A generation ago, there was honest philosophical debate between liberals and conservatives about the role of government and the overall well being of the American people. This generally continued through the Reagan years, but began to unravel shortly thereafter.
Bill Clinton was ( and still is) a master politician, but his personal history and actions became an anathema to roughly half of the population. After 12 years of Republican control of the White House, heretofore honest liberals were faced with a Hobson's Choice of defending a personally corrupt individual or surrendering the field back to their philosophical opponents. Unfortunately, most chose the former route (e.g., NOW) and thus forfeited the moral high ground they had previously claimed.
Since that time, the great philosophical debate has devolved into a raw quest for power, with electoral success by any means becoming the paramount objective. Richard Nixon would be proud of them.
Bill Clinton was ( and still is) a master politician, but his personal history and actions became an anathema to roughly half of the population. After 12 years of Republican control of the White House, heretofore honest liberals were faced with a Hobson's Choice of defending a personally corrupt individual or surrendering the field back to their philosophical opponents. Unfortunately, most chose the former route (e.g., NOW) and thus forfeited the moral high ground they had previously claimed.
Since that time, the great philosophical debate has devolved into a raw quest for power, with electoral success by any means becoming the paramount objective. Richard Nixon would be proud of them.
Last edited: