The T
George S. Patton Party
Sans Teleprompter.By his own admission Obama's a failed leader.
Well, he is when he puts pen to paper.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sans Teleprompter.By his own admission Obama's a failed leader.
Well, he is when he puts pen to paper.
Think again...As to going after our enemies? I did. Everything else domestically he was wrong about, and I have stated such. Interesting YOU applaud Obama for doing the very same thing.What irony is that? That you are one of the moochers that want larger government? If that be the case? You are correct. You have my permission to laugh at yourself.
Oh the irony.
You cheered Bush for 8 long years while he set up the Department of Homeland defense, started 2 real live wars in which countries were conquered and nation building took place, signed into law medicare part d and are now rambling on about "big government".
That's irony gold..pal.
If you want to acknowledge that Bush was in fact responsible for everything that happened on his watch,
then yes, you earn the right to proclaim Obama responsible for everything that has happened on his watch.
Does this mean that you proclaim Obama responsible for everything that has happened on his watch?
I never held Bush responsible for everything that happened on his watch, so fuck off.
It does make you wonder doesn't it? I remember when the crisis was happening and McCain stopped his campaign. I wonder what he would have done? And think about this one. What if he were elected and then died and Palin took over the seat. That is the stuff of nightmares.
And now the right wants us to have another nightmare as they play politics with the debt ceiling to protect their corporate masters.
The debt is increasing at the rate of about a Trhillion dollars every 9 months.
Are you suggesting that the debt limit be increased with no plan whatsoever to slow the growth of the debt?
Republicans voted 19 times to increase the debt limit under Bush with "no plan". What's changed, exactly?
Oh yeah..there's a Democrat in the White House..so now deficits "matter".
What irony is that? That you are one of the moochers that want larger government? If that be the case? You are correct. You have my permission to laugh at yourself.
Oh the irony.
You cheered Bush for 8 long years while he set up the Department of Homeland defense, started 2 real live wars in which countries were conquered and nation building took place, signed into law medicare part d and are now rambling on about "big government".
That's irony gold..pal.
By his own admission Obama's a failed leader.
"Born at the earliest fringe of the baby boom, Mr. Bush was pressed during his years at Yale, 1964 to 1968, to take sides in the great battles then unfolding over politics, civil rights, drugs and music. Mostly he was a noncombatant in those upheavals, but when forced to choose, he ultimately retreated to the values and ideals established by his parents' generation, and to their accepted methods of rebelling.
In short, while some students took to the barricades....
.....Mr. Bush took to the bar.
The debt is increasing at the rate of about a Trhillion dollars every 9 months.
Are you suggesting that the debt limit be increased with no plan whatsoever to slow the growth of the debt?
Republicans voted 19 times to increase the debt limit under Bush with "no plan". What's changed, exactly?
Oh yeah..there's a Democrat in the White House..so now deficits "matter".
The rate of increase in the debt has risen by about 8 fold. At this rate, the debt will have almost doubled during the Big 0's term.
God forbid what it might do if he's re-elected.
What irony is that? That you are one of the moochers that want larger government? If that be the case? You are correct. You have my permission to laugh at yourself.
You cheered Bush for 8 long years while he set up the Department of Homeland defense, started 2 real live wars in which countries were conquered and nation building took place, signed into law medicare part d and are now rambling on about "big government".
That's irony gold..pal.
So we agree that W was a Big Government Liberal who spent public money that was not available and should have showed more fiscal responsibility and restraint.
The hyper space pace of spending established by the Big 0 makes the free spending W appear to be miserly and conservative.
How can you oppose the policies of W as being unwise when the policies of the Big 0 are just the same thing but amplified?
This seems like a departure from logic.