BHO and the 09-2010 congress failed the Democratic party worse than any-one

Feds sue banks over bad securities - FSU Voice - Fayetteville State University


In a bold move on Sept. 2, the Federal Housing Finance agency filed lawsuits against 17 banks for their alleged practice of fraudulently selling close to $200 billion in securities linked to subprime mortgages.

Several of the banks are major American financial institutions, who some economists say were nearly single-handedly responsible 2008's recession. Bank of America, Merrill Lynch & Co., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Goldman Sachs & Co., were among the banks listed in the FHFA's legal filings report.

A subprime mortgage is "a type of loan granted to individuals [or couples] with poor credit histories (often below 600), who, as a result of their deficient credit ratings, would not be able to qualify for conventional mortgages," according to Investopedia.com. These mortgages often have higher interest rates than traditional loans of the same type. And most commonly, they're adjustable rate mortgages, in which many individuals with poor credit do not understand.

Investopedia continues, "Many lenders were more liberal in granting these loans from 2004 to 2006 as a result of lower interest rates and high capital liquidity. Lenders sought additional profits through these higher risk loans, and they charged interest rates above prime in order to compensate for the additional risk they assumed. Consequently, once the rate of subprime mortgage foreclosures skyrocketed, many lenders experienced extreme financial difficulties, and even bankruptcy."

The 17 banks are being accused of participating in this unethical lending practice.

Un ethical?
Or illegal?
and GS does not loan money, there a Hedge fund, not a commercial bank
That has nothing to do with the problem and what the Dems did when they finally got power

Real estate values remain high
None of these events take place
 
It took 12 years for the liberals to get the congress back (except the 01-02 senate when J Jeffers jumped ship)

8 years of solid lies about GWB in conjunction with the Credit bubble bursting (which was no fault of GWB) to create the perfect storm

In 4 years the house was lost
In Nov the white house will be lost

If I was left wing liberal I would not be mad at Rush or any conservative for that matter

YOUR LEADERSHIP FAILED
Any questions?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNqQx7sjoS8]Home Ownership and President Bush - YouTube[/ame]
 
this is why their party is dying.

they have to adopt LIES in place of the facts to retain their historically failed ideas.

That means they are now hitting the point where their entire outlook is based in the fantasy of their own lies
 
Feds sue banks over bad securities - FSU Voice - Fayetteville State University


In a bold move on Sept. 2, the Federal Housing Finance agency filed lawsuits against 17 banks for their alleged practice of fraudulently selling close to $200 billion in securities linked to subprime mortgages.

Several of the banks are major American financial institutions, who some economists say were nearly single-handedly responsible 2008's recession. Bank of America, Merrill Lynch & Co., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Goldman Sachs & Co., were among the banks listed in the FHFA's legal filings report.

A subprime mortgage is "a type of loan granted to individuals [or couples] with poor credit histories (often below 600), who, as a result of their deficient credit ratings, would not be able to qualify for conventional mortgages," according to Investopedia.com. These mortgages often have higher interest rates than traditional loans of the same type. And most commonly, they're adjustable rate mortgages, in which many individuals with poor credit do not understand.

Investopedia continues, "Many lenders were more liberal in granting these loans from 2004 to 2006 as a result of lower interest rates and high capital liquidity. Lenders sought additional profits through these higher risk loans, and they charged interest rates above prime in order to compensate for the additional risk they assumed. Consequently, once the rate of subprime mortgage foreclosures skyrocketed, many lenders experienced extreme financial difficulties, and even bankruptcy."

The 17 banks are being accused of participating in this unethical lending practice.

Un ethical?
Or illegal?
and GS does not loan money, there a Hedge fund, not a commercial bank
That has nothing to do with the problem and what the Dems did when they finally got power

Real estate values remain high
None of these events take place

Do you claim there was NO fraud in securities during these years?


REALLY?
 
Net capital rule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


On April 28, 2004, the SEC voted unanimously to permit the largest broker-dealers (i.e., those with "tentative net capital" of more than $5 billion) to apply for exemptions from this established "haircut" method.[5] Upon receiving SEC approval, those firms were permitted to use mathematical models to compute the haircuts on their securities based on international standards used by commercial banks.[6]

Since 2008, many commentators on the financial crisis of 2007-2009 have identified the 2004 rule change as an important cause of the crisis on the basis it permitted certain large investment banks (i.e., Bear Stearns, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley) to increase dramatically their leverage (i.e., the ratio of their debt or assets to their equity).[7] Financial reports filed by those companies show an increase in their leverage ratios from 2004 through 2007 (and into 2008), but financial reports filed by the same companies before 2004 show higher reported leverage ratios for four of the five firms in years before 2004.[8]
 
Bush and his SEC created this mess with their lack of implimentation of exsisting laws and creating new ways for the banks to LIE about what they were selling.

so many Rs have NO idea about which they speak
 
It took 12 years for the liberals to get the congress back (except the 01-02 senate when J Jeffers jumped ship)

8 years of solid lies about GWB in conjunction with the Credit bubble bursting (which was no fault of GWB) to create the perfect storm

In 4 years the house was lost
In Nov the white house will be lost

If I was left wing liberal I would not be mad at Rush or any conservative for that matter

YOUR LEADERSHIP FAILED
Any questions?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNqQx7sjoS8]Home Ownership and President Bush - YouTube[/ame]

Yea I got a few

1) what does that have to do with real estate value plummeting?
2) what does that have to do with person A loaning person B wealth on inflated and un seen at that time real estate values that were going to plummet?
3) what does that have to do with person A loaning person B wealth on information that was not true?
4) what does that have to do with person A loaning person B wealth on information that was a planned fabrication?
5) what does that have to do with securities being bundled up, sold as a highly rated mutual fund, that later becomes a highly rated POS?

In what part of that speech did GWB mandate any of this? The issue never has been re possession, the issue has allways been the inflated real estate values, record low interest rates and ARM that went from 4-8% and above in a very short time?

Root cause has nothing to do with GWB
 
Bush and his SEC created this mess with their lack of implimentation of exsisting laws and creating new ways for the banks to LIE about what they were selling.

so many Rs have NO idea about which they speak

What are you talking about?
The banks got hurt as much as the consumer did, except they got bailed out and the poor consumer who was stupid enough to purchase that 200,000 asset did not

Look I know people who had 400,000 homes with 2 incomes that had borrowed 300k on that asset
today those same people are up-side down in those loans
why?
The value of there asset plummeted as it did with the bank that held it as collateral

What does lying have to do with that?
 
The dupes say it was all Barney and F+F's fault, that's why, chump...

So when you say the Dems had two years of complete power, not 6 months, are you a liar or an brainwashed idiot?
 
why do you keep ignoring the cold hard documented evidence i keep giving you jrk?
 
what are you talking about?
Gramm Leech was repealed took place in the late 90s

What does of any of that have to do with the events of 209 thru 2010?
The credit bubble was no-ones fault but those who borrowed more than they could afford
and
Those who lent out more than they could get back

No one else s

It is against the law to lie on a credit app
It is against the law to loan money based on a lie on a credit app
That is called bank fraud

What does any of this have to do with +5 million jobs fewer than 08 and deficits in excess of 1 trillion dollars each year?

why did you not have the class to admitt you were wrong?
 
You failed completely on the facts and NEVER admitted it.

then you ignored cold hard documented FACTS in reply.

This is why your party is dying
 
I love how these Idiots pretend the banks loan money to anyone who asks for it
 
GRAMM Leach was never repealed was it hack?

Gramm

The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLB), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, (Pub.L. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338, enacted November 12, 1999) or the Citigroup Relief Act[1] is an act of the 106th United States Congress (1999–2001). It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company. With the passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies were allowed to consolidate. The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
 
You are such a fucking piece of shit as a person you cant bring yourself to admitt what clearly happened
 
what are you talking about?
Gramm Leech was repealed took place in the late 90s

What does of any of that have to do with the events of 209 thru 2010?
The credit bubble was no-ones fault but those who borrowed more than they could afford
and
Those who lent out more than they could get back

No one else s

It is against the law to lie on a credit app
It is against the law to loan money based on a lie on a credit app
That is called bank fraud

What does any of this have to do with +5 million jobs fewer than 08 and deficits in excess of 1 trillion dollars each year?

why did you not have the class to admitt you were wrong?

You knew so little about the subject you mixed up the names of the laws.

Now you cant even bring yourself to admitt your own OBVIOUS mistake.

This is why you people are so easy for the right to manipulate.

Your self important idiots with no morals
 

Forum List

Back
Top