Assault weapons ban

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by blackhawk, Jan 25, 2013.

  1. beagle9
    Offline

    beagle9 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    13,536
    Thanks Received:
    1,258
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +5,664
    Very dumb response to such a well written post..... This is the lib mindset though, where as it's like you people have been sheltered all your life, and then if by some chance you get into a leadership position due to having possibly more book sense then you have common sense as to be coupled with it, then you easily make fools of yourself as to what most in the country who are Americans think about you sadly enough. Especially when you open your mouths in this way, but it's ok though, because it is all due to your upbringing I guess.....I mean is there any other explanation out there really to explain it ? (smile)
     
  2. Snookie
    Offline

    Snookie Groovy Dude

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    4,538
    Thanks Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    virginia
    Ratings:
    +409
    Every red blooded american should have the right to have a nuclear bomb.
     
  3. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,218
    Thanks Received:
    1,766
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,572
    Nothing you say he negates the soundness of my response - you're arguing apples and potatoes.
     
  4. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,218
    Thanks Received:
    1,766
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,572
    Give him a break - he's doing the best he can with what he has to work with.
     
  5. M14 Shooter
    Offline

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    20,218
    Thanks Received:
    1,766
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Ratings:
    +4,572
    The jurisprudence on this issue is very clear.
    That the 2nd does not protect every weapon imaginable does not in any way support an argument that certain firearms are not protected.
     
  6. beagle9
    Offline

    beagle9 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    13,536
    Thanks Received:
    1,258
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +5,664
    The regulations that have been placed on them in the past, has shown not to work, because as it is being attempted once again we are trying to regulate without identifying the real culprits in the situation, so going after an object is safer when it comes to idiotic politicians, because they don't want to make any voter base they think they have in their tool box mad now do they? Problem with this way of thinking, is that all voters are not necessarily good people, but if they can lift that hand and vote, then they are all the best of people in a politicians view, so the beat goes on as our freedoms parish under this way of doing business in America these days, especially on the issues that are being dealt with now in these ways.
     
  7. Snookie
    Offline

    Snookie Groovy Dude

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    4,538
    Thanks Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    virginia
    Ratings:
    +409
    Your opinion is not valid IMHO.
     
  8. beagle9
    Offline

    beagle9 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    13,536
    Thanks Received:
    1,258
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +5,664


    Is this his brain trying to think about this just a tad bit better maybe....lol

    Now this is nuclear..

    :blowup:
     
  9. beagle9
    Offline

    beagle9 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    13,536
    Thanks Received:
    1,258
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +5,664
    A lot of thought went into that one didn't it ?
     
  10. Sactowndog
    Offline

    Sactowndog Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Messages:
    723
    Thanks Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +60
    Actually it's not. As pointed out the 2nd Amendment was intended to insure the people weren't out gunned by the Federal government. The best argument you have is the people are currently so outgunned that banning assault weapons won't amount to a hill of beans.

    The current concentration of power and technology in our federal government is enourmous. The ability of the President to do damn well anything he pleases has been unchallenged by the ends justifies the means left and the in the all mighty America crowd on the Right. Ron Paul was a lone voice in the wilderness on this topic and if the republicans had nominated him I would have voted for him.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2013

Share This Page