/——-/ As I said, these are crimes and should be investigated but that’s not why Mueller was supposed to be investigating.Then yes, you are confusing yourself. You asked what the charges against Manafort had to do with the original intent of the investigation. The other poster wondered why anyone should care, and if you cared about the original intent of Ken Starr's investigation when he was looking into sexcapades in the Oval Office. Your odd response was to claim that the sex with an underling was a crime. This response is odd, because the charges against Manafort are also crimes. And very serious ones, at that./——/ I’m responding to the libtard that said Clinton just did kinky sex. It was a crimeAs is money laundering and loan fraud. I think you might be confusing yourself.Because that was a real crime (Fed officer sex with a subordinate