentions.

Obama knew what was going on, he KNEW that mre security had been requested and he made a conscios decision to not give it to him.

He knew the same day and yet he sent his minions out for a week trying to spin a different tal.

So are you saying that since there was not a force large enough to repel the attack on the consulate it was a failure on Obama's fault?
No, it was Bush's fault.
 
Bottom line, you take credit for the success, you take responsibility for the failures.

Time for this administration man up, it's time for someone to step up and be responsible. Since we know it won't be Obama and Biden, who is going to man up, who is the one with the kahunas?

What exactly was the failure here? Is it solely that you think the administration was trying to cover up a terrorist attack as a mob attack? For how long did they hope the 'cover up' to last? Past November 6th? Seriously?

Your concept of a deliberate 'cover up' is illogical. What purpose would it serve? Or is the 'failure' something else.

The only damage that has been caused since the attack is the republican committee outing a CIA team. Does that bother you at all?

Who have heard that they are going to get to the bottom of all this. Who is taking the fall?

When you say 'they' who are you referring to?
 
The only thing you did was find a favorable source, there are many that don't attempt to spin this and don't support your contentions.

Obama knew what was going on, he KNEW that mre security had been requested and he made a conscios decision to not give it to him.

He knew the same day and yet he sent his minions out for a week trying to spin a different tal.

So are you saying that since there was not a force large enough to repel the attack on the consulate it was a failure on Obama's fault?
No, it was Bush's fault.

Thank you for the completely meaningless post. You obviously are a person of deep intellectual thought.
 

Forum List

Back
Top