Bags Of Excrement

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Eleanor Holmes Norton says everything she has to say in one sentence and it’s ugly:

. . . “My interest is not in what happened, my interest is in what should happen!”​


Hannity Rips Into Eleanor Holmes Norton: You Didn’t Read Ferguson Evidence?!
by Josh Feldman | 10:29 pm, December 4th, 2014

Hannity Rips Into Eleanor Holmes Norton You Didn 8217 t Read Ferguson Evidence Mediaite

Hannity should have asked Norton if she understood the First Amendment. Norton and her kind never address evidence, facts, governance, legislation, the Constitution, or anything except their own moral certainty. Whenever their lies fall on deaf ears they always fall back on their moral view. Incidentally, Norton and the rest of those who cannot get what they want through the legislative process and their judges they all use the same moral technique used by frustrated priests from the past with variations of liberalism’s moral superiority.

There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why... I dream of things that never were, and ask why not? Robert Kennedy

Hillary Clinton put her own twist on moral horseshit to justify praising the late Walter Cronkite for betraying the country’s independence:



On top of all of the garbage dirty little moralist preachers have been spouting for as long as they have been trying to replace the Constitution with themselves, Eleanor Holmes Norton was given the biggest boost imaginable by that moral piece of garbage in the White House. He has been trying to set up himself as the nation’s moral compass since he first campaigned. I’m certain that his plan was formulated way back when he was a street-hustling community organizer. In fact, the media made it possible for everything the Chicago sewer rat did to this country on the day media mouths turned Saul Alinsky’s community organizing into a noble profession.

Today, the media is doing contortions trying to keep from calling their creation’s moral guidance from being laughed out of town along with the presidency. I just cannot see how any future president can ever again get away with playing the moral leader game. That is the one good thing Constitution-lovers can thank the Chicago street punk for.

And never forget that riots and violence were as much a part of the Civil Rights Movement as it is today, yet I’ve not heard one talking head remind everybody that violence and race riots were the threat behind MLK’s bullshit Dream Speech. The entire scam was designed and executed to show that the black race is morally superior. Who the hell needs laws or a constitution when they have to bow down to moral leaders!


Incidentally, I, too, have a dream. Every time a future president attempts to govern with moral authority instead of the Constitution and laws the White House lawn should be bombarded with bags of excrement. What the hell, if burning the flag is protected free speech it must be constitutionally protected free speech to throw bags of shit on the White House lawn.

Parenthetically, every moral scum bag is free to practice their religion of choice with their own kind. They are NOT free to force their moral worldview on anybody else. As far as I am concerned Norton and her kind can shove their moral compass where the sun never shines.

Finally, the record shows that the vast majority of black Americans got nothing from the Civil Rights Movement. For decades black men have been killing black men —— as well as individual blacks randomly killing whites whenever the mood moved them, yet today’s black violence is once again being justified because a white cop defended himself in almost every incident. The fact is that Norton and “da reverends’ like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, etc. are agitating more violence in order to revive the Civil Rights Movement so they can acquire more special privileges and TAX DOLLARS for themselves and to hell with the rest of the blacks who are not going to end up with high paying employment in government, in the education industry, or in any heavily subsidized industry. Those jobs are reserved for ambitious blacks who suck up to white liberals.
 
Eleanor Holmes Norton says everything she has to say in one sentence and it’s ugly:

. . . “My interest is not in what happened, my interest is in what should happen!”​


Hannity Rips Into Eleanor Holmes Norton: You Didn’t Read Ferguson Evidence?!
by Josh Feldman | 10:29 pm, December 4th, 2014

Hannity Rips Into Eleanor Holmes Norton You Didn 8217 t Read Ferguson Evidence Mediaite

Hannity should have asked Norton if she understood the First Amendment. Norton and her kind never address evidence, facts, governance, legislation, the Constitution, or anything except their own moral certainty. Whenever their lies fall on deaf ears they always fall back on their moral view. Incidentally, Norton and the rest of those who cannot get what they want through the legislative process and their judges they all use the same moral technique used by frustrated priests from the past with variations of liberalism’s moral superiority.

There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why... I dream of things that never were, and ask why not? Robert Kennedy

Hillary Clinton put her own twist on moral horseshit to justify praising the late Walter Cronkite for betraying the country’s independence:



On top of all of the garbage dirty little moralist preachers have been spouting for as long as they have been trying to replace the Constitution with themselves, Eleanor Holmes Norton was given the biggest boost imaginable by that moral piece of garbage in the White House. He has been trying to set up himself as the nation’s moral compass since he first campaigned. I’m certain that his plan was formulated way back when he was a street-hustling community organizer. In fact, the media made it possible for everything the Chicago sewer rat did to this country on the day media mouths turned Saul Alinsky’s community organizing into a noble profession.

Today, the media is doing contortions trying to keep from calling their creation’s moral guidance from being laughed out of town along with the presidency. I just cannot see how any future president can ever again get away with playing the moral leader game. That is the one good thing Constitution-lovers can thank the Chicago street punk for.

And never forget that riots and violence were as much a part of the Civil Rights Movement as it is today, yet I’ve not heard one talking head remind everybody that violence and race riots were the threat behind MLK’s bullshit Dream Speech. The entire scam was designed and executed to show that the black race is morally superior. Who the hell needs laws or a constitution when they have to bow down to moral leaders!


Incidentally, I, too, have a dream. Every time a future president attempts to govern with moral authority instead of the Constitution and laws the White House lawn should be bombarded with bags of excrement. What the hell, if burning the flag is protected free speech it must be constitutionally protected free speech to throw bags of shit on the White House lawn.

Parenthetically, every moral scum bag is free to practice their religion of choice with their own kind. They are NOT free to force their moral worldview on anybody else. As far as I am concerned Norton and her kind can shove their moral compass where the sun never shines.

Finally, the record shows that the vast majority of black Americans got nothing from the Civil Rights Movement. For decades black men have been killing black men —— as well as individual blacks randomly killing whites whenever the mood moved them, yet today’s black violence is once again being justified because a white cop defended himself in almost every incident. The fact is that Norton and “da reverends’ like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, etc. are agitating more violence in order to revive the Civil Rights Movement so they can acquire more special privileges and TAX DOLLARS for themselves and to hell with the rest of the blacks who are not going to end up with high paying employment in government, in the education industry, or in any heavily subsidized industry. Those jobs are reserved for ambitious blacks who suck up to white liberals.

Norton's comments should be on billboards across the country. And Clintons's speech about showing empathy towards the enemy should be the message on Christmas cards to the military stationed in the Mid-East. Bet they'd get a big kick out of that gem.
 
Eleanor Holmes Norton says everything she has to say in one sentence and it’s ugly:

. . . “My interest is not in what happened, my interest is in what should happen!”​


Hannity Rips Into Eleanor Holmes Norton: You Didn’t Read Ferguson Evidence?!
by Josh Feldman | 10:29 pm, December 4th, 2014

Hannity Rips Into Eleanor Holmes Norton You Didn 8217 t Read Ferguson Evidence Mediaite

Hannity should have asked Norton if she understood the First Amendment. Norton and her kind never address evidence, facts, governance, legislation, the Constitution, or anything except their own moral certainty. Whenever their lies fall on deaf ears they always fall back on their moral view. Incidentally, Norton and the rest of those who cannot get what they want through the legislative process and their judges they all use the same moral technique used by frustrated priests from the past with variations of liberalism’s moral superiority.

There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why... I dream of things that never were, and ask why not? Robert Kennedy

Hillary Clinton put her own twist on moral horseshit to justify praising the late Walter Cronkite for betraying the country’s independence:



On top of all of the garbage dirty little moralist preachers have been spouting for as long as they have been trying to replace the Constitution with themselves, Eleanor Holmes Norton was given the biggest boost imaginable by that moral piece of garbage in the White House. He has been trying to set up himself as the nation’s moral compass since he first campaigned. I’m certain that his plan was formulated way back when he was a street-hustling community organizer. In fact, the media made it possible for everything the Chicago sewer rat did to this country on the day media mouths turned Saul Alinsky’s community organizing into a noble profession.

Today, the media is doing contortions trying to keep from calling their creation’s moral guidance from being laughed out of town along with the presidency. I just cannot see how any future president can ever again get away with playing the moral leader game. That is the one good thing Constitution-lovers can thank the Chicago street punk for.

And never forget that riots and violence were as much a part of the Civil Rights Movement as it is today, yet I’ve not heard one talking head remind everybody that violence and race riots were the threat behind MLK’s bullshit Dream Speech. The entire scam was designed and executed to show that the black race is morally superior. Who the hell needs laws or a constitution when they have to bow down to moral leaders!


Incidentally, I, too, have a dream. Every time a future president attempts to govern with moral authority instead of the Constitution and laws the White House lawn should be bombarded with bags of excrement. What the hell, if burning the flag is protected free speech it must be constitutionally protected free speech to throw bags of shit on the White House lawn.

Parenthetically, every moral scum bag is free to practice their religion of choice with their own kind. They are NOT free to force their moral worldview on anybody else. As far as I am concerned Norton and her kind can shove their moral compass where the sun never shines.

Finally, the record shows that the vast majority of black Americans got nothing from the Civil Rights Movement. For decades black men have been killing black men —— as well as individual blacks randomly killing whites whenever the mood moved them, yet today’s black violence is once again being justified because a white cop defended himself in almost every incident. The fact is that Norton and “da reverends’ like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, etc. are agitating more violence in order to revive the Civil Rights Movement so they can acquire more special privileges and TAX DOLLARS for themselves and to hell with the rest of the blacks who are not going to end up with high paying employment in government, in the education industry, or in any heavily subsidized industry. Those jobs are reserved for ambitious blacks who suck up to white liberals.

Norton's comments should be on billboards across the country. And Clintons's speech about showing empathy towards the enemy should be the message on Christmas cards to the military stationed in the Mid-East. Bet they'd get a big kick out of that gem.

RNC should play her empathy with the enemy speech every time another American is beheaded or murdered by a Muslim.
 
Star Parker’s article smashes the problem with a sledge hammer. One sentence might get lost among the other good stuff in the piece. This is exactly what the First Amendment was designed to prevent:

Moral relativism does not neutralize the moral marketplace. It replaces one set of values with another.

EEOC: A distortion of just government
Posted By Star Parker On 12/05/2014 @ 6:51 pm

EEOC A distortion of just government
 
What in the fuck is wrong with Liberals' brains? :dunno:

To Mr. H.: My guess.

They accumulated so much unconstitutional governmental funding since the 1930s their religion, Socialism/Communism, is rotting their brains out from within.
 
Liberal/progressive/commie/pinko/Democrats value "feelings" over results. To them "Intentions" are more important than consequences.
 
Allow a single tear to trickle down your cheek and drop onto the sleeve of your pale yellow golf shirt, fellow white Americans, for the day that you feared has come. I'm not talking about the cancellation of the U.S. Open, though that is certainly a blow for whites. I'm talking about the very death of your proud but pale race.

For hundreds of years, whites have boldly dominated American cultural and sociopolitical life, using tools as ingenious and disparate as poll taxes, the John Birch Society, American Bandstand, and Tang. But the demographics winds are changing. We already know that whites are projected to become a minority— in this very country that your ancestors stole, and founded— in the year 2043. Perhaps you thought that meant that you could relax, at the country club, maybe while drinking a nice Arnold Palmer (which, Armando, will you be a good amigo and fetch me? Thanks much!) for the next 30 years? Hardly, my friends. The beginning of your end is already here.
 
Allow a single tear to trickle down your cheek and drop onto the sleeve of your pale yellow golf shirt, fellow white Americans, for the day that you feared has come. I'm not talking about the cancellation of the U.S. Open, though that is certainly a blow for whites. I'm talking about the very death of your proud but pale race.

For hundreds of years, whites have boldly dominated American cultural and sociopolitical life, using tools as ingenious and disparate as poll taxes, the John Birch Society, American Bandstand, and Tang. But the demographics winds are changing. We already know that whites are projected to become a minority— in this very country that your ancestors stole, and founded— in the year 2043. Perhaps you thought that meant that you could relax, at the country club, maybe while drinking a nice Arnold Palmer (which, Armando, will you be a good amigo and fetch me? Thanks much!) for the next 30 years? Hardly, my friends. The beginning of your end is already here.
 
Eleanor Holmes Norton says everything she has to say in one sentence and it’s ugly:

. . . “My interest is not in what happened, my interest is in what should happen!”

I guess walking away is the way it should happen:

 

Forum List

Back
Top