Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How is firing Mueller obstruction? The government run media keeps claiming his firing would be obstruction. That is bullshit and you and others accept it. Had he fired Meuller, he would have been replaced and the investigation continued.Mueller's report laid out multiple episodes where Trump directed others to attempt to influence or curtail Mueller's investigation, and those obstruction attempts failed only because the persons around Trump refused to follow his orders.The left will never believe in the idea of innocent until proven guilty because if they did they would have to admit that they hate Trump for no other reason then blind hate.
The left wanted to be lied to by their handlers, they wanted any excuse to hate and they were given it.
Were Trump's requests evidence of attempted obstruction or were the actions of his subordinates traitorous?
I understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?Barr misrepresented the Mueller report. The proof is right there but the Trumpbots are too blinded by their unquestioning love for the president to acknowledge it.
What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
don't you understand?
Yet you don’t think Hillary would welcome Russian help. LOLI understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?Barr misrepresented the Mueller report. The proof is right there but the Trumpbots are too blinded by their unquestioning love for the president to acknowledge it.
What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
don't you understand?
I understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?Barr misrepresented the Mueller report. The proof is right there but the Trumpbots are too blinded by their unquestioning love for the president to acknowledge it.
What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
don't you understand?
Yet you don’t think Hillary would welcome Russian help. LOLI understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?Barr misrepresented the Mueller report. The proof is right there but the Trumpbots are too blinded by their unquestioning love for the president to acknowledge it.
What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
don't you understand?
Hillary hired Steele, her man in Moscow, to generate the phony dossier. Then used it with help from the FBI to entrap Trump and get Obama to approve spying on the Trump campaign.
Hillary paid $1 million for the dossier. So there goes your opinion.Yet you don’t think Hillary would welcome Russian help. LOLI understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?Barr misrepresented the Mueller report. The proof is right there but the Trumpbots are too blinded by their unquestioning love for the president to acknowledge it.
What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
don't you understand?
Hillary hired Steele, her man in Moscow, to generate the phony dossier. Then used it with help from the FBI to entrap Trump and get Obama to approve spying on the Trump campaign.
Even if your bullshit story was true the Steele dossier was not a Russian intelligence op and was never used by the Clinton campaign. Trump delighted in the Wikileaks dumps of hacked emails and used them without a trace of shame that he was benefiting from an espionage operation directed against America.
The ends rarely justify the means. This collusion thing would have never been a question if Trump had denounced the leaks, not used them and told Russia to butt out but he didn't. It's quite possible Trump could not have won without Russian help but what did he win? A presidency clouded by suspicion and hobbled by investigations.Hillary paid $1 million for the dossier. So there goes your opinion.Yet you don’t think Hillary would welcome Russian help. LOLI understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?Barr misrepresented the Mueller report. The proof is right there but the Trumpbots are too blinded by their unquestioning love for the president to acknowledge it.
What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
don't you understand?
Hillary hired Steele, her man in Moscow, to generate the phony dossier. Then used it with help from the FBI to entrap Trump and get Obama to approve spying on the Trump campaign.
Even if your bullshit story was true the Steele dossier was not a Russian intelligence op and was never used by the Clinton campaign. Trump delighted in the Wikileaks dumps of hacked emails and used them without a trace of shame that he was benefiting from an espionage operation directed against America.
So what if Trump was delighted about Wikileaks? I suppose you think being delighted means collusion.
Total bullshit.The ends rarely justify the means. This collusion thing would have never been a question if Trump had denounced the leaks, not used them and told Russia to butt out but he didn't. It's quite possible Trump could not have won without Russian help but what did he win? A presidency clouded by suspicion and hobbled by investigations.Hillary paid $1 million for the dossier. So there goes your opinion.Yet you don’t think Hillary would welcome Russian help. LOLI understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
don't you understand?
Hillary hired Steele, her man in Moscow, to generate the phony dossier. Then used it with help from the FBI to entrap Trump and get Obama to approve spying on the Trump campaign.
Even if your bullshit story was true the Steele dossier was not a Russian intelligence op and was never used by the Clinton campaign. Trump delighted in the Wikileaks dumps of hacked emails and used them without a trace of shame that he was benefiting from an espionage operation directed against America.
So what if Trump was delighted about Wikileaks? I suppose you think being delighted means collusion.
Good grief. You have the intellect of an eggplant.Barr is following the law, his quote from above matches the actual quote,
"(T)he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian Government in its election interference activities. "
Mueller's job was to investigate and charge or not charge, he did not charge, that means:
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
AG Barr will investigate the origin of the Mueller investigation, and indict the deep state actors for their illegal coup attempts.
Obviously you never bothered to read the report. There is no such thing as collusion, as said in the report.
, because only conspiracy is a crime. The Tramp and his campaign conspired with Russians, but they lied and deleted emails, so Mueller could not prove it.
Hey! I love eggplant!Good grief. You have the intellect of an eggplant.Barr is following the law, his quote from above matches the actual quote,
"(T)he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian Government in its election interference activities. "
Mueller's job was to investigate and charge or not charge, he did not charge, that means:
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
AG Barr will investigate the origin of the Mueller investigation, and indict the deep state actors for their illegal coup attempts.
Obviously you never bothered to read the report. There is no such thing as collusion, as said in the report.
, because only conspiracy is a crime. The Tramp and his campaign conspired with Russians, but they lied and deleted emails, so Mueller could not prove it.
/—-/ So Barr should resign because nothing happened."The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian Government and the Trump Campaign. Although the investigation established that the Russian Government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen trough Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian Government in its election interference activities. "
Barr misrepresented the above as
(T)he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian Government in its election interference activities. "
Barr needs to resign
Hillary Clinton was never "my girl" and is not the president. Right now we have a president that is "fucked" and he has no one to blame but himself. The questions about Russian collusion were there before the election. Only a fool would think they could make something like that go away. Why didn't someone tell him that the cost of winning dirty will be more than he is willing to pay?Total bullshit.The ends rarely justify the means. This collusion thing would have never been a question if Trump had denounced the leaks, not used them and told Russia to butt out but he didn't. It's quite possible Trump could not have won without Russian help but what did he win? A presidency clouded by suspicion and hobbled by investigations.Hillary paid $1 million for the dossier. So there goes your opinion.Yet you don’t think Hillary would welcome Russian help. LOLI understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?
Hillary hired Steele, her man in Moscow, to generate the phony dossier. Then used it with help from the FBI to entrap Trump and get Obama to approve spying on the Trump campaign.
Even if your bullshit story was true the Steele dossier was not a Russian intelligence op and was never used by the Clinton campaign. Trump delighted in the Wikileaks dumps of hacked emails and used them without a trace of shame that he was benefiting from an espionage operation directed against America.
So what if Trump was delighted about Wikileaks? I suppose you think being delighted means collusion.
Wikileaks exposed corruption by your girl. That is what the press is supposed to do. Why would Trump denounce corruption?
Think man. Think. Stop consuming government run media. It makes you stupid.
Damn that is delusional. Mueller worked feverishly to get Donnie and he couldn’t. Give it up.Hillary Clinton was never "my girl" and is not the president. Right now we have a president that is "fucked" and he has no one to blame but himself. The questions about Russian collusion were there before the election. Only a fool would think they could make something like that go away. Why didn't someone tell him that the cost of winning dirty will be more than he is willing to pay?Total bullshit.The ends rarely justify the means. This collusion thing would have never been a question if Trump had denounced the leaks, not used them and told Russia to butt out but he didn't. It's quite possible Trump could not have won without Russian help but what did he win? A presidency clouded by suspicion and hobbled by investigations.Hillary paid $1 million for the dossier. So there goes your opinion.Yet you don’t think Hillary would welcome Russian help. LOL
Hillary hired Steele, her man in Moscow, to generate the phony dossier. Then used it with help from the FBI to entrap Trump and get Obama to approve spying on the Trump campaign.
Even if your bullshit story was true the Steele dossier was not a Russian intelligence op and was never used by the Clinton campaign. Trump delighted in the Wikileaks dumps of hacked emails and used them without a trace of shame that he was benefiting from an espionage operation directed against America.
So what if Trump was delighted about Wikileaks? I suppose you think being delighted means collusion.
Wikileaks exposed corruption by your girl. That is what the press is supposed to do. Why would Trump denounce corruption?
Think man. Think. Stop consuming government run media. It makes you stupid.
Criticizing the president for his actions concerning Russian interference in our election is legitimate as hell. I am not claiming collusion as it is defined by the justice department, I am calling the president an idiot for doing nothing to avoid the appearance of open coordination with a Russian intelligence operation while clearly benefiting from it. He brought all this on himself.Damn that is delusional. Mueller worked feverishly to get Donnie and he couldn’t. Give it up.Hillary Clinton was never "my girl" and is not the president. Right now we have a president that is "fucked" and he has no one to blame but himself. The questions about Russian collusion were there before the election. Only a fool would think they could make something like that go away. Why didn't someone tell him that the cost of winning dirty will be more than he is willing to pay?Total bullshit.The ends rarely justify the means. This collusion thing would have never been a question if Trump had denounced the leaks, not used them and told Russia to butt out but he didn't. It's quite possible Trump could not have won without Russian help but what did he win? A presidency clouded by suspicion and hobbled by investigations.Hillary paid $1 million for the dossier. So there goes your opinion.Even if your bullshit story was true the Steele dossier was not a Russian intelligence op and was never used by the Clinton campaign. Trump delighted in the Wikileaks dumps of hacked emails and used them without a trace of shame that he was benefiting from an espionage operation directed against America.
So what if Trump was delighted about Wikileaks? I suppose you think being delighted means collusion.
Wikileaks exposed corruption by your girl. That is what the press is supposed to do. Why would Trump denounce corruption?
Think man. Think. Stop consuming government run media. It makes you stupid.
There is plenty to criticize Trump for. Try sticking to legitimate criticism rather than made up criticism.
Read the dossier that got this whole thing started. It is an obvious fabrication designed to harm Trump. It was used by Hillary to get Obama to spy on Trump and try to entrap him, using the FBI.Criticizing the president for his actions concerning Russian interference in our election is legitimate as hell. I am not claiming collusion as it is defined by the justice department, I am calling the president an idiot for doing nothing to avoid the appearance of open coordination with a Russian intelligence operation while clearly benefiting from it. He brought all this on himself.Damn that is delusional. Mueller worked feverishly to get Donnie and he couldn’t. Give it up.Hillary Clinton was never "my girl" and is not the president. Right now we have a president that is "fucked" and he has no one to blame but himself. The questions about Russian collusion were there before the election. Only a fool would think they could make something like that go away. Why didn't someone tell him that the cost of winning dirty will be more than he is willing to pay?Total bullshit.The ends rarely justify the means. This collusion thing would have never been a question if Trump had denounced the leaks, not used them and told Russia to butt out but he didn't. It's quite possible Trump could not have won without Russian help but what did he win? A presidency clouded by suspicion and hobbled by investigations.Hillary paid $1 million for the dossier. So there goes your opinion.
So what if Trump was delighted about Wikileaks? I suppose you think being delighted means collusion.
Wikileaks exposed corruption by your girl. That is what the press is supposed to do. Why would Trump denounce corruption?
Think man. Think. Stop consuming government run media. It makes you stupid.
There is plenty to criticize Trump for. Try sticking to legitimate criticism rather than made up criticism.
The ends rarely justify the means. This collusion thing would have never been a question if Trump had denounced the leaks, not used them and told Russia to butt out but he didn't. It's quite possible Trump could not have won without Russian help but what did he win? A presidency clouded by suspicion and hobbled by investigations.Hillary paid $1 million for the dossier. So there goes your opinion.Yet you don’t think Hillary would welcome Russian help. LOLI understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
don't you understand?
Hillary hired Steele, her man in Moscow, to generate the phony dossier. Then used it with help from the FBI to entrap Trump and get Obama to approve spying on the Trump campaign.
Even if your bullshit story was true the Steele dossier was not a Russian intelligence op and was never used by the Clinton campaign. Trump delighted in the Wikileaks dumps of hacked emails and used them without a trace of shame that he was benefiting from an espionage operation directed against America.
So what if Trump was delighted about Wikileaks? I suppose you think being delighted means collusion.
If the Steele Dossier had never been prepared we would be right here in the same place. Wondering what the hell happened with a president that seems to love Putin way too much.Read the dossier that got this whole thing started. It is an obvious fabrication designed to harm Trump. It was used by Hillary to get Obama to spy on Trump and try to entrap him, using the FBI.Criticizing the president for his actions concerning Russian interference in our election is legitimate as hell. I am not claiming collusion as it is defined by the justice department, I am calling the president an idiot for doing nothing to avoid the appearance of open coordination with a Russian intelligence operation while clearly benefiting from it. He brought all this on himself.Damn that is delusional. Mueller worked feverishly to get Donnie and he couldn’t. Give it up.Hillary Clinton was never "my girl" and is not the president. Right now we have a president that is "fucked" and he has no one to blame but himself. The questions about Russian collusion were there before the election. Only a fool would think they could make something like that go away. Why didn't someone tell him that the cost of winning dirty will be more than he is willing to pay?Total bullshit.The ends rarely justify the means. This collusion thing would have never been a question if Trump had denounced the leaks, not used them and told Russia to butt out but he didn't. It's quite possible Trump could not have won without Russian help but what did he win? A presidency clouded by suspicion and hobbled by investigations.
Wikileaks exposed corruption by your girl. That is what the press is supposed to do. Why would Trump denounce corruption?
Think man. Think. Stop consuming government run media. It makes you stupid.
There is plenty to criticize Trump for. Try sticking to legitimate criticism rather than made up criticism.
If only the left would stick to logical and legitimate criticism of Donnie. There is plenty of it and it is drowned out by this bullshit story.
One thing for sure, the government run media has been exposed as nothing more than propaganda, by this mueller investigation.
I understand you will never explore the question any further than Barr's white wash job. While they could not prove formal collusion the report makes it clear that the Trump campaign welcomed Russia's help. The end result is the same as collusion. There was definitely obstruction of justice but Mueller following Justice dept. guidelines lacks the authority to indict. Barr didn't say that did he?Barr misrepresented the Mueller report. The proof is right there but the Trumpbots are too blinded by their unquestioning love for the president to acknowledge it.
What part of
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
don't you understand?
It was Mueller's job to indict or not indict, he did NOT INDICT. End of story. If the House wants to pursue impeachment, go for it. They won't, its more beneficial for them to keep whining about the "Trump Tower Meeting" and the almost obstruction issues. That strategy will fall apart when Barr indicts the "investigators" for illegal surveillance and their unsuccessful coup attempts.
Good grief. You have the intellect of an eggplant.Barr is following the law, his quote from above matches the actual quote,
"(T)he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian Government in its election interference activities. "
Mueller's job was to investigate and charge or not charge, he did not charge, that means:
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION
AG Barr will investigate the origin of the Mueller investigation, and indict the deep state actors for their illegal coup attempts.
Obviously you never bothered to read the report. There is no such thing as collusion, as said in the report.
, because only conspiracy is a crime. The Tramp and his campaign conspired with Russians, but they lied and deleted emails, so Mueller could not prove it.
