Benghazi: Libyan Terrorists Got Arms From Obama Administration

[Wehrwolfen]

Benghazi: Libyan Terrorists Got Arms From Obama Administration​

Eurasia Review ^
09 December 2012
Jim Kouri

In spite of the threat of American weapons ending up in the hands of terrorist groups, President Barack Obama secretly approved an arms transfer to Libyan rebels through Qatar at the height of the rebellion against Moamar Khadhafi, a knowledgeable source noted on Friday.

However, American counterterrorists are discovering that some of those U.S. weapons ended up in the hands of radical Islamists including associates of al-Qaeda, according to a law enforcement source who trained police in the Middle East.

Some Americans who are retired from the military, as well as intelligence and law enforcement agencies, believe there should be an investigation into possible connections between the weapons provided by the Qataris back then and the attack that killed an American ambassador and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012.

During the months leading up to the terrorist attacks, the Obama administration worried about its part in helping to arm the Libyan rebels who were members of terrorist organizations especially so close to Election Day. (Could this be why BenghaziGate was hushed up and lied about by Obama and the MSM?)
Experts believe that Obama’s experience with arming Libyan rebels is why his administration is nervous about arming the rebels in Syria, where money and weapons are flowing in from Qatar and other countries. It’s widely believed that al-Qaeda in Iraq and other terrorist groups are active in the Syrian rebellion.

Countries such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar are reportedly supplying weapons and equipment to the Syrian rebels. But the Obama administration continues its refusal to directly arm the Syrian opposition, for fear that the weapons may end up in the hands of the more hard-line Islamist groups in the Arab country, said a source within federal law enforcement.



Read more:
Benghazi: Libyan Terrorists Got Arms From Obama Administration

 

[Lakhota]

Kim Kardashian's Cat Dies

 

[Avatar4321]

So Lakhota, Why does the fact that Obama provided weapons to Al Qaeda bother you that much?

 

[Lakhota]

Nope. Not at all.

 

[Avatar4321]

Nope. Not at all.

I asked why. It's obvious that it does bother you. Else why would you go into threads on the topic with completely irrelevant tripe that no one cares about?

 

[Lakhota]

Shit happens. Bush proved that.

 

[BlindBoo]

So what are they going to call this latest pseudo-scandel? Furious Benghazi-Gate?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

AQ and the Dems seem to have the same goals, that's why Dems don't care about the dead Ambassador or the lies

 

[WillowTree]

AQ and the Dems seem to have the same goals, that's why Dems don't care about the dead Ambassador or the lies

they izzzz just little bumps in bamie's road.

 

[Wehrwolfen]

Shit happens. Bush proved that.

[snip]
These were the words of President Clinton on the night of December 16, 1998 as he announced a four-day bombing campaign over Iraq. Only six weeks earlier, Clinton had signed the Iraq Liberation Act authorizing Saddam’s overthrow—an initiative supported unanimously in the Senate and by a margin of 360 to 38 in the House. “Iraqis deserve and desire freedom,” Clinton had declared. On the evening the bombs began to drop, Vice President Al Gore told CNN’s Larry King:

You allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons. How many people is he going to kill with such weapons? . . . We are not going to allow him to succeed. [emphasis added]​

[snip]
What these and other such statements remind us is that, by the time George Bush entered the White House in January 2001, the United States was already at war with Iraq, and in fact had been at war for a decade, ever since the first Gulf war in the early 1990’s. (This was literally the case, the end of hostilities in 1991 being merely a cease-fire and not a formal surrender followed by a peace treaty.) Not only that, but the diplomatic and military framework Bush inherited for neutralizing the Middle East’s most fearsome dictator had been approved by the United Nations.

[snip]
Saddam had the WMD know-how, as well as probable stockpiles, that terrorist groups like al Qaeda might want for future operations. Just weeks before 9/11, a privately sponsored exercise had simulated a smallpox attack on the United States. The results were chilling: more than three million people infected within two months, and one million dead. “Today,” declared the official report, “we are ill-equipped to prevent the dire consequences of a biological-weapon attack”—a conclusion that would cast a shadow of apprehension over the post-9/11 Defense Department, as dark as the shadow cast by the anthrax scare that gripped the country after five people received fatal doses in the mail and by the discovery during the invasion of Afghanistan that the Taliban had been experimenting with chemical weapons.

[snip]
In September 2002 the Senate virtually arm-twisted Bush into giving it time to pass a new and more specific resolution than the Clinton-era one authorizing regime change in Iraq. In ringing the tocsin, moreover, leading Democrats spoke at least as assertively as leading Republicans. One of them was Charles Schumer:

"Hussein’s vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons, and his present and potential future support for terrorist acts and organizations . . . make him a terrible danger to the people of the United States".​

Another was Hillary Clinton:

My position is very clear. The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein’s WMD’s.​

John Edwards was still another:

Every day [Saddam] gets closer to his long-term goal of nuclear capability.​

Howard Dean, then the governor of Vermont, was of a similar mind:

There’s no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat to the U.S. and our allies.​

But let's blame it all on President Bush. It's more than apparent Democrats are just as culpable as the Republicans for the war with Iraq and now facing intervention in Syria.

 

[Avatar4321]

Shit happens. Bush proved that.

Our government provided weapons to groups that are enemies to our nation and that's all you can say about it?

 

[Avatar4321]

So what are they going to call this latest pseudo-scandel? Furious Benghazi-Gate?

If Benghazi isn't a scandal, what the heck is?

 

[TNHarley]

F&F and Benghazi. Who cares right? The administration provided arms that killed OUR people on 2 different occasions. People like lakhota don't care, why should the rest of America care? When someone does, they get ridiculed for caring about their country. NEXT (heartless fucks)

 

[TNHarley]

So what are they going to call this latest pseudo-scandel? Furious Benghazi-Gate?

If Benghazi isn't a scandal, what the heck is?

Anything that does not involve obama

 

[Wehrwolfen]

So what are they going to call this latest pseudo-scandel? Furious Benghazi-Gate?

If Benghazi isn't a scandal, what the heck is?

Anything that does not involve obama

You're right there, except for the fact that Oblamer is up to his neck in the scandal. It was his order to stand down and it was his order to abandon Stevens and the CIA group in Benghazi. Had this been an operation that had gone wrong during the a Republican administration, wouldn't we all be still hearing the wailing and finger pointing at the Left's opposition?
Oblamer has to answer for this chicanery and above all blatantly lying to the American people.

 

[BlindBoo]

So what are they going to call this latest pseudo-scandel? Furious Benghazi-Gate?

If Benghazi isn't a scandal, what the heck is?

A terrorist attack on one of our newest outposts in a lawless area of Lybia.

The pseudo-scandel is a creation of the rabid rights echo chamber.

A chance for the GOP candidate to show his true colors?

A change for McCain to get Kerry out of the Senate?

 

[BlindBoo]

F&F and Benghazi. Who cares right? The administration provided arms that killed OUR people on 2 different occasions. People like lakhota don't care, why should the rest of America care? When someone does, they get ridiculed for caring about their country. NEXT (heartless fucks)

F&F didn't kill anyone. The border agent was kill as part of the failed Drug war. The ambassodor was killed by smoke.

 

[DiamondDave]

Shit happens. Bush proved that.

Our government provided weapons to groups that are enemies to our nation and that's all you can say about it?

It is the way of the progressive Obamabot sheeple

 

[Wehrwolfen]

F&F and Benghazi. Who cares right? The administration provided arms that killed OUR people on 2 different occasions. People like lakhota don't care, why should the rest of America care? When someone does, they get ridiculed for caring about their country. NEXT (heartless fucks)

F&F didn't kill anyone. The border agent was kill as part of the failed Drug war. The ambassodor was killed by smoke.

Therefore according to you "Fairy Dust" killed Brian Terrry, Jamie Zapata in and around the Mexican border and Christopher Stevens along with the three others in Benghazi

 

[BlindBoo]

F&F and Benghazi. Who cares right? The administration provided arms that killed OUR people on 2 different occasions. People like lakhota don't care, why should the rest of America care? When someone does, they get ridiculed for caring about their country. NEXT (heartless fucks)

F&F didn't kill anyone. The border agent was kill as part of the failed Drug war. The ambassodor was killed by smoke.

Therefore according to you "Fairy Dust" killed Brian Terrry, Jamie Zapata in and around the Mexican border and Christopher Stevens along with the three others in Benghazi

Nope KIA by terrorist and armed drug bandits. One of the ATF policies had them shooting bean bags at armed bandits. That policy is more directly responsible for their deaths that the failed gun walking operation.

The rabid right only care in as much as they can use the death to denigrate the current administration. Looks like America didn't fall for their shit however.