Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page was “cooperative” and "credible" in a closed-door session Friday with select House committee members that lasted nearly five hours.
U.S. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., had been among Page’s harshest critics heading into the session, but he said her cooperation “speaks well of her,” according to the Hill. Lisa Page 'cooperative,' 'credible,' lawmakers say after 5-hour closed-door session
Did loverboys terrible performance testifying spark this? Desire to try to salvage career? IS this the first crack in conspirators silence?
How are you not getting this Ray? Yes there was bias in the sense that they didn’t like Trump... so what?! Their work was reviewed and nothing improper was found more than “bad perception” which is why mueller took him off the case.No, I think people do their jobs and also have political opinions. It was investigated by the IG and no bias was seen in the work product.Yeah they were bias, so what?! It wasn’t like they knew trump personally or had a conflict of interest, they just thought he was an idiot along with most of America. Do you think every cop and detective has zero opinion about the subjects of their investigations? As long as their work product is by the book, as the IG concluded, then what’s the big deal?by their own texts they were biased....she must be smart enough to know this where he wasn't.
The big deal is Strokeoff was the one who interviewed Hillary in the email scandal. If he has a bias for her, don't you think that would have altered his questioning and reporting of answers?
There was definitely bias, and the IG is just as corrupt as the FBI. HTF can anybody read those texts and say there was no bias? Ray Charles could see the blatant bias.
I hate to break it to you but pretty much everybody in the world is bias, that doesn’t mean they are corrupt, liars or unable to execute their jobs
Right and as a result Pete was demoted and there was an investigation to see if actions were taken to try and stop trump from being elected.... NOTHING WAS FOUND. In fact many details that could have hurt trump during the election were kept secret and not exposed. How does that work with your narrative?They thought he was a joke, so did the majority of the voting public. Not liking a person and haveing personal history with somebody are two different things.See in that case there is a legit conflict through association. Did these FBI agents know Trump or have a history with him?God you are a sucker. What choice did Mueller have than to take him off the case?
So a 14 year old girl accuses you of sexually molesting her. The detective in your city is a guy you went to high school with and he hated your guts every single day; still hates you until this day. You're okay with him making the case against you?
Talk about bad comparisons
Did they hate him just as much as if they did? Read the texts to answer that question.
But let’s dig a layer deeper. Let’s say they hated Trump... did they do anything illegal with the investigation? What’s the issue? You scared that they might be critical and skeptical of him while they investigate?
Their messages conveyed that they would do anything to stop Trump from being elected, and if they failed at that, do whatever they can (insurance policy) to get him thrown out of office. It doesn't have to be illegal to be inappropriate. You don't let investigators who hate a subject to investigate them.
There was an FBI investigation into Russia election meddling and collusion with the Trump campaign since July of 2016. That’s before the election and if these agents really wanted to impact the election and hurt Trump they could have simply leaked details. Instead the national media was obsessed with locking hillary up and email servers, and Comey announcing all kinds of details about that investigation that her opponents pounced on.Then why didn’t they leak about the Trump investigation? It surely would have hurt himRight and as a result Pete was demoted and there was an investigation to see if actions were taken to try and stop trump from being elected.... NOTHING WAS FOUND. In fact many details that could have hurt trump during the election were kept secret and not exposed. How does that work with your narrative?They thought he was a joke, so did the majority of the voting public. Not liking a person and haveing personal history with somebody are two different things.
But let’s dig a layer deeper. Let’s say they hated Trump... did they do anything illegal with the investigation? What’s the issue? You scared that they might be critical and skeptical of him while they investigate?
Their messages conveyed that they would do anything to stop Trump from being elected, and if they failed at that, do whatever they can (insurance policy) to get him thrown out of office. It doesn't have to be illegal to be inappropriate. You don't let investigators who hate a subject to investigate them.
This jerk off was in charge of the investigation. His favorite was Hillary who he interviewed. HTF do you prove he was not aggressive enough during the investigation as he otherwise would have been for anybody else?
If he and his whore had any ability to change the election or circumstances afterwards, they would have done it.
There was nothing to leak. I have no idea what you're talking about.
If they consensus was to not recommend indicting Clinton then why would they use criminal language? It should be a mystery why the wording was changed.How are you not getting this Ray? Yes there was bias in the sense that they didn’t like Trump... so what?! Their work was reviewed and nothing improper was found more than “bad perception” which is why mueller took him off the case.No, I think people do their jobs and also have political opinions. It was investigated by the IG and no bias was seen in the work product.Yeah they were bias, so what?! It wasn’t like they knew trump personally or had a conflict of interest, they just thought he was an idiot along with most of America. Do you think every cop and detective has zero opinion about the subjects of their investigations? As long as their work product is by the book, as the IG concluded, then what’s the big deal?
The big deal is Strokeoff was the one who interviewed Hillary in the email scandal. If he has a bias for her, don't you think that would have altered his questioning and reporting of answers?
There was definitely bias, and the IG is just as corrupt as the FBI. HTF can anybody read those texts and say there was no bias? Ray Charles could see the blatant bias.
I hate to break it to you but pretty much everybody in the world is bias, that doesn’t mean they are corrupt, liars or unable to execute their jobs
Than why did Stroke change the wording in the report from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless"?
That along with his texts got him shit canned from the Mewler investigation and demoted to human resources.
Even CNN admits it.
FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey description of Clinton - CNNPolitics
Just don’t want to keep misspelling his last namePete? Sounds like you must know him...Right and as a result Pete was demoted and there was an investigation to see if actions were taken to try and stop trump from being elected.... NOTHING WAS FOUND. In fact many details that could have hurt trump during the election were kept secret and not exposed. How does that work with your narrative?They thought he was a joke, so did the majority of the voting public. Not liking a person and haveing personal history with somebody are two different things.See in that case there is a legit conflict through association. Did these FBI agents know Trump or have a history with him?
Talk about bad comparisons
Did they hate him just as much as if they did? Read the texts to answer that question.
But let’s dig a layer deeper. Let’s say they hated Trump... did they do anything illegal with the investigation? What’s the issue? You scared that they might be critical and skeptical of him while they investigate?
Their messages conveyed that they would do anything to stop Trump from being elected, and if they failed at that, do whatever they can (insurance policy) to get him thrown out of office. It doesn't have to be illegal to be inappropriate. You don't let investigators who hate a subject to investigate them.
There was an FBI investigation into Russia election meddling and collusion with the Trump campaign since July of 2016. That’s before the election and if these agents really wanted to impact the election and hurt Trump they could have simply leaked details. Instead the national media was obsessed with locking hillary up and email servers, and Comey announcing all kinds of details about that investigation that her opponents pounced on.Then why didn’t they leak about the Trump investigation? It surely would have hurt himRight and as a result Pete was demoted and there was an investigation to see if actions were taken to try and stop trump from being elected.... NOTHING WAS FOUND. In fact many details that could have hurt trump during the election were kept secret and not exposed. How does that work with your narrative?Their messages conveyed that they would do anything to stop Trump from being elected, and if they failed at that, do whatever they can (insurance policy) to get him thrown out of office. It doesn't have to be illegal to be inappropriate. You don't let investigators who hate a subject to investigate them.
This jerk off was in charge of the investigation. His favorite was Hillary who he interviewed. HTF do you prove he was not aggressive enough during the investigation as he otherwise would have been for anybody else?
If he and his whore had any ability to change the election or circumstances afterwards, they would have done it.
There was nothing to leak. I have no idea what you're talking about.
Timeline of Russia Investigation - FactCheck.org
Then why are you bitching about the “insurance policy” and such?There was an FBI investigation into Russia election meddling and collusion with the Trump campaign since July of 2016. That’s before the election and if these agents really wanted to impact the election and hurt Trump they could have simply leaked details. Instead the national media was obsessed with locking hillary up and email servers, and Comey announcing all kinds of details about that investigation that her opponents pounced on.Then why didn’t they leak about the Trump investigation? It surely would have hurt himRight and as a result Pete was demoted and there was an investigation to see if actions were taken to try and stop trump from being elected.... NOTHING WAS FOUND. In fact many details that could have hurt trump during the election were kept secret and not exposed. How does that work with your narrative?
This jerk off was in charge of the investigation. His favorite was Hillary who he interviewed. HTF do you prove he was not aggressive enough during the investigation as he otherwise would have been for anybody else?
If he and his whore had any ability to change the election or circumstances afterwards, they would have done it.
There was nothing to leak. I have no idea what you're talking about.
Timeline of Russia Investigation - FactCheck.org
Why would they?
They thought hillary was a shoe in.
If they consensus was to not recommend indicting Clinton then why would they use criminal language? It should be a mystery why the wording was changed.How are you not getting this Ray? Yes there was bias in the sense that they didn’t like Trump... so what?! Their work was reviewed and nothing improper was found more than “bad perception” which is why mueller took him off the case.No, I think people do their jobs and also have political opinions. It was investigated by the IG and no bias was seen in the work product.The big deal is Strokeoff was the one who interviewed Hillary in the email scandal. If he has a bias for her, don't you think that would have altered his questioning and reporting of answers?
There was definitely bias, and the IG is just as corrupt as the FBI. HTF can anybody read those texts and say there was no bias? Ray Charles could see the blatant bias.
I hate to break it to you but pretty much everybody in the world is bias, that doesn’t mean they are corrupt, liars or unable to execute their jobs
Than why did Stroke change the wording in the report from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless"?
That along with his texts got him shit canned from the Mewler investigation and demoted to human resources.
Even CNN admits it.
FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey description of Clinton - CNNPolitics
He was demoted because his text messages went public and there was a perception of bias. It was then investigated by the IG and determined that there was no bias in his work product. Those are the facts
That’s such a dumb statement . You mean the wording that they drafted for the statement that they were making to explain the conclusions of their investigation? The same investigation that the IG found no work product bias in?If they consensus was to not recommend indicting Clinton then why would they use criminal language? It should be a mystery why the wording was changed.How are you not getting this Ray? Yes there was bias in the sense that they didn’t like Trump... so what?! Their work was reviewed and nothing improper was found more than “bad perception” which is why mueller took him off the case.No, I think people do their jobs and also have political opinions. It was investigated by the IG and no bias was seen in the work product.
There was definitely bias, and the IG is just as corrupt as the FBI. HTF can anybody read those texts and say there was no bias? Ray Charles could see the blatant bias.
I hate to break it to you but pretty much everybody in the world is bias, that doesn’t mean they are corrupt, liars or unable to execute their jobs
Than why did Stroke change the wording in the report from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless"?
That along with his texts got him shit canned from the Mewler investigation and demoted to human resources.
Even CNN admits it.
FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey description of Clinton - CNNPolitics
He was demoted because his text messages went public and there was a perception of bias. It was then investigated by the IG and determined that there was no bias in his work product. Those are the facts
They changed the wording to avoid having to charge hillary.
Then why are you bitching about the “insurance policy” and such?There was an FBI investigation into Russia election meddling and collusion with the Trump campaign since July of 2016. That’s before the election and if these agents really wanted to impact the election and hurt Trump they could have simply leaked details. Instead the national media was obsessed with locking hillary up and email servers, and Comey announcing all kinds of details about that investigation that her opponents pounced on.Then why didn’t they leak about the Trump investigation? It surely would have hurt himThis jerk off was in charge of the investigation. His favorite was Hillary who he interviewed. HTF do you prove he was not aggressive enough during the investigation as he otherwise would have been for anybody else?
If he and his whore had any ability to change the election or circumstances afterwards, they would have done it.
There was nothing to leak. I have no idea what you're talking about.
Timeline of Russia Investigation - FactCheck.org
Why would they?
They thought hillary was a shoe in.
That’s such a dumb statement . You mean the wording that they drafted for the statement that they were making to explain the conclusions of their investigation? The same investigation that the IG found no work product bias in?If they consensus was to not recommend indicting Clinton then why would they use criminal language? It should be a mystery why the wording was changed.How are you not getting this Ray? Yes there was bias in the sense that they didn’t like Trump... so what?! Their work was reviewed and nothing improper was found more than “bad perception” which is why mueller took him off the case.There was definitely bias, and the IG is just as corrupt as the FBI. HTF can anybody read those texts and say there was no bias? Ray Charles could see the blatant bias.
I hate to break it to you but pretty much everybody in the world is bias, that doesn’t mean they are corrupt, liars or unable to execute their jobs
Than why did Stroke change the wording in the report from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless"?
That along with his texts got him shit canned from the Mewler investigation and demoted to human resources.
Even CNN admits it.
FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey description of Clinton - CNNPolitics
He was demoted because his text messages went public and there was a perception of bias. It was then investigated by the IG and determined that there was no bias in his work product. Those are the facts
They changed the wording to avoid having to charge hillary.
Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page was “cooperative” and "credible" in a closed-door session Friday with select House committee members that lasted nearly five hours.
U.S. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., had been among Page’s harshest critics heading into the session, but he said her cooperation “speaks well of her,” according to the Hill. Lisa Page 'cooperative,' 'credible,' lawmakers say after 5-hour closed-door session
Did loverboys terrible performance testifying spark this? Desire to try to salvage career? IS this the first crack in conspirators silence?
So in your mind, they had an insurance policy but didn’t use it because they thought Hillary was a shoe in? Did I get that right?Then why are you bitching about the “insurance policy” and such?There was an FBI investigation into Russia election meddling and collusion with the Trump campaign since July of 2016. That’s before the election and if these agents really wanted to impact the election and hurt Trump they could have simply leaked details. Instead the national media was obsessed with locking hillary up and email servers, and Comey announcing all kinds of details about that investigation that her opponents pounced on.Then why didn’t they leak about the Trump investigation? It surely would have hurt him
There was nothing to leak. I have no idea what you're talking about.
Timeline of Russia Investigation - FactCheck.org
Why would they?
They thought hillary was a shoe in.
Because LilStroke boy and Lisa said they had one dumbass.
Because the conclusion of their investigation was to not indict. It’s not hard to understandThat’s such a dumb statement . You mean the wording that they drafted for the statement that they were making to explain the conclusions of their investigation? The same investigation that the IG found no work product bias in?If they consensus was to not recommend indicting Clinton then why would they use criminal language? It should be a mystery why the wording was changed.How are you not getting this Ray? Yes there was bias in the sense that they didn’t like Trump... so what?! Their work was reviewed and nothing improper was found more than “bad perception” which is why mueller took him off the case.
I hate to break it to you but pretty much everybody in the world is bias, that doesn’t mean they are corrupt, liars or unable to execute their jobs
Than why did Stroke change the wording in the report from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless"?
That along with his texts got him shit canned from the Mewler investigation and demoted to human resources.
Even CNN admits it.
FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey description of Clinton - CNNPolitics
He was demoted because his text messages went public and there was a perception of bias. It was then investigated by the IG and determined that there was no bias in his work product. Those are the facts
They changed the wording to avoid having to charge hillary.
Why did Stroke change it?
So in your mind, they had an insurance policy but didn’t use it because they thought Hillary was a shoe in? Did I get that right?Then why are you bitching about the “insurance policy” and such?There was an FBI investigation into Russia election meddling and collusion with the Trump campaign since July of 2016. That’s before the election and if these agents really wanted to impact the election and hurt Trump they could have simply leaked details. Instead the national media was obsessed with locking hillary up and email servers, and Comey announcing all kinds of details about that investigation that her opponents pounced on.There was nothing to leak. I have no idea what you're talking about.
Timeline of Russia Investigation - FactCheck.org
Why would they?
They thought hillary was a shoe in.
Because LilStroke boy and Lisa said they had one dumbass.
They are using their insurance policy right now to prevent Trump from winning the election? Nice logicSo in your mind, they had an insurance policy but didn’t use it because they thought Hillary was a shoe in? Did I get that right?Then why are you bitching about the “insurance policy” and such?There was an FBI investigation into Russia election meddling and collusion with the Trump campaign since July of 2016. That’s before the election and if these agents really wanted to impact the election and hurt Trump they could have simply leaked details. Instead the national media was obsessed with locking hillary up and email servers, and Comey announcing all kinds of details about that investigation that her opponents pounced on.
Timeline of Russia Investigation - FactCheck.org
Why would they?
They thought hillary was a shoe in.
Because LilStroke boy and Lisa said they had one dumbass.
They using it now you nitwit.
Because the conclusion of their investigation was to not indict. It’s not hard to understandThat’s such a dumb statement . You mean the wording that they drafted for the statement that they were making to explain the conclusions of their investigation? The same investigation that the IG found no work product bias in?If they consensus was to not recommend indicting Clinton then why would they use criminal language? It should be a mystery why the wording was changed.Than why did Stroke change the wording in the report from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless"?
That along with his texts got him shit canned from the Mewler investigation and demoted to human resources.
Even CNN admits it.
FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey description of Clinton - CNNPolitics
He was demoted because his text messages went public and there was a perception of bias. It was then investigated by the IG and determined that there was no bias in his work product. Those are the facts
They changed the wording to avoid having to charge hillary.
Why did Stroke change it?
I love how you think you know more than the people who actually spent months investigating actual evidence. Sounds like you have wishful thinking and not an educated opinionBecause the conclusion of their investigation was to not indict. It’s not hard to understandThat’s such a dumb statement . You mean the wording that they drafted for the statement that they were making to explain the conclusions of their investigation? The same investigation that the IG found no work product bias in?If they consensus was to not recommend indicting Clinton then why would they use criminal language? It should be a mystery why the wording was changed.
He was demoted because his text messages went public and there was a perception of bias. It was then investigated by the IG and determined that there was no bias in his work product. Those are the facts
They changed the wording to avoid having to charge hillary.
Why did Stroke change it?
They changed the wording because they had no intention of prosecuting.
Just like they declared her innocent before they even finished the investigation.
I love how you think you know more than the people who actually spent months investigating actual evidence. Sounds like you have wishful thinking and not an educated opinionBecause the conclusion of their investigation was to not indict. It’s not hard to understandThat’s such a dumb statement . You mean the wording that they drafted for the statement that they were making to explain the conclusions of their investigation? The same investigation that the IG found no work product bias in?They changed the wording to avoid having to charge hillary.
Why did Stroke change it?
They changed the wording because they had no intention of prosecuting.
Just like they declared her innocent before they even finished the investigation.
