As President Trump is indicted for January 6, more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.

[NotfooledbyW]

reasonable belief

Orange Evangelicals and Orange Man Disciples must never join “reasonable” to define their beliefs.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

As usual, you are confused.

NO ONE has argued that Trump ordered NG. He did, as multiple sources state, offer the NG. And Pelosi and the idiot mayor of DC refused.

NG must be requested. Trump offered NG, they refused to request them.

And it has been proven by his own people he didn't even offer them.
Why do constantly run back to things that have already been debunked?

 

[excalibur]

And it has been proven by his own people he didn't even offer them.
Why do constantly run back to things that have already been debunked?

LOL

They were offered. Period.

Capitol Police rejected offers of federal help to quell mob

WASHINGTON (AP) — Three days before supporters of President Donald Trump rioted at the Capitol, the Pentagon asked the U.S Capitol Police if it needed National Guard manpower.

apnews.com

 

[Doc7505]

Nah, Trump is weaponizing his silly theme of persecution.

He has earned two impeachments, three indictments, and all the rest coming to him.

~~~~~~
Just how many times are you willing to indict #45 for the same supposed crimes?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

LOL

They were offered. Period.

Capitol Police rejected offers of federal help to quell mob

WASHINGTON (AP) — Three days before supporters of President Donald Trump rioted at the Capitol, the Pentagon asked the U.S Capitol Police if it needed National Guard manpower.

apnews.com

I just KNEW you were gonna throw this article up. It's already been debunked....honestly, just deal with it and move on.

Again..he never offered them.

Fact Check: Did Pelosi Reject Trump’s Request for National Guard Troops on January 6?

A claim from Donald Trump Jr. is false.

thedispatch.com

 

[excalibur]

A Capitol Police timeline of the days and weeks surrounding Jan. 6 shows former President Donald Trump’s Department of Defense (DOD) offered the National Guard’s assistance in the days leading up to the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol, validating claims from Trump administration officials that were said to be false by liberal fact-checkers.

What we also know is that President Trump wanted to make sure that the people that came, that there was a safe environment for that kind of assembly,” former President Donald Trump’s Chief of Staff Mark Meadows told Fox News’s Sean Hannity.

And I’ve said that publicly before — the 10,000 National Guard troops that he wanted to make sure that everything was safe and secure," Meadows said.

"Obviously having those National Guards available, actually the reason they were able to respond when they did, was because President Trump had actually put them on alert.

Liberal “fact-checkers” like The Washington Post and PolitiFact argued the claim about National Guard assistance coming from Meadows and other top Trump administration officials was false, but an official timeline of the events leading up to Jan. 6 apparently shows differently.

According to the timeline, a DOD official reached out to Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher four days before the attack on the U.S. Capitol to inquire about whether Capitol Police anticipated they would request National Guard troops be deployed to prepare for Jan. 6.​

Trump admin was ready to deploy National Guard on Jan 6, Capitol Police timeline shows

A Capitol Police timeline of the days and weeks surrounding Jan. 6 shows former President Donald Trump’s Department of Defense (DOD) offered the National Guard’s assistance in the days leading up to the violent attack on the U. S. Capitol, validating claims from Trump administration officials...

mynbc15.com

 

[excalibur]

An official timeline of the Jan. 6 tragedy assembled by Capitol Police shows that a Defense Department official reached out to a Capitol Police deputy chief, Sean Gallagher, on Jan. 2, 2021 to see if a request for troops was forthcoming, but the offer was quickly rejected after a consultation with then-Chief Steve Sund.

"Carol Corbin (DOD) texts USCP Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher, Protective Service Bureau, to determine whether USCP is considering a request for National Guard soldiers for January 6, 2021 event," the timeline reads in the lone entry listed for Saturday, Jan. 2, 2021.

The following morning, the timeline states, "Gallagher replies to DOD via text that a request for National Guard support not forthcoming at this time after consultation with COP Sund."

You can read the full police timeline here:


File

USCPJan.6Timeline.pdf
​

Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before Jan. 6 riots, memo shows

Official Capitol Police timeline validates Trump administration's account, shows Democrats' fateful rejections of offers. "Seems absolutely illogical," one official wrote about security posture hours before riot began.

justthenews.com

 

[airplanemechanic]

That's a lie. Trump did not offer national guard.

Yes, he did. On Jan 2, and they were turned down. Not by Pissloser, though. It was turned down by Gallagher.

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2022-06/USCPJan.6Timeline.pdf?utm_source=117th+Members%2C+Chiefs%2C+And+Comms+Directors&utm_campaign=58cfd8acaa-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_02_04_09_01_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3985f74780-58cfd8acaa-147614274

 

[d0gbreath]

Of course it was a set-up, a rigged hoax of a witch trial.

 

[two_iron]

Trump ended up with an affirmative action, knuckledragging Waffle House waitress. Absolutely guarantee its IQ is sub 85... but its quite obedient.

We really..... REALLY need to divorce these filthy fucking parasites.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I just KNEW you were gonna throw this article up. It's already been debunked....honestly, just deal with it and move on.

Again..he never offered them.

Fact Check: Did Pelosi Reject Trump’s Request for National Guard Troops on January 6?

A claim from Donald Trump Jr. is false.

thedispatch.com

Pelosi didn't turn down the request, Gallagher did.

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2022-06/USCPJan.6Timeline.pdf?utm_source=117th+Members%2C+Chiefs%2C+And+Comms+Directors&utm_campaign=58cfd8acaa-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_02_04_09_01_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3985f74780-58cfd8acaa-147614274

 

[Manonthestreet]

https://www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2023/08/download-3.jpg

 

[MinTrut]

As President Trump is indicted for January 6, ​

more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.​

As President Trump is indicted for January 6, more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.

Coincidentally, I’m sure, in the lead-up to his being taken off the air at Fox News, Tucker Carlson and his team were investigating events on January 6—the same events that are serving as the basis for Jack Smith’s creative indictme...

www.americanthinker.com

5 Au 2023 ~~ By Andrea Widburg

Once Trump announced a rally in D.C., he and his supporters were doomed.
Coincidentally, I’m sure, in the lead-up to his being taken off the air at Fox News, Tucker Carlson and his team were investigating events on January 6—the same events that are serving as the basis for Jack Smith’s creative indictment against Donald Trump. One of the things that Fox News prevented from airing was an interview with former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund, during which he told Tucker that the FBI had “a lot of operatives” in the crowd. There was more, and it all feeds into the reasonable belief that January 6 was a set-up.

January 6 has been enormously useful to the Democrats:

• It allowed them to certify the electoral college votes without any objections. These objections (which Democrats have vigorously made over the years) are a prerequisite to challenging the count.
• It allowed them to round up almost 1,000 Trump supporters and destroy their lives, a useful lesson to anyone else who might think about opposing the Biden regime…er, administration.
• It allowed them to pretend that the lack of crowds in D.C. for Biden’s inauguration was due to security requirements rather than to the reality, which is that no one would have shown up anyway.
• And, of course, most usefully at all, it’s just allowed them to indict Biden’s chief rival, President Donald Trump, in the lead-up to the 2024 election. The charge, while failing to use the word “insurrection,” essentially alleges that Trump defrauded America by ignoring those of his advisors who believed in the 2024 election (many of whom have been outed as fervent Trump haters) and, instead, looking to evidence of election of fraud and believing that election.

Knowing how useful January 6 was for Democrats—and considering that the “insurrection” narrative kicked within fewer than 24 hours —it’s worth considering a very loose rundown of the timeline.

• Trump announced a rally in D.C. on the day that the Senate was set to certify the election.
• Trump asks for extra security in D.C. for that day, a request that is refused.
• Trump tells those at the rally who “will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voice heard.”
• The crowd at the Capitol did not become agitated until the police, without any warning to the crowd to disperse, suddenly fired flash bangs into the crowd.
• People in whom the FBI had no interest were filmed removing barriers and urging people into the Capitol. (See here and here.) Significantly, those who weren’t on the front lines would have had no idea that they weren’t being invited into the Capitol, especially because the Capitol police were welcoming them in (which should negate any charges that they were illegally trespassing).
• Trump immediately issued tweets telling the crowd to remain peaceful and disperse. (See here and here.) Soon after, Twitter shut down his account, making his tweet inaccessible for posterity to revisit.
• Trump tried to get to the Capitol to calm the crowd but was prevented from doing so.
• Capitol police apparently beat one Trump supporter to death and shot to death an unarmed woman. Otherwise, no one suffered any serious injuries at the hands of the crowd—although Democrats lied relentlessly about Officer Sicknick, who emerged unscathed on January 6, only to die later from a stroke.

In event after event, it’s the system, not Trump, that’s inexorably pulling the crowd into the Capitol. And in event after event, it was Trump who tried to put the brakes on things, only to be blocked.
The previously hidden revelations from former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund are entirely consistent with the above facts:

Former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund told Tucker Carlson “there was a fair amount of law enforcement” in the January 6th crowd, in footage exclusively obtained by The National Pulse. The bombshell news follows revelations that Sund had called the events surrounding the Capitol riot “a cover up,” adding his concerns over provocateurs like Ray Epps.​

Indeed, added Sund, in over 30 years of police work, he’d never seen so much law enforcement. In the same suppressed interview, Sund also revealed that the FBI had worked with him during the IMF protests and the Bush inauguration.
You can see the entire interview at The National Pulse.


Commentary:
Yes!, It was a setup. conservatives would be wise to watch for even more false flag operations heading into the 2024 elections. Not just the presidential race, but any conservative gathering. Expect more `Democrat` governor kidnapping plots, more Republican rallies infiltrated by ANTIFA and FBI/Stasi, more terrorist parents protecting their children and there are always those Catholic terrorists. Just watch how it unfolds. It has been so successful so why wouldn't the Maoist/DSA Democrat Commies just ramp it up?
Conservatives need to be very, very careful.
It is highly probable that there was indeed a conspiracy to obstruct government processes, but it was the opposite of what Smith alleges. It was a Democratic operation led by Nancy Pelosi and demonstrated by FBI/Stasi operatives. Among the many reasons for the Left to prevent Trump's re-election is the possibility that a real inquiry into Jan 6 would be conducted.

Some excellent points.

But keep in mind that the Democrats at this point not only appear to want World War 3, but may be actively pushing/wishing/hoping to radicalize Trump’s most avid supporters to an extent that the country could be plunged into civil war.

Modern Democrats are quite simply the greatest danger this country has ever faced.

Far worse than Nazis.

 

[Concerned American]

That's a lie. Trump did not offer national guard.

He damn sure did on Jan. 3, you lying moron. I'll be looking for your concession on this point, but I doubt it will be forthcoming. Liars are like that.

Retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg said last week that former President Donald Trump did in fact request National Guard troops be deployed in Washington D.C. before the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Kellogg said he was present at the time of Trump’s request, and Congress should release his testimony to the public.

Gen. Kellogg: Trump did request Nat'l Guard troops on Jan. 6th; asks Congress to release his testimony

Retired U.S. Army Gen. Keith Kellogg said President Donald Trump requested National Guard deployments in Washington D.C. before Jan. 6, 2021.

americanmilitarynews.com

 

[surada]

He damn sure did on Jan. 3, you lying moron. I'll be looking for your concession on this point, but I doubt it will be forthcoming. Liars are like that.

Retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg said last week that former President Donald Trump did in fact request National Guard troops be deployed in Washington D.C. before the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Kellogg said he was present at the time of Trump’s request, and Congress should release his testimony to the public.

Gen. Kellogg: Trump did request Nat'l Guard troops on Jan. 6th; asks Congress to release his testimony

Retired U.S. Army Gen. Keith Kellogg said President Donald Trump requested National Guard deployments in Washington D.C. before Jan. 6, 2021.

americanmilitarynews.com

On January 3? Did Trump know it would get bad?

 

[Concerned American]

On January 3? Did Trump know it would get bad?

He had enough foresight to anticipate it. Pelosi, by all accounts, didn't want the help and chose to pull a false flag. WTF, did you want him to wait until the seventh to call them. You're a moron. READ THE FUCKING LINK.

 

[surada]

He had enough foresight to anticipate it. Pelosi, by all accounts, didn't want the help and chose to pull a false flag. WTF, did you want him to wait until the seventh to call them. You're a moron. READ THE FUCKING LINK.

Then why didn't Trump call it off?

 

[Concerned American]

Then why didn't Trump call it off?

Bbbbbut, bbbbbut, STFU. Why didn't Hillary call off the pussy brigade? You made the statement that he didn't offer the Nat'l Guard--going as far as calling it a lie. Now you want to play a diversion game. Are you going to retract your previous statement as it has proven you to be a liar? AGAIN.

 

[surada]

Bbbbbut, bbbbbut, STFU. Why didn't Hillary call off the pussy brigade? You made the statement that he didn't offer the Nat'l Guard--going as far as calling it a lie. Now you want to play a diversion game. Are you going to retract your previous statement as it has proven you to be a liar? AGAIN.

What does Hillary have to do with January 6th?

 

[Concerned American]

What does Hillary have to do with January 6th?

Are you going to respond to the original post or are you going to totally abandon that prep school education that you are so proud of? BTW, did you ever discover the meaning of Sino---