Austerity and tax cuts create jobs????

We are currently in a period of lower taxes and austerity. We are currently living the Conservative grand scheme.

I wish. What the heck are you smoking? And is it legal?

The consequences are vivid. We are seeing a full-on acting out of the modern day establishment Conservative dream of a country with very low taxes, a massive globalist interventionist military, and, if conservatives get their way,

But I thought you just said we were getting our way and living in a period of low taxes and living within our means. You really need to make up your mind.

a virtual disappearance of domestic spending to pay for the aforementioned.

We have no need to intervene in the world if we produce our own energy. Support drilling, mining, nuclear and every other kind of energy possible and produce it domestically and we can let the world do whatever they want.
 
Please go get your example in history where this has born out as true?


Use your common sense lefties. The government does not generate wealth. It confiscates it from the private sector. Didn't the collapse of communism teach you anything? American corporations pay the highest corporate tax rate in the world. That's why they move to foreign countries. Obama doesn't seem to understand that taxing corporations dry and placing unrealistic regulations does not enhance economic development. You can't force corporations to hire if they can't afford it and for that matter you can't force industry to invent a product that would replace petroleum. If the radical left was honest and admit that Obama is their big chance to win the socialist revolution it would be refreshing but they can't afford to tip their hand yet.
 
Show me these tax cuts. I don't see a soul advocating a reduction. Your theory has a flaw.

I am advocating tax cuts. I'm also advocating massive spending cuts.

We need to stop burdening the American people and more importantly stop burdening our children and grandchildren for our needs.
 
Please go get your example in history where this has born out as true?


Use your common sense lefties. The government does not generate wealth. It confiscates it from the private sector. Didn't the collapse of communism teach you anything? American corporations pay the highest corporate tax rate in the world(Japan is higher). That's why they move to foreign countries.(Give us some names) Obama doesn't seem to understand that taxing corporations dry and placing unrealistic regulations does not enhance economic development. You can't force corporations to hire if they can't afford it and for that matter you can't force industry to invent a product that would replace petroleum. (They have record profits and huge piles of cash right now and still have not hired)If the radical left was honest and admit that Obama is their big chance to win the socialist revolution it would be refreshing but they can't afford to tip their hand yet.



Why do you constantly lie about what the left is trying to do?

Your lies do not make it true and just distroy any unity the people of this country neesd so badly
 
Last edited:
Please go get your example in history where this has born out as true?
Depression of 1920

Then found here

Income tax in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is a list of the income tax throughout it's history since 1913. The relevant portion is here:

Applicable
Year Income
brackets First
bracket Top
bracket Source 1913-1915 - 1% 7% IRS 1916 - 2% 15% IRS 1917 - 2% 67% IRS 1918 - 6% 77% IRS 1919-1920 - 4% 73% IRS 1921 - 4% 73% IRS 1922 - 4% 56% IRS

As for Austerity? A reduction in around 50% of all government spending.

Of course... it was ONLY the roaring 20's. The biggest period of economic growth since the booms started under Reagan and concluded under Clinton (with a minor hiccup under HW Bush)
 
Depression of 1920



Conference on unemployment





Representatives attending the 1921 Conference on Unemployment held in Washington, D.C.
President Warren Harding convened a President's Conference on Unemployment at the instigation of then Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover as a result of rising unemployment during the recession. About 300 eminent members of industry, banking and labor were called together in September 1921 to discuss the problem of unemployment. Hoover organized the economic conference and a committee on unemployment. The committee established a branch in every state having substantial unemployment, along with sub-branches in local communities and mayors' emergency committees in 31 cities. The committee contributed relief to the unemployed, and also organized collaboration between the local and federal governments.

The Unemployment Conference stands as a watershed in federal policy with respect to depressions and unemployment relief. In sharp contrast to the total inaction and benign neglect that had characterized the response of previous administrations, the Conference not only conducted studies aimed at preventing future depressions through better management of the business cycle, but also provided practical assistance to local committees and encouraged a variety of local actions. These included the stimulation of public works and clean-up projects, advice on the organization and techniques of fund raising, and exhorting employers to adopt "work-sharing" plans. The Conference soon became an effective clearinghouse, disseminating ideas that local committees had found effective in providing jobs and temporary relief.

Field representatives were dispatched to assist local committees and to monitor their progress. Thus they not only facilitated the sharing of ideas, but provided vital situation reports by which overall progress could be measured. Reports from hundreds of cities provide interesting insights into conditions, responses and attitudes toward relief. In a few instances, field representatives discovered that very little was being done and that city fathers were not interested in cooperation. In such instances, the realization that their inactivity was being reported usually had the effect of prodding them into action.
 
Depression of 1920



Conference on unemployment





Representatives attending the 1921 Conference on Unemployment held in Washington, D.C.
President Warren Harding convened a President's Conference on Unemployment at the instigation of then Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover as a result of rising unemployment during the recession. About 300 eminent members of industry, banking and labor were called together in September 1921 to discuss the problem of unemployment. Hoover organized the economic conference and a committee on unemployment. The committee established a branch in every state having substantial unemployment, along with sub-branches in local communities and mayors' emergency committees in 31 cities. The committee contributed relief to the unemployed, and also organized collaboration between the local and federal governments.

The Unemployment Conference stands as a watershed in federal policy with respect to depressions and unemployment relief. In sharp contrast to the total inaction and benign neglect that had characterized the response of previous administrations, the Conference not only conducted studies aimed at preventing future depressions through better management of the business cycle, but also provided practical assistance to local committees and encouraged a variety of local actions. These included the stimulation of public works and clean-up projects, advice on the organization and techniques of fund raising, and exhorting employers to adopt "work-sharing" plans. The Conference soon became an effective clearinghouse, disseminating ideas that local committees had found effective in providing jobs and temporary relief.

Field representatives were dispatched to assist local committees and to monitor their progress. Thus they not only facilitated the sharing of ideas, but provided vital situation reports by which overall progress could be measured. Reports from hundreds of cities provide interesting insights into conditions, responses and attitudes toward relief. In a few instances, field representatives discovered that very little was being done and that city fathers were not interested in cooperation. In such instances, the realization that their inactivity was being reported usually had the effect of prodding them into action.
yes, and those 'solutions' were then implemented once Hoover got into power, and double/triple/quadrupled down on by FDR resulting in the Great Depression because the government was TOO involved, interfering with a natural cycle recovery which would have naturally come about by 1931-2 or so otherwise. BTW, by the time this conference occurred, the depression was over.

Once again, trusting in the ignorance of experts.
 
Conference on unemployment





Representatives attending the 1921 Conference on Unemployment held in Washington, D.C.
President Warren Harding convened a President's Conference on Unemployment at the instigation of then Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover as a result of rising unemployment during the recession. About 300 eminent members of industry, banking and labor were called together in September 1921 to discuss the problem of unemployment. Hoover organized the economic conference and a committee on unemployment. The committee established a branch in every state having substantial unemployment, along with sub-branches in local communities and mayors' emergency committees in 31 cities. The committee contributed relief to the unemployed, and also organized collaboration between the local and federal governments.

The Unemployment Conference stands as a watershed in federal policy with respect to depressions and unemployment relief. In sharp contrast to the total inaction and benign neglect that had characterized the response of previous administrations, the Conference not only conducted studies aimed at preventing future depressions through better management of the business cycle, but also provided practical assistance to local committees and encouraged a variety of local actions. These included the stimulation of public works and clean-up projects, advice on the organization and techniques of fund raising, and exhorting employers to adopt "work-sharing" plans. The Conference soon became an effective clearinghouse, disseminating ideas that local committees had found effective in providing jobs and temporary relief.

Field representatives were dispatched to assist local committees and to monitor their progress. Thus they not only facilitated the sharing of ideas, but provided vital situation reports by which overall progress could be measured. Reports from hundreds of cities provide interesting insights into conditions, responses and attitudes toward relief. In a few instances, field representatives discovered that very little was being done and that city fathers were not interested in cooperation. In such instances, the realization that their inactivity was being reported usually had the effect of prodding them into action.
 
Conference on unemployment





Representatives attending the 1921 Conference on Unemployment held in Washington, D.C.
President Warren Harding convened a President's Conference on Unemployment at the instigation of then Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover as a result of rising unemployment during the recession. About 300 eminent members of industry, banking and labor were called together in September 1921 to discuss the problem of unemployment. Hoover organized the economic conference and a committee on unemployment. The committee established a branch in every state having substantial unemployment, along with sub-branches in local communities and mayors' emergency committees in 31 cities. The committee contributed relief to the unemployed, and also organized collaboration between the local and federal governments.

The Unemployment Conference stands as a watershed in federal policy with respect to depressions and unemployment relief. In sharp contrast to the total inaction and benign neglect that had characterized the response of previous administrations, the Conference not only conducted studies aimed at preventing future depressions through better management of the business cycle, but also provided practical assistance to local committees and encouraged a variety of local actions. These included the stimulation of public works and clean-up projects, advice on the organization and techniques of fund raising, and exhorting employers to adopt "work-sharing" plans. The Conference soon became an effective clearinghouse, disseminating ideas that local committees had found effective in providing jobs and temporary relief.

Field representatives were dispatched to assist local committees and to monitor their progress. Thus they not only facilitated the sharing of ideas, but provided vital situation reports by which overall progress could be measured. Reports from hundreds of cities provide interesting insights into conditions, responses and attitudes toward relief. In a few instances, field representatives discovered that very little was being done and that city fathers were not interested in cooperation. In such instances, the realization that their inactivity was being reported usually had the effect of prodding them into action.
Repeating it doesn't change my response.
 
We went from a startup country in 1776 to the most prosperous nation without an income tax. Thanks to the creation of the fed and taxes, we have class warfare, debt, govt created bubbles to offset the previous bubble and so on....

The USA also supported (with taxes) our government in two ways:

1. by imposing highly PROTECTIVE TARRIFS on incoming manufactured goods; and

2. TAxing alcohol while making it impossible for small farmer distillers to stay in business. (they were supporting the slave, molasses RUM troika instead)

As to class warfare? THAT has always been a part of our (and every other modern) society.

See Shay's WHISKEY rebellion for further details of why I call that an excellent example of this nation's CLASS warfare.

fyi, i I could distill at last a couple hundred gallons of fine WHISKEY or JACK with my harvest this year.

EXCEPT that the way the taxes on distilling are structured (read by DESIGN) it does NOT make economic sense for me to do so.



How much does that personally cost me?

Well, what is the lost opportunity cost on a couple hundred gallons of very fine booze?

True, however the income tax is archaic and there are several ways that we could achieve maximum efficiency in funding the govt without using an income tax.
 
Such as when?

Yes when.

You guys are the ones claiming it will work.

Show us the time in history when it worked?


Calvin Coolidge
He kept spending well below the government revenues.
He reduced taxes (except for the tariff).
Surtax on personal income was reduced and estate taxes ,gift taxes were abolished.
He kept reducing taxes,and the more that taxes were lowered, it provided more surplus.
These are his words;
"Four times we have made a drastic revisions of our internal revenue system, abolishing many taxes and substantially reducing almost all other. Each time the resulting stimulation to business has so increased taxable incomes and profits that a surplus has been produced".
He worked to reduce the role of government in the economy.
And he vetoed all of the subsidies bills.
We grew and thrived as a nation by those policies. A large portion of the poor rose to middle class and some of the middle class rose to the rich.


This is exactly what we should be doing right now.
 
Conference on unemployment





Representatives attending the 1921 Conference on Unemployment held in Washington, D.C.
President Warren Harding convened a President's Conference on Unemployment at the instigation of then Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover as a result of rising unemployment during the recession. About 300 eminent members of industry, banking and labor were called together in September 1921 to discuss the problem of unemployment. Hoover organized the economic conference and a committee on unemployment. The committee established a branch in every state having substantial unemployment, along with sub-branches in local communities and mayors' emergency committees in 31 cities. The committee contributed relief to the unemployed, and also organized collaboration between the local and federal governments.

The Unemployment Conference stands as a watershed in federal policy with respect to depressions and unemployment relief. In sharp contrast to the total inaction and benign neglect that had characterized the response of previous administrations, the Conference not only conducted studies aimed at preventing future depressions through better management of the business cycle, but also provided practical assistance to local committees and encouraged a variety of local actions. These included the stimulation of public works and clean-up projects, advice on the organization and techniques of fund raising, and exhorting employers to adopt "work-sharing" plans. The Conference soon became an effective clearinghouse, disseminating ideas that local committees had found effective in providing jobs and temporary relief.

Field representatives were dispatched to assist local committees and to monitor their progress. Thus they not only facilitated the sharing of ideas, but provided vital situation reports by which overall progress could be measured. Reports from hundreds of cities provide interesting insights into conditions, responses and attitudes toward relief. In a few instances, field representatives discovered that very little was being done and that city fathers were not interested in cooperation. In such instances, the realization that their inactivity was being reported usually had the effect of prodding them into action.


How about this time?

:lol:
 
Calvin Coolidge
He kept spending well below the government revenues.
He reduced taxes (except for the tariff).
Surtax on personal income was reduced and estate taxes ,gift taxes were abolished.
He kept reducing taxes,and the more that taxes were lowered, it provided more surplus.
These are his words;
"Four times we have made a drastic revisions of our internal revenue system, abolishing many taxes and substantially reducing almost all other. Each time the resulting stimulation to business has so increased taxable incomes and profits that a surplus has been produced".
He worked to reduce the role of government in the economy.
And he vetoed all of the subsidies bills.
We grew and thrived as a nation by those policies. A large portion of the poor rose to middle class and some of the middle class rose to the rich.

This is exactly what we should be doing right now.

Coolidge didn't have Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid to contend with.
 
We went from a startup country in 1776 to the most prosperous nation without an income tax. Thanks to the creation of the fed and taxes, we have class warfare, debt, govt created bubbles to offset the previous bubble and so on....

We were also isolationist over roughly that same time period.

If we practiced the same principles that the founders did, we wouldn't be in this situation and that includes endless wars.

Sorry but this couldn't be further from the truth. The Monroe Doctrine was the genesis of our country's perpective on war.

SINCE COLONIAL TIMES we have continued to insert ourselves in conflicts and countries "in the defense of democracy." Since colonial times.

Check it:
Monroe Doctrine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sorry to burst your bubble...but there are no "good old days" to get back to. Each age has had myriad problems. This is what kills me about people's simplistic revisionism.
 
Conference on unemployment





Representatives attending the 1921 Conference on Unemployment held in Washington, D.C.
President Warren Harding convened a President's Conference on Unemployment at the instigation of then Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover as a result of rising unemployment during the recession. About 300 eminent members of industry, banking and labor were called together in September 1921 to discuss the problem of unemployment. Hoover organized the economic conference and a committee on unemployment. The committee established a branch in every state having substantial unemployment, along with sub-branches in local communities and mayors' emergency committees in 31 cities. The committee contributed relief to the unemployed, and also organized collaboration between the local and federal governments.

The Unemployment Conference stands as a watershed in federal policy with respect to depressions and unemployment relief. In sharp contrast to the total inaction and benign neglect that had characterized the response of previous administrations, the Conference not only conducted studies aimed at preventing future depressions through better management of the business cycle, but also provided practical assistance to local committees and encouraged a variety of local actions. These included the stimulation of public works and clean-up projects, advice on the organization and techniques of fund raising, and exhorting employers to adopt "work-sharing" plans. The Conference soon became an effective clearinghouse, disseminating ideas that local committees had found effective in providing jobs and temporary relief.

Field representatives were dispatched to assist local committees and to monitor their progress. Thus they not only facilitated the sharing of ideas, but provided vital situation reports by which overall progress could be measured. Reports from hundreds of cities provide interesting insights into conditions, responses and attitudes toward relief. In a few instances, field representatives discovered that very little was being done and that city fathers were not interested in cooperation. In such instances, the realization that their inactivity was being reported usually had the effect of prodding them into action.


How about this time?

:lol:
funny-pictures-cuteness-scale-to-i-iz-an-elebenty.jpg


Cute. VERY cute.

:rofl:
 
If we lower taxes, get rid of subsidies and over regulation, and passed a balanced budget amendment (of which 74% of this country wants) we would have many more businesses starting to hire employees and also it would start new small businesses.
And also would bring back some companies from overseas.
But we do need to reform SSI,Medicare and Medicaid for the future generations.
We need to repeal The new Health Care bill because it costs to much now. What will it be like in the future?
Whenever we have put the emphasis on the private sector, rather than the government we have always prospered.
 

Forum List

Back
Top